Age Difference in the Association Between Nutritional Status and Dynapenia in Older Adults.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrients Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.3390/nu17040734
Chih-Ching Chang, Ting-Fu Lai, Jiaren Chen, Yung Liao, Jong-Hwan Park, Yen-Jung Chang
{"title":"Age Difference in the Association Between Nutritional Status and Dynapenia in Older Adults.","authors":"Chih-Ching Chang, Ting-Fu Lai, Jiaren Chen, Yung Liao, Jong-Hwan Park, Yen-Jung Chang","doi":"10.3390/nu17040734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although nutritional status plays a critical role in maintaining muscle strength, limited evidence exists regarding its association with dynapenia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate the association between different nutritional statuses and dynapenia among Taiwanese older adults, and assessed whether age modifies this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we enrolled individuals aged 65 years and older living in community settings through convenience sampling from 2020 to 2021, following a cross-sectional design. The Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) was used to assess whether the participants were at nutritional risk. Standardized assessments measured muscle strength (handgrip measurement), physical performance (6 m walking test), and muscle mass (bioelectrical impedance analysis) to confirm dynapenia classifications. The interaction terms were tested using likelihood ratio tests to examine for dynapenia between nutritional status and age. For overall sample and subgroup analyses, binary logistic regression was employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 211 participants (mean age: 80.7 ± 7.1 years), after adjusting for potential confounders, those at nutritional risk (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.31-7.36) were positively associated with dynapenia, whereas higher MNA-SF scores (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57-0.93) were negatively associated. Interactions regarding dynapenia were observed between nutritional status and age group (<i>p</i> = 0.014), with nutritional risk significantly associated with dynapenia only in the old-old group (≥75 years) (OR = 4.11, 95% CI: 1.39-12.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age is a potential moderator of nutritional status and dynapenia among older populations. Nutritional status appeared to be more profound in the old-old group in terms of the risk of dynapenia. These findings offer insights for monitoring nutritional status and implementing targeted interventions to prevent dynapenia in those aged over 75 years. Future studies using prospective designs should explore the underlying mechanisms linking nutritional status to dynapenia and assess the effectiveness of nutritional interventions in preventing muscle strength decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17040734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although nutritional status plays a critical role in maintaining muscle strength, limited evidence exists regarding its association with dynapenia.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the association between different nutritional statuses and dynapenia among Taiwanese older adults, and assessed whether age modifies this relationship.

Methods: In this study, we enrolled individuals aged 65 years and older living in community settings through convenience sampling from 2020 to 2021, following a cross-sectional design. The Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) was used to assess whether the participants were at nutritional risk. Standardized assessments measured muscle strength (handgrip measurement), physical performance (6 m walking test), and muscle mass (bioelectrical impedance analysis) to confirm dynapenia classifications. The interaction terms were tested using likelihood ratio tests to examine for dynapenia between nutritional status and age. For overall sample and subgroup analyses, binary logistic regression was employed.

Results: Among 211 participants (mean age: 80.7 ± 7.1 years), after adjusting for potential confounders, those at nutritional risk (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.31-7.36) were positively associated with dynapenia, whereas higher MNA-SF scores (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57-0.93) were negatively associated. Interactions regarding dynapenia were observed between nutritional status and age group (p = 0.014), with nutritional risk significantly associated with dynapenia only in the old-old group (≥75 years) (OR = 4.11, 95% CI: 1.39-12.15).

Conclusions: Age is a potential moderator of nutritional status and dynapenia among older populations. Nutritional status appeared to be more profound in the old-old group in terms of the risk of dynapenia. These findings offer insights for monitoring nutritional status and implementing targeted interventions to prevent dynapenia in those aged over 75 years. Future studies using prospective designs should explore the underlying mechanisms linking nutritional status to dynapenia and assess the effectiveness of nutritional interventions in preventing muscle strength decline.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人营养状况与运动障碍之间的年龄差异。
背景:尽管营养状况在维持肌肉力量方面起着关键作用,但关于其与动力不足的关系的证据有限。目的:本研究旨在探讨台湾老年人不同营养状况与运动障碍之间的关系,并评估年龄是否会改变这种关系。方法:在本研究中,我们采用横断面设计,通过便利抽样,从2020年到2021年,招募了生活在社区环境中的65岁及以上的老年人。mini - nutrition Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF)用于评估参与者是否存在营养风险。标准化评估测量了肌肉力量(握力测量)、身体表现(6米步行测试)和肌肉质量(生物电阻抗分析),以确认运动障碍分类。相互作用项采用似然比检验,以检验营养状况和年龄之间的动力。对于整体样本和亚组分析,采用二元逻辑回归。结果:211名参与者(平均年龄:80.7±7.1岁)中,在调整潜在混杂因素后,有营养风险的参与者(OR: 3.11;95% CI: 1.31-7.36)与运动障碍呈正相关,而较高的MNA-SF评分(OR: 0.73;95% CI: 0.57-0.93)呈负相关。营养状况和年龄组之间观察到动力障碍的相互作用(p = 0.014),营养风险与动力障碍仅在老年人组(≥75岁)中显著相关(OR = 4.11, 95% CI: 1.39-12.15)。结论:年龄是老年人营养状况和运动障碍的潜在调节因素。在老年组中,营养状况似乎对运动障碍的风险影响更大。这些发现为监测75岁以上老年人的营养状况和实施有针对性的干预措施提供了见解。未来采用前瞻性设计的研究应探索营养状况与动力不足之间的潜在机制,并评估营养干预在预防肌肉力量下降方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrients
Nutrients NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
15.30%
发文量
4599
审稿时长
16.74 days
期刊介绍: Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Iodine Content of Commercially Available Iodized Salts in Hungary Determined by Iodometric Titration: Implications for the Effectiveness of Salt Iodization. Effects of Fortified Formula Milk Supplementation on Neurocognitive Development and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Preschool Children: A Cluster-Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Ten-Year Trends in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D in Slovenia (2014-2023): Laboratory-Based Data from Tested Individuals and COVID-19-Period Changes. A Prolonged Nightly Fasting Plus Telehealth Coaching Intervention (PNF+) for Men on Androgen Deprivation Therapy for PCa: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. Prevalence of Nutrition Standards Use by Municipalities in Government-Owned or Operated Properties, United States, 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1