Effects of Closed Mouth vs. Exposed Teeth on Facial Expression Processing: An ERP Study.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.3390/bs15020163
Nicolas M Brunet, Alexandra R Ackerman
{"title":"Effects of Closed Mouth vs. Exposed Teeth on Facial Expression Processing: An ERP Study.","authors":"Nicolas M Brunet, Alexandra R Ackerman","doi":"10.3390/bs15020163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study examines the neural mechanisms underlying facial recognition, focusing on how emotional expression and mouth display modulate event-related potential (ERP) waveforms. 42 participants categorized faces by gender in one of two experimental setups: one featuring full-face images and another with cropped faces presented against neutral gray backgrounds. The stimuli included 288 images balanced across gender, race/ethnicity, emotional expression (\"Fearful\", \"Happy\", \"Neutral\"), and mouth display (\"closed mouth\" vs. \"open mouth with exposed teeth\"). Results revealed that N170 amplitude was significantly greater for open-mouth (exposed teeth) conditions (<i>p</i> < 0.01), independent of emotional expression, and no interaction between emotional expression and mouth display was found. However, the P100 amplitude exhibited a significant interaction between these variables (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Monte Carlo simulations analyzing N170 latency differences showed that fearful faces elicited a faster response than happy and neutral faces, with a 2 ms delay unlikely to occur by chance (<i>p</i> < 0.01). While these findings challenge prior research suggesting that N170 is directly influenced by emotional expression, they also highlight the potential role of emotional intensity as an alternative explanation. This underscores the importance of further studies to disentangle these effects. This study highlights the critical need to control for mouth display when investigating emotional face processing. The results not only refine our understanding of the neural dynamics of face perception but also confirm that the brain processes fearful expressions more rapidly than happy or neutral ones. These insights offer valuable methodological considerations for future neuroimaging research on emotion perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study examines the neural mechanisms underlying facial recognition, focusing on how emotional expression and mouth display modulate event-related potential (ERP) waveforms. 42 participants categorized faces by gender in one of two experimental setups: one featuring full-face images and another with cropped faces presented against neutral gray backgrounds. The stimuli included 288 images balanced across gender, race/ethnicity, emotional expression ("Fearful", "Happy", "Neutral"), and mouth display ("closed mouth" vs. "open mouth with exposed teeth"). Results revealed that N170 amplitude was significantly greater for open-mouth (exposed teeth) conditions (p < 0.01), independent of emotional expression, and no interaction between emotional expression and mouth display was found. However, the P100 amplitude exhibited a significant interaction between these variables (p < 0.05). Monte Carlo simulations analyzing N170 latency differences showed that fearful faces elicited a faster response than happy and neutral faces, with a 2 ms delay unlikely to occur by chance (p < 0.01). While these findings challenge prior research suggesting that N170 is directly influenced by emotional expression, they also highlight the potential role of emotional intensity as an alternative explanation. This underscores the importance of further studies to disentangle these effects. This study highlights the critical need to control for mouth display when investigating emotional face processing. The results not only refine our understanding of the neural dynamics of face perception but also confirm that the brain processes fearful expressions more rapidly than happy or neutral ones. These insights offer valuable methodological considerations for future neuroimaging research on emotion perception.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
闭口与露齿对面部表情处理的影响:ERP研究
目前的研究探讨了面部识别的神经机制,重点是情绪表达和嘴部显示如何调节事件相关电位(ERP)波形。42名参与者在两种实验设置中按性别对面部进行分类:一种是全脸照片,另一种是在中性灰色背景下呈现的裁剪过的脸。这些刺激包括288张不同性别、种族/民族、情绪表达(“恐惧”、“快乐”、“中性”)和嘴巴表现(“闭着嘴”和“沉默”)的图片。“张开嘴巴,露出牙齿”)。结果显示,开口(露牙)条件下N170振幅显著高于开口(p < 0.01),且与情绪表达无关,情绪表达与口腔表现无交互作用。然而,P100振幅在这些变量之间表现出显著的相互作用(p < 0.05)。蒙特卡洛模拟分析N170延迟差异表明,恐惧面孔比快乐和中性面孔引起的反应更快,2毫秒的延迟不太可能偶然发生(p < 0.01)。虽然这些发现挑战了先前的研究,即N170直接受到情绪表达的影响,但它们也强调了情绪强度作为另一种解释的潜在作用。这强调了进一步研究这些影响的重要性。本研究强调了在调查情绪面部处理时控制嘴部表情的重要性。研究结果不仅完善了我们对面部感知的神经动力学的理解,而且证实了大脑处理恐惧表情比处理快乐或中性表情要快。这些见解为未来情绪感知的神经影像学研究提供了有价值的方法学考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Baseline Mood and "Relational Triad" Predict Acute Qualities of Psychedelic Experience. Pandemic Babies: Developmental Outcomes in Preschool-Aged Children Born During the COVID-19 Era. Observational Comparison of Outcomes of Sandplay Therapy (SPT-SAFE) Versus Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT-BI) for Elementary School Students with NSSI and Suicidal Ideation: A Retrospective School-Based Study. Sex-Based Mechanisms of Stress-Induced Alcohol-Seeking. People Are Unwilling to Help Others Pursue a Luxury Life: Egocentric or Other-Centric Motivations?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1