Effects of Nursing Interventions on Improving Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING Research and Theory for Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1891/RTNP-2024-0093
Wei Geng, Hongping Jia, Xianjing Zeng, Jia Li
{"title":"Effects of Nursing Interventions on Improving Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Wei Geng, Hongping Jia, Xianjing Zeng, Jia Li","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2024-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Various nursing interventions can improve the treatment process of patients with heart failure. However, the effectiveness of these interventions can be different. Therefore, it is required to summarize these relationships. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of various types of nursing interventions on improving patients with heart failure. <b>Methods:</b> Two groups of keywords were searched in five databases. After removing irrelevant articles, the required information was extracted from the remaining papers. Also, the quality level of the papers was determined using the critical appraisal tools provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. In addition to the descriptive findings, a case-control meta-analysis was also conducted on the values of compliance and satisfaction rates reported in some studies. <b>Results:</b> Forty-nine papers were included in the study. The results of all studies showed that various types of nursing can effectively influence the improvement of patients with heart failure. Among these interventions, comprehensive nursing, evidence-based nursing, and continuous nursing had the highest effectiveness. However, motivational interventions, telephone interventions, educational nursing interventions, and self-care interventions despite low cost could influence patient improvement. The results showed that nursing intervention in the case group compared with the control group could significantly decrease the complication rate (-11.22 [95% CI: -13.56, -8.87]) and increase the satisfaction rate (2.46 [95% CI: 1.79, 3.12]) in the patients. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> It is recommended that a set of nursing intervention measures can significantly improve the physical and mental conditions of patients with heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2024-0093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Various nursing interventions can improve the treatment process of patients with heart failure. However, the effectiveness of these interventions can be different. Therefore, it is required to summarize these relationships. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of various types of nursing interventions on improving patients with heart failure. Methods: Two groups of keywords were searched in five databases. After removing irrelevant articles, the required information was extracted from the remaining papers. Also, the quality level of the papers was determined using the critical appraisal tools provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. In addition to the descriptive findings, a case-control meta-analysis was also conducted on the values of compliance and satisfaction rates reported in some studies. Results: Forty-nine papers were included in the study. The results of all studies showed that various types of nursing can effectively influence the improvement of patients with heart failure. Among these interventions, comprehensive nursing, evidence-based nursing, and continuous nursing had the highest effectiveness. However, motivational interventions, telephone interventions, educational nursing interventions, and self-care interventions despite low cost could influence patient improvement. The results showed that nursing intervention in the case group compared with the control group could significantly decrease the complication rate (-11.22 [95% CI: -13.56, -8.87]) and increase the satisfaction rate (2.46 [95% CI: 1.79, 3.12]) in the patients. Implications for Practice: It is recommended that a set of nursing intervention measures can significantly improve the physical and mental conditions of patients with heart failure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Nursing Interventions on Improving Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cognitive Health Motivation: A Concept Analysis Using the Walker and Avant Method. Comparison of Symptom Distress Ranking Between Oncology Nurses and Pediatric Patients Receiving Chemotherapy. The Effect of Comfort Theory-Based Nursing Care on Intolerance of Uncertainty and Comfort Levels in Individuals Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Toward a Situation-Specific Theory of Nursing Organizational Well-Being: An Early-Stage Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1