Vertebroplacental ratio for prediction of perinatal outcome and operative delivery for suspected fetal compromise: prospective observational cohort study.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1002/uog.29189
B Packet, R Van Severen, J Richter
{"title":"Vertebroplacental ratio for prediction of perinatal outcome and operative delivery for suspected fetal compromise: prospective observational cohort study.","authors":"B Packet, R Van Severen, J Richter","doi":"10.1002/uog.29189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate differences in fetal vertebroplacental ratio (VPR) depending on the occurrence of operative delivery for suspected fetal compromise (ODFC) and composite perinatal outcome (CPO) at delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, between December 2022 and April 2024. Women with a term (37-42 gestational weeks) singleton pregnancy with an appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) fetus were recruited, before cervical dilatation reached 5 cm, for sonographic fetal weight estimation (EFW) and Doppler sonography of the umbilical artery (UA), umbilical vein (UV), middle cerebral artery (MCA) and vertebral artery (VA). The primary outcomes were differences in VPR multiples of the median (MoM) depending on the occurrence of ODFC and CPO at delivery (based on UA cord blood pH and base excess, 1-min and 5-min Apgar score, and neonatal intensive care unit admission). We explored the technical feasibility of fetal Doppler sonography in this setting and differences in Doppler findings from individual fetal vessels (UA, UV blood flow (UVF), MCA, VA) and related parameters (UVF/EFW and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR)). We also investigated whether adding individual sonographic variables to baseline clinical prediction models could improve discriminatory power (using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC)) and predictive accuracy (using the Brier score) for both outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 161 women were recruited. The mean ± SD maternal age was 32.2 ± 3.8 years and approximately half (53.4%) of the women were nulliparous. Most (88.2%) women had labor induced. The mean ± SD gestational age at delivery was 39.3 ± 1.0 weeks and the mean ± SD ultrasound-to-delivery interval was 10.4 ± 2.75 h. An adverse CPO occurred in 13.3% of cases and ODFC occurred in 17.4%. No difference in mean VPR MoM was observed between cases with normal vs adverse CPO (1.04 ± 0.26 vs 1.17 ± 0.25; P = 0.09), or between cases which underwent ODFC vs those which did not (1.06 ± 0.29 vs 1.06 ± 0.26; P = 0.97). Likewise, no differences in other Doppler variables (UA pulsatility index (PI) MoM, MCA-PI MoM, VA-PI MoM, CPR MoM) were observed for both outcomes, except for significantly higher UVF rates in the adverse CPO group (both absolute (P = 0.02) and corrected for EFW (P = 0.048)). For both outcomes, adding VPR MoM or any other sonographic variable to baseline prediction models, which consisted solely of clinical variables, did not improve predictive accuracy or discriminatory power. The baseline model AUC and Brier score values were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57-0.79) and 0.14 for adverse CPO, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.61-0.83) and 0.13 for ODFC, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although technically feasible to measure in most women with an AGA fetus admitted for spontaneous or induced labor at term, no difference in VPR MoM was observed depending on the occurrence of ODFC or CPO at delivery. Moreover, adding VPR MoM or any other sonographic variable to a baseline clinical prediction model did not improve predictive accuracy or discriminatory power for either outcome. Hence, peripartum ultrasound for the assessment of fetal weight and placental function has limited added value for predicting adverse labor outcomes in a low-risk obstetric population. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29189","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate differences in fetal vertebroplacental ratio (VPR) depending on the occurrence of operative delivery for suspected fetal compromise (ODFC) and composite perinatal outcome (CPO) at delivery.

Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, between December 2022 and April 2024. Women with a term (37-42 gestational weeks) singleton pregnancy with an appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) fetus were recruited, before cervical dilatation reached 5 cm, for sonographic fetal weight estimation (EFW) and Doppler sonography of the umbilical artery (UA), umbilical vein (UV), middle cerebral artery (MCA) and vertebral artery (VA). The primary outcomes were differences in VPR multiples of the median (MoM) depending on the occurrence of ODFC and CPO at delivery (based on UA cord blood pH and base excess, 1-min and 5-min Apgar score, and neonatal intensive care unit admission). We explored the technical feasibility of fetal Doppler sonography in this setting and differences in Doppler findings from individual fetal vessels (UA, UV blood flow (UVF), MCA, VA) and related parameters (UVF/EFW and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR)). We also investigated whether adding individual sonographic variables to baseline clinical prediction models could improve discriminatory power (using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC)) and predictive accuracy (using the Brier score) for both outcomes.

Results: A total of 161 women were recruited. The mean ± SD maternal age was 32.2 ± 3.8 years and approximately half (53.4%) of the women were nulliparous. Most (88.2%) women had labor induced. The mean ± SD gestational age at delivery was 39.3 ± 1.0 weeks and the mean ± SD ultrasound-to-delivery interval was 10.4 ± 2.75 h. An adverse CPO occurred in 13.3% of cases and ODFC occurred in 17.4%. No difference in mean VPR MoM was observed between cases with normal vs adverse CPO (1.04 ± 0.26 vs 1.17 ± 0.25; P = 0.09), or between cases which underwent ODFC vs those which did not (1.06 ± 0.29 vs 1.06 ± 0.26; P = 0.97). Likewise, no differences in other Doppler variables (UA pulsatility index (PI) MoM, MCA-PI MoM, VA-PI MoM, CPR MoM) were observed for both outcomes, except for significantly higher UVF rates in the adverse CPO group (both absolute (P = 0.02) and corrected for EFW (P = 0.048)). For both outcomes, adding VPR MoM or any other sonographic variable to baseline prediction models, which consisted solely of clinical variables, did not improve predictive accuracy or discriminatory power. The baseline model AUC and Brier score values were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57-0.79) and 0.14 for adverse CPO, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.61-0.83) and 0.13 for ODFC, respectively.

Conclusions: Although technically feasible to measure in most women with an AGA fetus admitted for spontaneous or induced labor at term, no difference in VPR MoM was observed depending on the occurrence of ODFC or CPO at delivery. Moreover, adding VPR MoM or any other sonographic variable to a baseline clinical prediction model did not improve predictive accuracy or discriminatory power for either outcome. Hence, peripartum ultrasound for the assessment of fetal weight and placental function has limited added value for predicting adverse labor outcomes in a low-risk obstetric population. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.10%
发文量
891
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.
期刊最新文献
Thoughts on the contribution of artificial intelligence (AI) to assessment of the fetal heart: a true scientific odyssey. Transvaginal cervical cerclage: double monofilament modified Wurm vs single braided McDonald technique. Vertebroplacental ratio for prediction of perinatal outcome and operative delivery for suspected fetal compromise: prospective observational cohort study. Prenatal treatment of axillary cystic lymphatic malformation using rapamycin. Twin pregnancy in woman with T-shaped uterus from CUME study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1