Robert J. Wellman , David R. Strong , Erin K. O'Loughlin , Marie-Pierre Sylvestre , Jennifer L. O’Loughlin
{"title":"Adapting and applying tobacco dependence indicators to cannabis dependence","authors":"Robert J. Wellman , David R. Strong , Erin K. O'Loughlin , Marie-Pierre Sylvestre , Jennifer L. O’Loughlin","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Dependence on addictive substances is indicated by impaired control, strong desires/craving, withdrawal symptoms with abstinence, challenges with quitting, etc. Most measures of dependence are substance-specific, which inhibits comparisons across substances. In light of increasing prevalence of cannabis and tobacco co-use, we aimed to adapt indicators of tobacco dependence to assess cannabis dependence (CD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 2024, past-year cannabis consumers (<em>n</em> = 320; <em>M</em>age = 35) from an ongoing 24-year longitudinal study completed self-report questionnaires. We examined the factor structure and measurement invariance across sex of the adapted 15-item scale, assessed the likelihood of endorsing and discriminative power of each item in participants with different degrees of CD, and explored the internal consistency, and construct and criterion-related validity of the scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Items loaded strongly on a single factor, and strict measurement invariance across sex was confirmed. Items demonstrated strong discriminative power among individuals with varying degrees of CD. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (ω<sub>cat</sub>=0.94), excellent convergent reliability (<em>r</em> = 0.76 with the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test), and a small though statistically significant inverse correlation with age at first use (<em>ρ</em>=−0.20). There was a dose-response relationship with frequency of cannabis use (<em>ρ</em>=0.81).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The adapted scale has excellent psychometric properties and is invariant across sex. Additional research is needed to determine whether these properties hold with larger and more diverse samples and across types of cannabis products (e.g., leaf, edibles, hashish). The scale may permit direct comparison of dependence across tobacco vs. cannabis consumers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"270 ","pages":"Article 112613"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625000663","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Dependence on addictive substances is indicated by impaired control, strong desires/craving, withdrawal symptoms with abstinence, challenges with quitting, etc. Most measures of dependence are substance-specific, which inhibits comparisons across substances. In light of increasing prevalence of cannabis and tobacco co-use, we aimed to adapt indicators of tobacco dependence to assess cannabis dependence (CD).
Methods
In 2024, past-year cannabis consumers (n = 320; Mage = 35) from an ongoing 24-year longitudinal study completed self-report questionnaires. We examined the factor structure and measurement invariance across sex of the adapted 15-item scale, assessed the likelihood of endorsing and discriminative power of each item in participants with different degrees of CD, and explored the internal consistency, and construct and criterion-related validity of the scale.
Results
Items loaded strongly on a single factor, and strict measurement invariance across sex was confirmed. Items demonstrated strong discriminative power among individuals with varying degrees of CD. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (ωcat=0.94), excellent convergent reliability (r = 0.76 with the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test), and a small though statistically significant inverse correlation with age at first use (ρ=−0.20). There was a dose-response relationship with frequency of cannabis use (ρ=0.81).
Conclusions
The adapted scale has excellent psychometric properties and is invariant across sex. Additional research is needed to determine whether these properties hold with larger and more diverse samples and across types of cannabis products (e.g., leaf, edibles, hashish). The scale may permit direct comparison of dependence across tobacco vs. cannabis consumers.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.