Effect of previous cardiac surgery on the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair: a nationwide cohort study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezaf060
Chun-Yu Lin, Wei-Min Chen, Shu-Hao Chang, Sheng-Yueh Yu, Lai-Chu See
{"title":"Effect of previous cardiac surgery on the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair: a nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Chun-Yu Lin, Wei-Min Chen, Shu-Hao Chang, Sheng-Yueh Yu, Lai-Chu See","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The effect of previous cardiac surgery (PCS) on the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair remains controversial. This study compared the primary outcome (in-hospital mortality) and secondary outcomes (postoperative complications and post-discharge mortality/aortic reoperation rates up to 5 years) of patients who underwent ATAAD repair with and without PCS through a nationwide cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to enroll patients who underwent ATAAD repair with and without PCS (94 and 4532, respectively) between 1 July 2004 and 31 March 2017. A 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create well-balanced PCS (n = 74) and non-PCS (n = 296) groups. Results before and after PSM were aligned to determine the role of PCS in primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before PSM, the PCS group was older and had more comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and malignancy, but less stroke history than the non-PCS group. More patients in the PCS group received coronary artery bypass grafting during the repair than in the non-PCS group. The PCS group had a higher in-hospital mortality than the non-PCS group. After PSM, the in-hospital mortality was similar between the 2 groups (27.0% vs 26.7%; P = 0.953). For patients who survived to discharge, the all-cause mortality up to 5 years for PCS and non-PCS groups were 29.7% and 18.4% (P = 0.015) before and 29.6% and 23.1% (P = 0.313) after PSM, respectively. The 2 groups had similar aortic reoperation rates up to 5 years before (13.5% vs 11.7%; P = 0.727) and after PSM (13.8% vs 11.6%; P = 0.776).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with PCS who underwent ATAAD repair showed higher in-hospital and long-term mortality rates than those without PCS when not controlled for confounding factors. However, the disparity disappeared after PSM, indicating that worse outcomes might be due to its old age and different perioperative characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The effect of previous cardiac surgery (PCS) on the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair remains controversial. This study compared the primary outcome (in-hospital mortality) and secondary outcomes (postoperative complications and post-discharge mortality/aortic reoperation rates up to 5 years) of patients who underwent ATAAD repair with and without PCS through a nationwide cohort analysis.

Methods: We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to enroll patients who underwent ATAAD repair with and without PCS (94 and 4532, respectively) between 1 July 2004 and 31 March 2017. A 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create well-balanced PCS (n = 74) and non-PCS (n = 296) groups. Results before and after PSM were aligned to determine the role of PCS in primary and secondary outcomes.

Results: Before PSM, the PCS group was older and had more comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and malignancy, but less stroke history than the non-PCS group. More patients in the PCS group received coronary artery bypass grafting during the repair than in the non-PCS group. The PCS group had a higher in-hospital mortality than the non-PCS group. After PSM, the in-hospital mortality was similar between the 2 groups (27.0% vs 26.7%; P = 0.953). For patients who survived to discharge, the all-cause mortality up to 5 years for PCS and non-PCS groups were 29.7% and 18.4% (P = 0.015) before and 29.6% and 23.1% (P = 0.313) after PSM, respectively. The 2 groups had similar aortic reoperation rates up to 5 years before (13.5% vs 11.7%; P = 0.727) and after PSM (13.8% vs 11.6%; P = 0.776).

Conclusions: Patients with PCS who underwent ATAAD repair showed higher in-hospital and long-term mortality rates than those without PCS when not controlled for confounding factors. However, the disparity disappeared after PSM, indicating that worse outcomes might be due to its old age and different perioperative characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既往心脏手术对急性A型主动脉夹层修复结果的影响:一项全国性队列研究。
目的:既往心脏手术(PCS)对急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)修复预后的影响仍存在争议。本研究通过一项全国性队列分析,比较了接受和不接受PCS的ATAAD修复患者的主要结局(住院死亡率)和次要结局(术后并发症和出院后死亡率/主动脉再手术率长达5年)。方法:我们使用台湾全民健康保险研究数据库,在2004年07月1日至2017年03月31日期间,分别有94例和4532例接受ATAAD修复术的患者。采用1:4倾向评分匹配(PSM)建立平衡良好的PCS组(n = 74)和non-PCS组(n = 296)。对PSM前后的结果进行比对,以确定PCS在主要和次要结局中的作用。结果:PSM前,PCS组年龄较大,合并症较多,包括糖尿病、心力衰竭、心房颤动、恶性肿瘤等,但卒中史较非PCS组少。在修复过程中,PCS组接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者多于非PCS组。PCS组的住院死亡率高于非PCS组。PSM后,两组的住院死亡率相似(27.0% vs 26.7%;p = 0.953)。在存活至出院的患者中,PSM前和非PCS组5年全因死亡率分别为29.7%和18.4% (P = 0.015), PSM后分别为29.6%和23.1% (P = 0.313)。两组在5年前的主动脉再手术率相似(13.5% vs 11.7%;P = 0.727)和PSM后(13.8% vs 11.6%;p = 0.776)。结论:在不控制混杂因素的情况下,接受ATAAD修复的PCS患者的住院死亡率和长期死亡率高于未接受ATAAD修复的PCS患者。PSM后差异消失,提示PSM年龄大、围手术期特征不同可能导致预后较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
564
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.
期刊最新文献
Long-term survival from a randomized controlled trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer. Ventricular switch procedure: updated outcomes and lessons learned. Prevalence and anatomical characteristics of the left medial basal pulmonary segment: a retrospective cohort study using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: Why and How. Sex difference in aortic root replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis†.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1