Gemma Nourse, Adrian Farrugia, Kate Seear, Emily Lenton, Elena Cama, Carla Treloar
{"title":"Stigmatising space-times: Addressing healthcare stigma beyond interpersonal interactions.","authors":"Gemma Nourse, Adrian Farrugia, Kate Seear, Emily Lenton, Elena Cama, Carla Treloar","doi":"10.1177/13634593251323000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stigma related to blood-borne viruses (BBVs) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been shown to undermine the quality of healthcare. Given the pervasiveness and multiple manifestations of stigma within healthcare settings, recent research has argued that stigma should be addressed 'universally' i.e. for all stigmatising attributes and conditions, across all healthcare services. As part of the development of a universal approach to stigma, we analyse 20 interviews conducted with key stakeholders with expertise in BBVs, STIs and stigma in Australian healthcare settings. Inspired by research that addresses stigma as a biopolitical and spatial-temporal phenomenon, we examine how stigma weaves through relationships between people, time, space and technologies of healthcare provision. We begin with a discussion of funding structures and time constraints, followed by an examination of matters relating to the geographical location of the clinic and, finally, an analysis of smaller scale service environment space-times. In doing so, we bring attention to significant spatial-temporal matters that shape the production of stigma and address the need to balance universal concerns about healthcare quality with the specific forms of stigma that can emerge in relation to particular health issues and populations, such as BBVs and STIs. Overall, we examine how ambitious responses to stigma such as that proposed by the 'universal precautions' approach broaden our focus beyond interpersonal interactions and help draw attention to a wider range of objects, spaces and temporal dynamics that must be addressed in any effort to address stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593251323000"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251323000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stigma related to blood-borne viruses (BBVs) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been shown to undermine the quality of healthcare. Given the pervasiveness and multiple manifestations of stigma within healthcare settings, recent research has argued that stigma should be addressed 'universally' i.e. for all stigmatising attributes and conditions, across all healthcare services. As part of the development of a universal approach to stigma, we analyse 20 interviews conducted with key stakeholders with expertise in BBVs, STIs and stigma in Australian healthcare settings. Inspired by research that addresses stigma as a biopolitical and spatial-temporal phenomenon, we examine how stigma weaves through relationships between people, time, space and technologies of healthcare provision. We begin with a discussion of funding structures and time constraints, followed by an examination of matters relating to the geographical location of the clinic and, finally, an analysis of smaller scale service environment space-times. In doing so, we bring attention to significant spatial-temporal matters that shape the production of stigma and address the need to balance universal concerns about healthcare quality with the specific forms of stigma that can emerge in relation to particular health issues and populations, such as BBVs and STIs. Overall, we examine how ambitious responses to stigma such as that proposed by the 'universal precautions' approach broaden our focus beyond interpersonal interactions and help draw attention to a wider range of objects, spaces and temporal dynamics that must be addressed in any effort to address stigma.
期刊介绍:
Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.