Feasibility of a Machine Learning Classifier for Predicting Post-Induction Hypotension in Non-Cardiac Surgery.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Yonsei Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3349/ymj.2024.0020
Insun Park, Jae Hyon Park, Young Hyun Koo, Chang-Hoon Koo, Bon-Wook Koo, Jin-Hee Kim, Ah-Young Oh
{"title":"Feasibility of a Machine Learning Classifier for Predicting Post-Induction Hypotension in Non-Cardiac Surgery.","authors":"Insun Park, Jae Hyon Park, Young Hyun Koo, Chang-Hoon Koo, Bon-Wook Koo, Jin-Hee Kim, Ah-Young Oh","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2024.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a machine learning (ML) classifier for predicting post-induction hypotension (PIH) in non-cardiac surgeries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Preoperative data and early vital signs were obtained from 3669 cases in the VitalDB database, an open-source registry. PIH was defined as sustained mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg within 20 minutes since induction or from induction to incision. Six different ML algorithms were used to create binary classifiers to predict PIH. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ML classifiers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2321 (63.3%) cases exhibited PIH. Among ML classifiers, the random forest regressor and extremely gradient boosting regressor showed the highest AUROC, both recording a value of 0.772. Excluding these models, the light gradient boosting machine regressor showed the second highest AUROC [0.769; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.767-0.771], followed by the gradient boosting regressor (0.768; 95% CI, 0.763-0.772), AdaBoost regressor (0.752; 95% CI, 0.743-0.761), and automatic relevance determination regression (0.685; 95% CI, 0.669-0.701). The top three important features were mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), minimum MAP, and minimum DBP from anesthetic induction to tracheal intubation, and these features were lower in cases with PIH (all <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML classifiers exhibited moderate performance in predicting PIH, and have the potential for real-time prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"66 3","pages":"160-171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2024.0020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a machine learning (ML) classifier for predicting post-induction hypotension (PIH) in non-cardiac surgeries.

Materials and methods: Preoperative data and early vital signs were obtained from 3669 cases in the VitalDB database, an open-source registry. PIH was defined as sustained mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg within 20 minutes since induction or from induction to incision. Six different ML algorithms were used to create binary classifiers to predict PIH. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ML classifiers.

Results: A total of 2321 (63.3%) cases exhibited PIH. Among ML classifiers, the random forest regressor and extremely gradient boosting regressor showed the highest AUROC, both recording a value of 0.772. Excluding these models, the light gradient boosting machine regressor showed the second highest AUROC [0.769; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.767-0.771], followed by the gradient boosting regressor (0.768; 95% CI, 0.763-0.772), AdaBoost regressor (0.752; 95% CI, 0.743-0.761), and automatic relevance determination regression (0.685; 95% CI, 0.669-0.701). The top three important features were mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), minimum MAP, and minimum DBP from anesthetic induction to tracheal intubation, and these features were lower in cases with PIH (all p<0.001).

Conclusion: ML classifiers exhibited moderate performance in predicting PIH, and have the potential for real-time prediction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习分类器预测非心脏手术诱导后低血压的可行性。
目的:开发用于预测非心脏手术诱导后低血压(PIH)的机器学习(ML)分类器。材料和方法:从开源注册数据库VitalDB中获取3669例患者的术前资料和早期生命体征。结果:共有2321例(63.3%)患者表现为PIH。在ML分类器中,随机森林回归器和极端梯度增强回归器的AUROC最高,均为0.772。排除这些模型,光梯度增强机回归量AUROC第二高[0.769;95%置信区间(CI), 0.767-0.771],其次是梯度增强回归量(0.768;95% CI, 0.763-0.772), AdaBoost回归量(0.752;95% CI, 0.743-0.761),自动相关性测定回归(0.685;95% ci, 0.669-0.701)。最重要的三个特征是平均舒张压(DBP)、最小MAP和从麻醉诱导到气管插管的最小DBP,这些特征在PIH患者中较低(所有p)。结论:ML分类器在预测PIH方面表现中等,具有实时预测的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Bovine Pericardial and Porcine Valves Using a Mock Circulatory System Mimicking the Aortic and Pulmonary Positions. Predicting Post-Induction Hypotension in Diverse Surgical Populations: A Multiclass Classification Universal Model Using Machine Learning Techniques. Immunological Basis of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Immunoglobulin E and Beyond. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Offspring According to Cerclage Placement in Twin Pregnancy: A National Cohort Study Over 15 Years. Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in New Users of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors: A Nationwide Historical Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1