Assessing a Statewide Nursing Home Staffing Program Through Quantitative and Qualitative Survey Data.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105517
Lindsay J Peterson, Kelly M Smith
{"title":"Assessing a Statewide Nursing Home Staffing Program Through Quantitative and Qualitative Survey Data.","authors":"Lindsay J Peterson, Kelly M Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To use quantitative and qualitative data to assess nursing home administrators' perceptions of a program using personal care attendants (PCAs) to ease staffing challenges, and to better understand factors concerning perceptions of success of lack thereof.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Convergent mixed methods design, in which quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently and analyzed separately, with results combined for interpretation.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Florida nursing home administrators (N = 74).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a survey to collect data on administrators' use and perceptions of the PCA program. Data from closed-end questions assessing the value and use of PCAs and data on nursing home characteristics (eg, bed size, profit status) were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Open-ended responses were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. Quantitative and qualitative data were combined for further analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found greater use of PCAs (more PCAs hired) was associated with 6% greater odds of finding the program beneficial (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.0-1.12; P = .049), controlling for facility characteristics. Qualitative analysis identified 3 themes: benefits of the PCA program, barriers to the success of the program, and steps taken to improve the program's usefulness. In further analysis, we identified an overarching theme of administrator proactivity in the implementation of the PCA program. Integration of quantitative and qualitative results found a relationship between assessing the PCA program as beneficial and taking proactive steps to facilitate use of PCAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Success of the PCA program in easing staffing challenges may have depended on administrators being proactive, in contrast to those who negatively assessed the program and took a more passive approach. Results provide evidence of differing leadership styles in the use of the PCA program, suggesting leadership training could better equip nursing home leaders to implement staffing initiatives. More research is recommended on the relationship between administrative leadership, staffing, and quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105517"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To use quantitative and qualitative data to assess nursing home administrators' perceptions of a program using personal care attendants (PCAs) to ease staffing challenges, and to better understand factors concerning perceptions of success of lack thereof.

Design: Convergent mixed methods design, in which quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently and analyzed separately, with results combined for interpretation.

Setting and participants: Florida nursing home administrators (N = 74).

Methods: We developed a survey to collect data on administrators' use and perceptions of the PCA program. Data from closed-end questions assessing the value and use of PCAs and data on nursing home characteristics (eg, bed size, profit status) were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Open-ended responses were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. Quantitative and qualitative data were combined for further analysis.

Results: We found greater use of PCAs (more PCAs hired) was associated with 6% greater odds of finding the program beneficial (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.0-1.12; P = .049), controlling for facility characteristics. Qualitative analysis identified 3 themes: benefits of the PCA program, barriers to the success of the program, and steps taken to improve the program's usefulness. In further analysis, we identified an overarching theme of administrator proactivity in the implementation of the PCA program. Integration of quantitative and qualitative results found a relationship between assessing the PCA program as beneficial and taking proactive steps to facilitate use of PCAs.

Conclusions and implications: Success of the PCA program in easing staffing challenges may have depended on administrators being proactive, in contrast to those who negatively assessed the program and took a more passive approach. Results provide evidence of differing leadership styles in the use of the PCA program, suggesting leadership training could better equip nursing home leaders to implement staffing initiatives. More research is recommended on the relationship between administrative leadership, staffing, and quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Pharmacists Improving Osteoporosis Management in Long-Term Care Using Fracture Risk Assessments: A Feasibility Study Postural Sway Characteristics Distinguish Types of Dementia Effectiveness of Telehealth Interventions on Cognitive Function and Quality of Life in Adults With Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sex-Specific Body Composition Profile Determined by Pelvic Computed Tomography Associated with Mortality in Older Patients with Hip Fracture Factors Influencing Initial Rehabilitation Type After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1