Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications.

IF 1.2 Q1 REHABILITATION Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.46292/sci24-00035
Andrei Krassioukov, Amanda H X Lee, Stacy Elliott, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, Gavin Naicker, Matthew Querée, Janice Eng
{"title":"Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications.","authors":"Andrei Krassioukov, Amanda H X Lee, Stacy Elliott, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, Gavin Naicker, Matthew Querée, Janice Eng","doi":"10.46292/sci24-00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breastfeeding can be a vital component for maternal and infant health, but successful breastfeeding may be especially difficult for mothers with spinal cord injury (SCI). No reliable research on prevalence or complications associated with breastfeeding for mothers with SCI currently exists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our systematic review aimed to answer the following: (1) What are the breastfeeding rates in women after SCI? (2) What are the rates and nature of postpartum complications reported by women with SCI in conjunction with breastfeeding?</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included; the reported rates at which women with SCI were able to breastfeed varied widely, ranging from 11% to 100%. Generally speaking, women with higher-level SCI (above T6) were less likely to breastfeed and would breastfeed less frequently than women with lower-level SCI and less frequently than women without SCI. Complications reported included problems with the let-down reflex, autonomic dysreflexia, and a higher incidence of postpartum depression in women with SCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More research on mothers with SCI is needed, especially matched-control research comparing mothers with and without SCI on successful breastfeeding and associated complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":46769,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":"31 1","pages":"52-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci24-00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breastfeeding can be a vital component for maternal and infant health, but successful breastfeeding may be especially difficult for mothers with spinal cord injury (SCI). No reliable research on prevalence or complications associated with breastfeeding for mothers with SCI currently exists.

Methods: Our systematic review aimed to answer the following: (1) What are the breastfeeding rates in women after SCI? (2) What are the rates and nature of postpartum complications reported by women with SCI in conjunction with breastfeeding?

Results: Ten studies were included; the reported rates at which women with SCI were able to breastfeed varied widely, ranging from 11% to 100%. Generally speaking, women with higher-level SCI (above T6) were less likely to breastfeed and would breastfeed less frequently than women with lower-level SCI and less frequently than women without SCI. Complications reported included problems with the let-down reflex, autonomic dysreflexia, and a higher incidence of postpartum depression in women with SCI.

Conclusion: More research on mothers with SCI is needed, especially matched-control research comparing mothers with and without SCI on successful breastfeeding and associated complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤后母乳喂养:患病率和相关并发症的系统回顾。
背景:母乳喂养是母婴健康的重要组成部分,但对于脊髓损伤(SCI)的母亲来说,成功的母乳喂养可能尤其困难。目前还没有关于脊髓损伤母亲母乳喂养的患病率或并发症的可靠研究。方法:本系统综述旨在回答以下问题:(1)脊髓损伤后妇女的母乳喂养率是多少?(2)脊髓损伤妇女在母乳喂养的同时报告的产后并发症的发生率和性质是什么?结果:纳入10项研究;报道的脊髓损伤妇女能够母乳喂养的比率差别很大,从11%到100%不等。一般来说,重度脊髓损伤(T6以上)的女性母乳喂养的可能性较小,母乳喂养的频率低于重度脊髓损伤的女性,也低于非重度脊髓损伤的女性。报道的并发症包括下丘脑反射问题、自主神经反射障碍和脊髓损伤妇女产后抑郁症的高发生率。结论:需要对脊髓损伤母亲进行更多的研究,特别是对有无脊髓损伤母亲成功母乳喂养及相关并发症的配对对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Now in our 22nd year as the leading interdisciplinary journal of SCI rehabilitation techniques and care. TSCIR is peer-reviewed, practical, and features one key topic per issue. Published topics include: mobility, sexuality, genitourinary, functional assessment, skin care, psychosocial, high tetraplegia, physical activity, pediatric, FES, sci/tbi, electronic medicine, orthotics, secondary conditions, research, aging, legal issues, women & sci, pain, environmental effects, life care planning
期刊最新文献
Intravesical Therapeutics Among People With Spinal Cord Injury and Disease: Time for a Change. Protocol for Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Using Targeted Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation to Treat Hypotension During Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation in Individuals With SCI. Best Practice Expert Opinion and Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure Stability in Clinical Trials and Foundational Research After Spinal Cord Injury. Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction, Cognitive Appraisals of Disability, and Life Satisfaction in Individuals With Pediatric-Onset Spinal Cord Injury. Content Analysis of ICF-Based Data in the Multidisciplinary Health Records of People With Spinal Cord Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1