A qualitative descriptive study on the perspectives and experiences of multidisciplinary HCPs in providing nutritional care to older adults with cancer.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09254-7
Rachel Li Yin Wong, Chad Yixian Han, Jolene Thomas, Reegan Knowles
{"title":"A qualitative descriptive study on the perspectives and experiences of multidisciplinary HCPs in providing nutritional care to older adults with cancer.","authors":"Rachel Li Yin Wong, Chad Yixian Han, Jolene Thomas, Reegan Knowles","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09254-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the perceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) caring for older adults with cancer regarding dietary advice provision and dietetic referral.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative descriptive study providing rich descriptions of the experiences of multidisciplinary HCPs in providing care to older adults with cancer, excluding dietitians or nutritionists. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were used for recruitment. Semi-structured interviews and a focus group session were conducted. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Inductive codes were generated, and codes representing factors influencing HCPs' referral to dietetics and dietary advice provision were then mapped to domains in the Tailored Implementation of Chronic Diseases (TICD) checklist using a deductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty HCPs across various Australian healthcare settings participated, with a broad range of working experience (1.5 to 53 years) being interviewed. Most participants perceived their role in the provision of general dietary advice, and there was a consensus that nutrition is important. Key barriers (e.g. lack of time and resources, perceived lack of knowledge, scope of practice), including unique patient-related barriers (e.g. co-morbidities, fatalistic mindset), and key facilitators (e.g. need for education, evidence-based resources, multidisciplinary team approach) to dietary advice provision fell within five TICD domains (intervention, health professional factors, patient factors, professional interactions, incentives and resources). Common barriers (e.g. disconnections in multidisciplinary care, lack of structured referral pathways) and facilitators (e.g. clear referral pathways) to referral fell within four TICD domains (intervention, health professional factors, professional interactions, incentives and resources).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The barriers and facilitators to referral and provision of dietary advice by HCPs suggest the need for system-level changes via a multi-pronged approach. Simple and accessible nutrition resources, stronger nutrition education for HCPs, improved referral pathways and role clarity are required to support a multidisciplinary approach to nutritional care. More qualitative research on patient-level factors involving older adults with cancer is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 3","pages":"221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09254-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the perceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) caring for older adults with cancer regarding dietary advice provision and dietetic referral.

Methods: Qualitative descriptive study providing rich descriptions of the experiences of multidisciplinary HCPs in providing care to older adults with cancer, excluding dietitians or nutritionists. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were used for recruitment. Semi-structured interviews and a focus group session were conducted. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Inductive codes were generated, and codes representing factors influencing HCPs' referral to dietetics and dietary advice provision were then mapped to domains in the Tailored Implementation of Chronic Diseases (TICD) checklist using a deductive approach.

Results: Twenty HCPs across various Australian healthcare settings participated, with a broad range of working experience (1.5 to 53 years) being interviewed. Most participants perceived their role in the provision of general dietary advice, and there was a consensus that nutrition is important. Key barriers (e.g. lack of time and resources, perceived lack of knowledge, scope of practice), including unique patient-related barriers (e.g. co-morbidities, fatalistic mindset), and key facilitators (e.g. need for education, evidence-based resources, multidisciplinary team approach) to dietary advice provision fell within five TICD domains (intervention, health professional factors, patient factors, professional interactions, incentives and resources). Common barriers (e.g. disconnections in multidisciplinary care, lack of structured referral pathways) and facilitators (e.g. clear referral pathways) to referral fell within four TICD domains (intervention, health professional factors, professional interactions, incentives and resources).

Conclusion: The barriers and facilitators to referral and provision of dietary advice by HCPs suggest the need for system-level changes via a multi-pronged approach. Simple and accessible nutrition resources, stronger nutrition education for HCPs, improved referral pathways and role clarity are required to support a multidisciplinary approach to nutritional care. More qualitative research on patient-level factors involving older adults with cancer is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
The effects of enteral tube feeding on nutrition, survival, and quality of life outcomes in advanced upper gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic literature review. Out-of-pocket expenses and hospital write-offs are associated with patient reported financial toxicity. Symptom clusters, fear of disease progression, and quality of life in postoperative gastric cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. A qualitative descriptive study on the perspectives and experiences of multidisciplinary HCPs in providing nutritional care to older adults with cancer. Hematology patients' metaphorical perceptions of the disease and psychosocial support needs in the treatment process: a phenomenological study from a rural region of Türkiye.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1