Determinants of Adherence to World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Recommendations in Women with Breast Cancer.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancers Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.3390/cancers17040708
Vanessa Pachón Olmos, Marina Pollán, Nerea Fernández de Larrea-Baz, Julia Fernández-Morata, Emma Ruiz-Moreno, Javier García-Pérez, Adela Castelló, María Ángeles Sierra, Pilar Lucas, Isabel Alonso-Ledesma, Agostina Stradella, Blanca Cantos, Teresa Ramón Y Cajal, Marta Santisteban, Miguel Ángel Seguí, Ana Santaballa Bertrán, Mónica Granja, Julia Camps-Herrero, Sabela Recalde, Miriam Mendez, Nuria Calvo Verges, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Roberto Pastor-Barriuso, Virginia Lope
{"title":"Determinants of Adherence to World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Recommendations in Women with Breast Cancer.","authors":"Vanessa Pachón Olmos, Marina Pollán, Nerea Fernández de Larrea-Baz, Julia Fernández-Morata, Emma Ruiz-Moreno, Javier García-Pérez, Adela Castelló, María Ángeles Sierra, Pilar Lucas, Isabel Alonso-Ledesma, Agostina Stradella, Blanca Cantos, Teresa Ramón Y Cajal, Marta Santisteban, Miguel Ángel Seguí, Ana Santaballa Bertrán, Mónica Granja, Julia Camps-Herrero, Sabela Recalde, Miriam Mendez, Nuria Calvo Verges, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Roberto Pastor-Barriuso, Virginia Lope","doi":"10.3390/cancers17040708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) cancer prevention recommendations benefit primary prevention and survivor outcomes. This study evaluated the adherence to these recommendations during the year prior to breast cancer diagnosis and identified related clinical and sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 915 patients with breast cancer were recruited from eight hospitals in four regions of Spain. The participants completed an epidemiologic questionnaire and a food frequency questionnaire. The compliance with the WCRF/AICR recommendations was assessed using a standardized score based on seven recommendations. Standardized prevalences and standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) for moderate and high adherence were calculated based on participant characteristics using binary and multinomial logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean adherence was 3.5 points out of 7. The recommendations with the best and worst adherence were avoiding sugar-sweetened drinks (54.4% adherence) and maintaining a fiber-rich diet (4.4% consumed ≥30 g/day). The overall adherence was better in women aged ≥60 years (SPR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.09-2.22), and worse in those with a caloric intake ≥2000 kcal/day (SPR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.37-0.62) or ≥2 comorbidities (SPR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.49-0.89). The adherence to maintaining a healthy weight was worse in those with ≥2 comorbidities and stage III-IV tumors. The physical activity adherence was worse in working women and those with ≥2 comorbidities. The alcohol restriction adherence was worse in smokers. Younger women, smokers and those with a low calorie intake were less adherent to the fruit/vegetable recommendation. The consumption of fiber and limited consumption of red/processed meat adherence was poor in all the subgroups. The adherence to a limited consumption of fast food and sugary drinks was worse in younger women and high-calorie-diet consumers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The differences in the adherence to recommendations according to patient characteristics justify the design of personalized interventions for breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040708","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: The 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) cancer prevention recommendations benefit primary prevention and survivor outcomes. This study evaluated the adherence to these recommendations during the year prior to breast cancer diagnosis and identified related clinical and sociodemographic factors.

Methods: A total of 915 patients with breast cancer were recruited from eight hospitals in four regions of Spain. The participants completed an epidemiologic questionnaire and a food frequency questionnaire. The compliance with the WCRF/AICR recommendations was assessed using a standardized score based on seven recommendations. Standardized prevalences and standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) for moderate and high adherence were calculated based on participant characteristics using binary and multinomial logistic regression models.

Results: The mean adherence was 3.5 points out of 7. The recommendations with the best and worst adherence were avoiding sugar-sweetened drinks (54.4% adherence) and maintaining a fiber-rich diet (4.4% consumed ≥30 g/day). The overall adherence was better in women aged ≥60 years (SPR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.09-2.22), and worse in those with a caloric intake ≥2000 kcal/day (SPR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.37-0.62) or ≥2 comorbidities (SPR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.49-0.89). The adherence to maintaining a healthy weight was worse in those with ≥2 comorbidities and stage III-IV tumors. The physical activity adherence was worse in working women and those with ≥2 comorbidities. The alcohol restriction adherence was worse in smokers. Younger women, smokers and those with a low calorie intake were less adherent to the fruit/vegetable recommendation. The consumption of fiber and limited consumption of red/processed meat adherence was poor in all the subgroups. The adherence to a limited consumption of fast food and sugary drinks was worse in younger women and high-calorie-diet consumers.

Conclusions: The differences in the adherence to recommendations according to patient characteristics justify the design of personalized interventions for breast cancer patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遵守世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究协会乳腺癌妇女建议的决定因素
背景/目的:2018年世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所(WCRF/AICR)癌症预防建议有利于初级预防和幸存者结局。这项研究评估了乳腺癌诊断前一年对这些建议的遵守情况,并确定了相关的临床和社会人口因素。方法:从西班牙4个地区的8家医院共招募915例乳腺癌患者。参与者完成了流行病学调查问卷和食物频率调查问卷。对WCRF/AICR建议的依从性使用基于7项建议的标准化评分进行评估。采用二元和多项logistic回归模型计算中度和高度依从性的标准化患病率和标准化患病率(SPRs)。结果:平均依从性为3.5分(总分7分)。建议的最佳和最差依从性是避免含糖饮料(54.4%的依从性)和保持富含纤维的饮食(4.4%的人摄入≥30克/天)。总体依从性在≥60岁的女性中更好(SPR = 1.55;95% CI = 1.09-2.22),且热量摄入≥2000 kcal/天的患者情况更糟(SPR = 0.48;95% CI = 0.37-0.62)或合并症≥2例(SPR = 0.66;95% ci = 0.49-0.89)。在合并症≥2例和III-IV期肿瘤患者中,维持健康体重的依从性较差。职业女性和有2种以上合并症的女性体力活动依从性较差。吸烟者的酒精限制依从性更差。年轻女性、吸烟者和低热量摄入的人不太坚持水果/蔬菜的建议。在所有亚组中,纤维的摄入和对红肉/加工肉的有限摄入的依从性都很差。在年轻女性和高热量饮食消费者中,坚持有限摄入快餐和含糖饮料的情况更糟。结论:根据患者特点对建议依从性的差异证明了针对乳腺癌患者设计个性化干预措施的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Supramaximal Resection in Glioblastoma: Expanding Surgical Boundaries in the Era of Precision Neuro-Oncology-A Systematic Review. Immunohistochemical Expression of IDO and PD-L1 in Distinct Compartments of Breast Cancer Tissue: Correlation with Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes. Comparison of Comprehensive Serum miRNA Sequencing and Apolipoprotein A2 Isoforms for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Breast Cancer Histopathology: Toward Improved Diagnosis and Prognosis. Long-Term Young Adult Cancer Survivors with Ovarian Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of the Study "Expression VI-Carolin Meets HANNA-Holistic Analysis of Long-Term Survival with Ovarian Cancer": The International NOGGO, ENGOT, and GCIG Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1