Use of C-Reactive Protein in Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) Etiologic Criteria for Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Claims Database Study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrients Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.3390/nu17040705
Shinya Suganuma, Naoki Kanda, Minoru Yoshida, Tomoka Miyagi, Kensuke Nakamura
{"title":"Use of C-Reactive Protein in Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) Etiologic Criteria for Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Claims Database Study.","authors":"Shinya Suganuma, Naoki Kanda, Minoru Yoshida, Tomoka Miyagi, Kensuke Nakamura","doi":"10.3390/nu17040705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) is suggested by major societies. The etiologic criteria for inflammation in critically ill patients remain unclear. Because an initial nutritional assessment is recommended within 48 h, it is also possible to use C-reactive protein (CRP) up to 3 days after admission. The purpose of the present study is to explore the utility of CRP in identifying malnutrition and to determine whether a nutritional assessment incorporating CRP criteria can effectively identify malnourished patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). <b>Methods</b>: This was a retrospective cohort study of ICU patients. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, Barthel index < 60 at discharge, and length of hospital stay of 14 days or more. The area under the curve (AUC) for the primary outcome was calculated using CRP between days 0 and 2. We divided the patients into four groups using inflammation criteria with the optimal cut-off and low body mass index (BMI) criteria of the GLIM: CRP+/-, and BMI+/-. <b>Results</b>: A total of 38,981 patients were included. The AUC of the highest CRP between days 0 and 2 was 0.65, which was higher than the CRP on day 0 and the highest CRP between days 0 and 1 (0.59 and 0.63). The AUC and optimal cut-offs varied depending on diagnoses, with a maximum of 0.75 in neurology. The optimal cut-off for the maximum CRP was 3.82 mg/dL. In the four groups of CRP+BMI+, CRP+BMI-, CRP-BMI+, and CRP-BMI-, the in-hospital mortality values were 22.7, 14.4, 10.8, and 4.8% (<i>p</i> < 0.001 between all the groups). <b>Conclusions</b>: In an initial nutritional assessment of critically ill patients, it would be appropriate to use the maximum CRP over 3 days from ICU admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17040705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) is suggested by major societies. The etiologic criteria for inflammation in critically ill patients remain unclear. Because an initial nutritional assessment is recommended within 48 h, it is also possible to use C-reactive protein (CRP) up to 3 days after admission. The purpose of the present study is to explore the utility of CRP in identifying malnutrition and to determine whether a nutritional assessment incorporating CRP criteria can effectively identify malnourished patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of ICU patients. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, Barthel index < 60 at discharge, and length of hospital stay of 14 days or more. The area under the curve (AUC) for the primary outcome was calculated using CRP between days 0 and 2. We divided the patients into four groups using inflammation criteria with the optimal cut-off and low body mass index (BMI) criteria of the GLIM: CRP+/-, and BMI+/-. Results: A total of 38,981 patients were included. The AUC of the highest CRP between days 0 and 2 was 0.65, which was higher than the CRP on day 0 and the highest CRP between days 0 and 1 (0.59 and 0.63). The AUC and optimal cut-offs varied depending on diagnoses, with a maximum of 0.75 in neurology. The optimal cut-off for the maximum CRP was 3.82 mg/dL. In the four groups of CRP+BMI+, CRP+BMI-, CRP-BMI+, and CRP-BMI-, the in-hospital mortality values were 22.7, 14.4, 10.8, and 4.8% (p < 0.001 between all the groups). Conclusions: In an initial nutritional assessment of critically ill patients, it would be appropriate to use the maximum CRP over 3 days from ICU admission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrients
Nutrients NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
15.30%
发文量
4599
审稿时长
16.74 days
期刊介绍: Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
A Study on Dining-Out Habits Among Beijing Residents: A Case of Fast Food. Age Difference in the Association Between Nutritional Status and Dynapenia in Older Adults. Dietary Fatty Acid Composition Alters Gut Microbiome in Mice with Obesity-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. The Additive Psychosocial Effects of Binge Eating and Food Insecurity Among Midlife and Older Women. Dietary Protein Intake Is a Determining Factor for Skeletal Muscle Mass in Japanese Older People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1