{"title":"Prediction of In Vivo Knee Mechanics During Daily Activities Based on a Musculoskeletal Model Incorporated with a Subject-Specific Knee Joint.","authors":"Li Zhang, Hui Li, Xianjie Wan, Peng Xu, Aibin Zhu, Pingping Wei","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12020153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to develop a musculoskeletal model incorporated with a subject-specific knee joint to predict the tibiofemoral contact force (TFCF) during daily motions. For this purpose, 18 healthy participants were recruited to perform the motion data acquisition using synchronized motion capture and force platform systems, and motion simulation based on an improved musculoskeletal model for five daily activities, including normal walking, stair ascent, stair descent, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit. The proposed musculoskeletal model included subject-specific models of bones, cartilages, and meniscus, detailed knee ligaments and muscles, deformable elastic contacts, and multiple degrees of freedom (DOFs) of the knee joint. The prediction accuracy was demonstrated by the good agreements of TFCF curves between the model predictions and in vivo measurements for the five activities (RMSE: 0.216~0.311 BW, R<sup>2</sup>: 0.928~0.992, and C<sub>E</sub>: 0.048~0.141). Based on the validated model, the TFCF on total, medial, and lateral compartments (TFCF<sub>Total</sub>, TFCF<sub>Medial</sub>, and TFCF<sub>Lateral</sub>) during the five daily activities were predicted. For TFCF<sub>Total</sub>, the peak force for stair descent or sit-to-stand was the largest, followed by stair ascent or stand-to-sit, and finally normal walking. For TFCF<sub>Medial</sub>, stair descent had the largest peak, followed by stair ascent. There were no significant differences between the peak TFCF<sub>Medial</sub> values of normal walking, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit. For TFCF<sub>Lateral</sub>, the peak of sit-to-stand was the largest, followed by stand-to-sit or stair descent, and finally normal walking or stair ascent. This study is valuable for further understanding the biomechanics of a healthy knee joint and providing theoretical guidance for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12020153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop a musculoskeletal model incorporated with a subject-specific knee joint to predict the tibiofemoral contact force (TFCF) during daily motions. For this purpose, 18 healthy participants were recruited to perform the motion data acquisition using synchronized motion capture and force platform systems, and motion simulation based on an improved musculoskeletal model for five daily activities, including normal walking, stair ascent, stair descent, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit. The proposed musculoskeletal model included subject-specific models of bones, cartilages, and meniscus, detailed knee ligaments and muscles, deformable elastic contacts, and multiple degrees of freedom (DOFs) of the knee joint. The prediction accuracy was demonstrated by the good agreements of TFCF curves between the model predictions and in vivo measurements for the five activities (RMSE: 0.216~0.311 BW, R2: 0.928~0.992, and CE: 0.048~0.141). Based on the validated model, the TFCF on total, medial, and lateral compartments (TFCFTotal, TFCFMedial, and TFCFLateral) during the five daily activities were predicted. For TFCFTotal, the peak force for stair descent or sit-to-stand was the largest, followed by stair ascent or stand-to-sit, and finally normal walking. For TFCFMedial, stair descent had the largest peak, followed by stair ascent. There were no significant differences between the peak TFCFMedial values of normal walking, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit. For TFCFLateral, the peak of sit-to-stand was the largest, followed by stand-to-sit or stair descent, and finally normal walking or stair ascent. This study is valuable for further understanding the biomechanics of a healthy knee joint and providing theoretical guidance for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering