Lower-Extremity Muscle Strength Symmetry Assessment Through Isokinetic Dynamometry.

IF 3.4 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Life-Basel Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.3390/life15020318
Yuanyuan Ren, Sheng Zhou, Guangzhen Cheng, Yueqin Tang, Guangge Wang, Aming Lu
{"title":"Lower-Extremity Muscle Strength Symmetry Assessment Through Isokinetic Dynamometry.","authors":"Yuanyuan Ren, Sheng Zhou, Guangzhen Cheng, Yueqin Tang, Guangge Wang, Aming Lu","doi":"10.3390/life15020318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to establish a dominant and non-dominant limb muscle strength evaluation model to evaluate the asymmetry of lower extremity muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The hip, knee, ankle flexors and extensors of 86 runners were evaluated separately in different contraction modes and at different movement speeds. A principal component analysis was used to establish a model for evaluating dominant and non-dominant lower extremity muscle strength and to comprehensively evaluate the asymmetry of lower extremity muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six main factors were present in both dominant and non-dominant indicators of lower extremity muscle strength, with dominant indicators of lower extremity muscle strength explaining 80.413% of the total variance and non-dominant indicators explaining 78.607% of the total variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a population of healthy male runners, there were differences in the symmetry of lower limbs in the comprehensive assessment model. The main contribution of the non-dominant side was the knee muscles, and the dominant side was the hip and knee muscles, so this difference should be considered in constructing future muscle strength evaluation models. It is critical to understanding the design and function of the human muscle system, and can reduce the number of meaningful tests we perform on diverse populations and help us reduce asymmetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":56144,"journal":{"name":"Life-Basel","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life15020318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to establish a dominant and non-dominant limb muscle strength evaluation model to evaluate the asymmetry of lower extremity muscle strength.

Methods: The hip, knee, ankle flexors and extensors of 86 runners were evaluated separately in different contraction modes and at different movement speeds. A principal component analysis was used to establish a model for evaluating dominant and non-dominant lower extremity muscle strength and to comprehensively evaluate the asymmetry of lower extremity muscle strength.

Results: Six main factors were present in both dominant and non-dominant indicators of lower extremity muscle strength, with dominant indicators of lower extremity muscle strength explaining 80.413% of the total variance and non-dominant indicators explaining 78.607% of the total variance.

Conclusions: In a population of healthy male runners, there were differences in the symmetry of lower limbs in the comprehensive assessment model. The main contribution of the non-dominant side was the knee muscles, and the dominant side was the hip and knee muscles, so this difference should be considered in constructing future muscle strength evaluation models. It is critical to understanding the design and function of the human muscle system, and can reduce the number of meaningful tests we perform on diverse populations and help us reduce asymmetry.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用等速动力学法评估下肢肌肉力量对称性。
目的:建立优势和非优势肢体肌力评价模型,评价下肢肌力不对称性。方法:对86例跑步者在不同收缩方式和不同运动速度下的髋、膝、踝关节屈、伸肌分别进行评估。采用主成分分析法建立下肢优势与非优势肌力评价模型,综合评价下肢肌力不对称性。结果:下肢肌力优势指标和非优势指标均存在6个主要因素,下肢肌力优势指标解释总方差的80.413%,非优势指标解释总方差的78.607%。结论:在健康男性跑步者人群中,综合评价模型在下肢对称性方面存在差异。非优势侧的主要贡献是膝关节肌肉,优势侧是髋关节和膝关节肌肉,因此在构建未来的肌力评估模型时应考虑这一差异。这对于理解人体肌肉系统的设计和功能至关重要,可以减少我们对不同人群进行的有意义的测试的数量,并帮助我们减少不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Life-Basel
Life-Basel Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1798
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Life (ISSN 2075-1729) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific studies related to fundamental themes in Life Sciences, especially those concerned with the origins of life and evolution of biosystems. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Lee et al. Protective Effects of Oenothera biennis Against Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Oxidative Stress and Cell Death in Skin Keratinocytes. Life 2020, 10, 255. Integrating Wearable Sensors and Clinical Tools for Assessing Pelvic Gait Symmetry During ACL Recovery. Dynamics and Predictive Values of Urinary Podocyte Biomarkers Following SGLT2 Inhibition in CKD. Integrative Pharmacological and Computational Analysis of Abelmoschus esculentus Phytochemicals: Enzyme Inhibition, Molecular Docking, and Dynamics Simulation Against Key Antidiabetic Targets. Eccentric Hamstring Strength and Interlimb Asymmetry in Professional Football Players: A NordBord-Based Longitudinal Analysis of Two Professional Teams.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1