A phase III study comparing preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion with preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1038/s41433-025-03646-z
Christophe Baudouin, Ingeborg Stalmans, Rupert Bourne, Jose Manuel Larrosa, Stefanie Schmickler, Aleksey Seleznev, Francesco Oddone, On behalf of the Phase III study group
{"title":"A phase III study comparing preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion with preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension","authors":"Christophe Baudouin, Ingeborg Stalmans, Rupert Bourne, Jose Manuel Larrosa, Stefanie Schmickler, Aleksey Seleznev, Francesco Oddone, On behalf of the Phase III study group","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-03646-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) versus preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). A Phase III non-inferiority study randomised patients with OAG/OHT 1:1 to receive preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion or preserved latanoprost. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in peak (9:00 A.M. ± 1 h) and trough (4:00 P.M. ± 1 h) IOP at Week 12 (non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval for treatment difference of ≤1.5 mmHg). Key secondary endpoints were change from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score and in ocular surface disease (OSD) average symptom score at Week 12 (in patients with baseline CFS ≥ 1 or OSD score > 0, respectively). Non-inferiority criteria for IOP-lowering were met. Least square (LS) mean (standard error [SE]) IOP change from baseline with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion (N = 193) versus preserved latanoprost (N = 193) at Week 12 was −8.8 (0.3) mmHg versus −8.2 (0.3) mmHg at peak (difference: −0.6 mmHg; nominal p = 0.023); −8.6 (0.2) mmHg versus −8.1 (0.3) mmHg at trough (difference: −0.5 mmHg; p = 0.080). LS mean change in CFS (SE) was −0.7 (0.07) with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion and −0.4 (0.08) with preserved latanoprost (nominal p < 0.001). LS mean change in OSD symptom score was −0.3 (0.1) with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion and −0.2 (0.1) with preserved latanoprost (nominal p = 0.090). Preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion demonstrated non-inferior IOP-lowering efficacy compared with preserved latanoprost, and improved signs and symptoms of OSD.","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":"39 8","pages":"1599-1607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41433-025-03646-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) versus preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). A Phase III non-inferiority study randomised patients with OAG/OHT 1:1 to receive preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion or preserved latanoprost. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in peak (9:00 A.M. ± 1 h) and trough (4:00 P.M. ± 1 h) IOP at Week 12 (non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval for treatment difference of ≤1.5 mmHg). Key secondary endpoints were change from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score and in ocular surface disease (OSD) average symptom score at Week 12 (in patients with baseline CFS ≥ 1 or OSD score > 0, respectively). Non-inferiority criteria for IOP-lowering were met. Least square (LS) mean (standard error [SE]) IOP change from baseline with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion (N = 193) versus preserved latanoprost (N = 193) at Week 12 was −8.8 (0.3) mmHg versus −8.2 (0.3) mmHg at peak (difference: −0.6 mmHg; nominal p = 0.023); −8.6 (0.2) mmHg versus −8.1 (0.3) mmHg at trough (difference: −0.5 mmHg; p = 0.080). LS mean change in CFS (SE) was −0.7 (0.07) with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion and −0.4 (0.08) with preserved latanoprost (nominal p < 0.001). LS mean change in OSD symptom score was −0.3 (0.1) with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion and −0.2 (0.1) with preserved latanoprost (nominal p = 0.090). Preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion demonstrated non-inferior IOP-lowering efficacy compared with preserved latanoprost, and improved signs and symptoms of OSD.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项比较无防腐剂拉坦前列素滴眼液乳剂与保存的拉坦前列素治疗开角型青光眼或高眼压的III期研究。
背景/目的:评价不含防腐剂的拉坦前列素滴眼液乳剂与保存的拉坦前列素在开角型青光眼(OAG)或高眼压(OHT)患者中降低眼压(IOP)的疗效和安全性。方法:一项III期非劣效性研究将OAG/OHT比例为1:1的患者随机分组,接受不含防腐剂的拉坦前列素滴眼液或保存的拉坦前列素。主要疗效终点是高峰(上午9:00±1小时)和低谷(下午4:00)与基线的变化±1 h)第12周IOP(非劣效性裕度:治疗差异≤1.5 mmHg的95%置信区间)。关键次要终点是第12周角膜荧光素染色(CFS)评分和眼表疾病(OSD)平均症状评分较基线的变化(基线CFS≥1或OSD评分分别为>)。结果:符合降低眼压的非劣效性标准。最小二乘(LS)平均值(标准误差[SE])与基线相比,第12周使用无保存剂的拉坦前列素滴眼液乳剂(N = 193)和保存的拉坦前列素(N = 193)的IOP变化峰值为-8.8 (0.3)mmHg和-8.2 (0.3)mmHg(差异:-0.6 mmHg;名义p = 0.023);-8.6 (0.2) mmHg vs -8.1 (0.3) mmHg谷值(差异:-0.5 mmHg;p = 0.080)。无防腐剂拉坦前列素滴眼液对CFS (SE)的LS平均变化为-0.7(0.07),保存的拉坦前列素滴眼液对CFS (SE)的LS平均变化为-0.4(0.08)(标称p)。结论:与保存的拉坦前列素相比,无防腐剂拉坦前列素滴眼液对降低眼压的效果不差,并且改善了OSD的体征和症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eye
Eye 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.
期刊最新文献
Racial and microvascular determinants of progression to treatment-warranted diabetic eye disease. A call to develop rigorous standards for excellence in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: RISE-IIH. Congenital optic disc retinal capillary haemangioma. Demarcation line following additive stromal keratoplasty. Ocular surface restoration following salivary gland transplantation for severe dry eye.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1