Factors associated with poor pain experience after surgery.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-106095
Axel Maurice-Szamburski, Romain Rozier, Victor Gridel, Vladimir Radev, Emmanuelle Badia, Anderson Loundou, Pascal Auquier, Xavier Capdevila
{"title":"Factors associated with poor pain experience after surgery.","authors":"Axel Maurice-Szamburski, Romain Rozier, Victor Gridel, Vladimir Radev, Emmanuelle Badia, Anderson Loundou, Pascal Auquier, Xavier Capdevila","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify factors associated with poor postoperative pain experience by examining patient-related and procedural variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory secondary analysis was conducted on data from 971 adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia across five French teaching hospitals. Preoperative anxiety was assessed using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Pain, sleep quality and well-being were measured preoperatively and postoperatively using visual analog scales (VAS). The primary endpoint was the patient experience measured by the Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anesthésie Generale (EVAN-G) questionnaire on postoperative day 1, with poor pain experience defined as a score below the 25th percentile on the EVAN-G pain dimension. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with poor pain experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Poor pain experience was reported by 271 patients (27.9%). Multivariate analysis identified intraoperative use of remifentanil and sufentanil as an independent predictor of poor pain experience with an OR of 26.96 (95% CI 2.17 to 334.23, p=0.01). Additionally, age (OR 0.97, p=0.003), absence of premedication (OR 0.49, p=0.035) and orthopedic surgery (OR 0.29, p=0.005) were associated with a lower likelihood of poor pain experience. Conversely, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 status (OR 5.09, p=0.028), postoperative anxiolytic use (OR 8.20, p<0.001), amnesia (OR 1.58, p=0.001), higher VAS pain (p<0.001) and lower well-being scores (p=0.007) on day 1 were predictors of poor pain experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intraoperative use of remifentanil and sufentanil is independently associated with poorer postoperative pain experience. These findings highlight the need to reassess intraoperative analgesic strategies to enhance patient outcomes and reduce postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors associated with poor postoperative pain experience by examining patient-related and procedural variables.

Methods: An exploratory secondary analysis was conducted on data from 971 adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia across five French teaching hospitals. Preoperative anxiety was assessed using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Pain, sleep quality and well-being were measured preoperatively and postoperatively using visual analog scales (VAS). The primary endpoint was the patient experience measured by the Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anesthésie Generale (EVAN-G) questionnaire on postoperative day 1, with poor pain experience defined as a score below the 25th percentile on the EVAN-G pain dimension. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with poor pain experience.

Results: Poor pain experience was reported by 271 patients (27.9%). Multivariate analysis identified intraoperative use of remifentanil and sufentanil as an independent predictor of poor pain experience with an OR of 26.96 (95% CI 2.17 to 334.23, p=0.01). Additionally, age (OR 0.97, p=0.003), absence of premedication (OR 0.49, p=0.035) and orthopedic surgery (OR 0.29, p=0.005) were associated with a lower likelihood of poor pain experience. Conversely, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 status (OR 5.09, p=0.028), postoperative anxiolytic use (OR 8.20, p<0.001), amnesia (OR 1.58, p=0.001), higher VAS pain (p<0.001) and lower well-being scores (p=0.007) on day 1 were predictors of poor pain experience.

Conclusion: The intraoperative use of remifentanil and sufentanil is independently associated with poorer postoperative pain experience. These findings highlight the need to reassess intraoperative analgesic strategies to enhance patient outcomes and reduce postoperative complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术后疼痛体验差的相关因素。
目的:通过检查患者相关变量和手术变量来确定与术后不良疼痛体验相关的因素。方法:对法国5家教学医院971例全麻择期手术患者资料进行探索性二次分析。术前焦虑评估采用阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑与信息量表(APAIS)。术前和术后分别用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛、睡眠质量和幸福感。研究的主要终点是术后第1天通过EVAN-G (Evaluation du v de l’anesth一概一概)问卷测量的患者体验,疼痛体验差定义为EVAN-G疼痛维度得分低于第25百分位。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,以确定与不良疼痛体验相关的因素。结果:271例(27.9%)患者有不良的疼痛体验。多因素分析表明,术中使用瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼是不良疼痛体验的独立预测因子,OR为26.96 (95% CI 2.17 ~ 334.23, p=0.01)。此外,年龄(OR 0.97, p=0.003)、术前未用药(OR 0.49, p=0.035)和骨科手术(OR 0.29, p=0.005)与不良疼痛体验的可能性较低相关。相反,美国麻醉医师学会(ASA) 3级评分(OR 5.09, p=0.028),术后抗焦虑药使用(OR 8.20, p)。结论:术中使用瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼与术后疼痛体验较差独立相关。这些发现强调需要重新评估术中镇痛策略,以提高患者预后并减少术后并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Imaging of selective nerves in the lower extremity using wideband linear array ultrasound. Clinical outcomes for substantiation of imaging findings: the 'wasted' advantage over cadaveric studies. Response to the letter: Clinical outcomes for substantiation of imaging findings - the 'wasted' advantage over cadaveric studies. Taking a hard look at the 2024 match: a critical moment for the future of pain medicine training. Real time continuous monitoring of injection pressure at the needle tip is better than ultrasound in early detecting intraneural injection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1