{"title":"Cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor DNA profiling for risk stratification and matched treatment of central nervous system metastases","authors":"Mei-Mei Zheng, Qing Zhou, Hua-Jun Chen, Ben-Yuan Jiang, Li-Bo Tang, Guang-Ling Jie, Hai-Yan Tu, Kai Yin, Hao Sun, Si-Yang Liu, Jia-Tao Zhang, Fa-Man Xiao, Jin-Ji Yang, Xu-Chao Zhang, Wen-Zhao Zhong, Yi Pan, Bin-Chao Wang, Hong-Hong Yan, Wei-Bang Guo, Zhi-Hong Chen, Zhen Wang, Chong-Rui Xu, Su-Yun Li, Si-Yang Maggie Liu, Lu Zeng, Shang-Li Cai, Guo-Qiang Wang, Dong-Qin Zhu, Yang-Si Li, Yi-Long Wu","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03538-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genomic profiling of central nervous system (CNS) metastases has the potential to guide treatments. In the present study, we included 584 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and CNS metastases and performed a comprehensive analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) with clinicopathological annotation. CSF ctDNA-positive detection was independently associated with shorter survival than negative detection (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.56–2.39; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Matched tumor–CSF analysis characterized the CSF private molecular features causing poor survival (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.15–2.32, <i>P</i> = 0.006). A multimetric CSF ctDNA prognostic model integrating CSF ctDNA features and clinical factors was developed for risk-stratifying CNS metastases and validated in an independent cohort. Among patients with treatment histories available, those positive for a driver alteration by CSF ctDNA showed a survival benefit from CSF-matched therapy (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.65–0.92, <i>P</i> = 0.003). Longitudinal monitoring by CSF identified CNS-specific resistant mechanisms and a second matched targeted therapy indicating improved survival (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35–0.91, <i>P</i> = 0.018). These findings support the clinical value of CSF ctDNA for risk-stratifying CNS metastases and guiding therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03538-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Genomic profiling of central nervous system (CNS) metastases has the potential to guide treatments. In the present study, we included 584 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and CNS metastases and performed a comprehensive analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) with clinicopathological annotation. CSF ctDNA-positive detection was independently associated with shorter survival than negative detection (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.56–2.39; P < 0.0001). Matched tumor–CSF analysis characterized the CSF private molecular features causing poor survival (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.15–2.32, P = 0.006). A multimetric CSF ctDNA prognostic model integrating CSF ctDNA features and clinical factors was developed for risk-stratifying CNS metastases and validated in an independent cohort. Among patients with treatment histories available, those positive for a driver alteration by CSF ctDNA showed a survival benefit from CSF-matched therapy (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.65–0.92, P = 0.003). Longitudinal monitoring by CSF identified CNS-specific resistant mechanisms and a second matched targeted therapy indicating improved survival (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35–0.91, P = 0.018). These findings support the clinical value of CSF ctDNA for risk-stratifying CNS metastases and guiding therapy.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.