Assessment and early investigation of cauda equina syndrome- a systematic review of existing international guidelines and summary of the current evidence.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s00586-025-08732-0
Orla Hennessy, A T Devitt, K Synnott, M Timlin
{"title":"Assessment and early investigation of cauda equina syndrome- a systematic review of existing international guidelines and summary of the current evidence.","authors":"Orla Hennessy, A T Devitt, K Synnott, M Timlin","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08732-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is an emergency clinical syndrome with correlating radiological evidence of spinal compression. Urgent recognition and treatment is key. In many units, it lacks a clear pathway of investigation and referral, despite a constantly expanding evidence base for its management.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this article is to provide a systematic review of currently available guidelines internationally, and also an up-to-date review of current key evidence on topics central to the accurate assessment and investigation of CES.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was carried out to identify all previously published or proposed pathways internationally for CES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Included articles were reviewed and data extracted and collected in excel format. Data extracted included year of publication, author, time to MRI in pathway, inclusion or exclusion of post void residual measurement and specific cauda equina red flags used. An evidentiary review was also carried out on key topics including digital rectal examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following removal of duplicates a total of 307 articles underwent title and abstract screening from which 9 were eventually included for data extraction. All included papers recommended urgent MRI with the presence of red flag findings. Red flags included in all papers were perianal/perineal/saddle sensory disturbance and bladder or bowel dysfunction of varying specifications. 8/9 papers included radicular/sciatic pain, 5/9 included new motor weakness, 4/9 included DRE findings and PVR was included in 5/9 papers. PVR and DR examinations retain clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While specific guidelines show minor variability, overall the current literature presents a consensus that in cases of suspected cauda equina syndrome MRI should be carried out on an urgent basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1545-1551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08732-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is an emergency clinical syndrome with correlating radiological evidence of spinal compression. Urgent recognition and treatment is key. In many units, it lacks a clear pathway of investigation and referral, despite a constantly expanding evidence base for its management.

Purpose: The aim of this article is to provide a systematic review of currently available guidelines internationally, and also an up-to-date review of current key evidence on topics central to the accurate assessment and investigation of CES.

Study design: A systematic review of the literature was carried out to identify all previously published or proposed pathways internationally for CES.

Methods: Included articles were reviewed and data extracted and collected in excel format. Data extracted included year of publication, author, time to MRI in pathway, inclusion or exclusion of post void residual measurement and specific cauda equina red flags used. An evidentiary review was also carried out on key topics including digital rectal examination.

Results: Following removal of duplicates a total of 307 articles underwent title and abstract screening from which 9 were eventually included for data extraction. All included papers recommended urgent MRI with the presence of red flag findings. Red flags included in all papers were perianal/perineal/saddle sensory disturbance and bladder or bowel dysfunction of varying specifications. 8/9 papers included radicular/sciatic pain, 5/9 included new motor weakness, 4/9 included DRE findings and PVR was included in 5/9 papers. PVR and DR examinations retain clinical significance.

Conclusion: While specific guidelines show minor variability, overall the current literature presents a consensus that in cases of suspected cauda equina syndrome MRI should be carried out on an urgent basis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马尾综合征的评估和早期调查-对现有国际指南的系统回顾和当前证据的总结。
背景背景:马尾综合征(CES)是一种与脊柱压迫相关的放射学证据的急诊临床综合征。紧急识别和治疗是关键。在许多单位,它缺乏明确的调查和移交途径,尽管其管理的证据基础不断扩大。目的:本文的目的是对目前国际上可用的指南进行系统的回顾,并对当前关于准确评估和调查CES的核心主题的关键证据进行最新的回顾。研究设计:对文献进行系统回顾,以确定国际上所有先前发表或提出的CES途径。方法:对纳入的文献进行回顾,并以excel格式提取资料。提取的数据包括发表年份、作者、路径MRI时间、纳入或排除空洞后残留测量以及使用的特定马尾红旗。对包括直肠指检在内的关键课题也进行了证据审查。结果:去除重复后,共有307篇文章进行了标题和摘要筛选,其中9篇最终被纳入数据提取。所有纳入的论文都建议在出现危险信号的情况下进行紧急MRI检查。所有论文中的危险信号包括肛门周围/会阴/鞍区感觉障碍和不同规格的膀胱或肠功能障碍。8/9的论文包括神经根/坐骨骨疼痛,5/9的论文包括新的运动无力,4/9的论文包括DRE的发现,5/9的论文包括PVR。PVR和DR检查仍具有临床意义。结论:虽然具体的指南显示出较小的差异,但总体而言,目前的文献一致认为,在疑似马尾综合征的病例中,应紧急进行MRI检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Distinguishing reactive scoliosis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology and a proposed clinical framework. Infinity decompression: a stepwise biportal endoscopic over-the-top decompression - surgical technique and outcomes. Accuracy in spinal level determination, including transitional vertebrae: an ASReview supported systematic review. Intraoperative neuromonitoring in endoscopic cervical decompression: a signal-event-response perspective. Combination of dexamethasone and pregabalin for postoperative pain after laminectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1