Stephanie M Spehar, Milan Seth, John F Collins, Simon R Dixon, Elizabeth Pielsticker, Daniel Lee, Mark Zainea, Thomas LaLonde, Dilip Arora, Devraj Sukul, Hitinder S Gurm
{"title":"Evaluating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Safety, Quality, and Appropriateness Across Michigan Using Blinded Cross-Institutional Peer Review.","authors":"Stephanie M Spehar, Milan Seth, John F Collins, Simon R Dixon, Elizabeth Pielsticker, Daniel Lee, Mark Zainea, Thomas LaLonde, Dilip Arora, Devraj Sukul, Hitinder S Gurm","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several quality improvement initiatives have focused on the quality gap in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet significant variations in quality persist. Our objective was to use a novel blinded peer review system to evaluate PCI quality, safety, and appropriateness across Michigan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-vessel PCI cases were randomly selected from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium registry across Michigan (2018-2020), and anonymized angiograms and pertinent case records were uploaded to a secure server. Cases were reviewed by blinded interventional cardiologists internal and external to the institution, using a standardized peer review form and rated on procedural quality, safety, and appropriateness. We compared appropriateness ratings between reviewers and registry-based appropriateness criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted 1627 independent peer reviews of 961 cases; 23.7% of cases were for non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, and 36.4% were for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. The majority (96.4%) of reviewers rated angiogram quality as excellent or adequate. Reviewers noted a complication or suboptimal result in 11.1% of reviews; 44.0% of these were deemed avoidable. Most PCI procedures were considered appropriate or may be appropriate, (87.1%) by all those reviewing. Reviewers were less likely to categorize PCI cases as appropriate compared with registry-based appropriate use criteria definitions (73.1% versus 93.3%). The percentage of cases rated as both appropriate/may be appropriate and technically competent ranged from 76.7% to 100% across sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the overall quality and appropriateness of PCI in Michigan are high, key opportunities to improve care were identified. Additional studies are needed to assess the utility of expanding this approach across the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e011031"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Several quality improvement initiatives have focused on the quality gap in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet significant variations in quality persist. Our objective was to use a novel blinded peer review system to evaluate PCI quality, safety, and appropriateness across Michigan.
Methods: Single-vessel PCI cases were randomly selected from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium registry across Michigan (2018-2020), and anonymized angiograms and pertinent case records were uploaded to a secure server. Cases were reviewed by blinded interventional cardiologists internal and external to the institution, using a standardized peer review form and rated on procedural quality, safety, and appropriateness. We compared appropriateness ratings between reviewers and registry-based appropriateness criteria.
Results: We conducted 1627 independent peer reviews of 961 cases; 23.7% of cases were for non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, and 36.4% were for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. The majority (96.4%) of reviewers rated angiogram quality as excellent or adequate. Reviewers noted a complication or suboptimal result in 11.1% of reviews; 44.0% of these were deemed avoidable. Most PCI procedures were considered appropriate or may be appropriate, (87.1%) by all those reviewing. Reviewers were less likely to categorize PCI cases as appropriate compared with registry-based appropriate use criteria definitions (73.1% versus 93.3%). The percentage of cases rated as both appropriate/may be appropriate and technically competent ranged from 76.7% to 100% across sites.
Conclusions: While the overall quality and appropriateness of PCI in Michigan are high, key opportunities to improve care were identified. Additional studies are needed to assess the utility of expanding this approach across the United States.
背景:一些质量改进的举措集中在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的质量差距上,但质量的显著差异仍然存在。我们的目标是使用一种新的盲法同行评议系统来评估整个密歇根州PCI的质量、安全性和适宜性。方法:从密歇根州蓝十字蓝盾心血管协会(Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium)注册表中随机选择2018-2020年的单血管PCI病例,将匿名血管造影和相关病例记录上传到安全服务器。病例由该机构内外的介入心脏病专家进行盲法审查,采用标准化的同行评议表格,并对程序质量、安全性和适当性进行评分。我们比较了审稿人和基于注册的适当性标准之间的适当性评级。结果:我们对961例病例进行了1627次独立同行评议;非st段抬高型心肌梗死占23.7%,st段抬高型心肌梗死占36.4%。大多数(96.4%)评论者认为血管造影质量为优秀或足够。11.1%的审稿人指出了并发症或次优结果;其中44.0%是可以避免的。大多数PCI手术被认为是合适的或可能是合适的(87.1%)。与基于注册表的适当使用标准定义相比,评论者不太可能将PCI病例分类为适当的(73.1%对93.3%)。被评为“合适/可能合适”和“技术上胜任”的案例百分比在各个站点的范围从76.7%到100%不等。结论:虽然密歇根州PCI的整体质量和适宜性很高,但我们确定了改善护理的关键机会。需要进一步的研究来评估在美国推广这种方法的效用。
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.