The CRIP effect: How a pattern in central vision interferes with perception of a pattern in the periphery.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1167/jov.25.2.10
Carolina Maria Oletto, Giulio Contemori, Esma Dilara Yavuz, Luca Battaglini, Michael Herzog, Marco Bertamini
{"title":"The CRIP effect: How a pattern in central vision interferes with perception of a pattern in the periphery.","authors":"Carolina Maria Oletto, Giulio Contemori, Esma Dilara Yavuz, Luca Battaglini, Michael Herzog, Marco Bertamini","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our percept of the world is the result of interactions between central and peripheral vision. They can be facilitatory, because central vision is informative about what is in the periphery, or detrimental, such as when shape elements are pooled. We introduce a novel phenomenon, in which elements in the central region impair perception in the periphery (central region interference with periphery [CRIP]). We showed participants a squared grid containing small lines (vertical or diagonal) or crosses in the central region and diagonal lines in the periphery. The regions were divided by a gap that varied in size and position. Participants reported the orientation of the diagonal lines in the periphery (/ or \\). The central pattern caused interference and hindered discrimination. For a fixed eccentricity of the peripheral elements, the smaller the gap the larger the impairment. The effect was only present when the central and peripheral lines had a shared orientation (i.e., diagonal), suggesting that similarity plays a role. Surprisingly, performance was worse if central and peripheral lines had the same orientation. We conclude that people do not rely on extrapolation when perceiving elements in the periphery and that iso-orientation may cause greater interference.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 2","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.2.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our percept of the world is the result of interactions between central and peripheral vision. They can be facilitatory, because central vision is informative about what is in the periphery, or detrimental, such as when shape elements are pooled. We introduce a novel phenomenon, in which elements in the central region impair perception in the periphery (central region interference with periphery [CRIP]). We showed participants a squared grid containing small lines (vertical or diagonal) or crosses in the central region and diagonal lines in the periphery. The regions were divided by a gap that varied in size and position. Participants reported the orientation of the diagonal lines in the periphery (/ or \). The central pattern caused interference and hindered discrimination. For a fixed eccentricity of the peripheral elements, the smaller the gap the larger the impairment. The effect was only present when the central and peripheral lines had a shared orientation (i.e., diagonal), suggesting that similarity plays a role. Surprisingly, performance was worse if central and peripheral lines had the same orientation. We conclude that people do not rely on extrapolation when perceiving elements in the periphery and that iso-orientation may cause greater interference.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CRIP效应:中央视觉模式如何干扰外围视觉模式的感知。
我们对世界的感知是中央视觉和周边视觉相互作用的结果。它们可以是促进的,因为中心视觉可以提供关于外围的信息,或者是有害的,比如当形状元素聚集在一起时。我们介绍了一种新的现象,在这种现象中,中枢区域的元素损害了外围的感知(中枢区域干扰外围[CRIP])。我们向参与者展示了一个正方形网格,其中包含中心区域的小线(垂直或对角线)或十字,以及外围的对角线。这些地区被大小和位置不同的缝隙所分割。参与者报告了外围(/或\)对角线的方向。中心格局造成干扰,阻碍歧视。对于偏心固定的外围元件,间隙越小损害越大。只有当中心线和外围线有共同的方向(即对角线)时,这种效果才会出现,这表明相似性起了作用。令人惊讶的是,如果中央和外围线的方向相同,性能会更差。我们得出的结论是,人们在感知外围元素时不依赖外推,而等取向可能会造成更大的干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Asymmetries in hue percepts and early cortical color coding: Evidence from chromatic visual evoked potentials. Social wayfinding in virtual reality: Navigational decisions and eye movements in a dynamic environment. Saccades to spatially extended objects: The roles of observer goals and part-structure cues in determining within-object landing position. The development of object representations in children. Different effects of flash-grab and frame stimuli on position shift and shape distortion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1