Digitalized opportunity space and managerial archetypes: An opportunity-centric perspective on digital innovation and transformation

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Organizational Dynamics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101075
Hong Hou, Hao Ma
{"title":"Digitalized opportunity space and managerial archetypes: An opportunity-centric perspective on digital innovation and transformation","authors":"Hong Hou,&nbsp;Hao Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As proliferating digital literature ignores how digital opportunities are generated in the first place, digital innovation<span> and transformation can be ontologically ungrounded. To fill this gap, following a realist perspective of entrepreneurship, this article examines digital opportunities as profit propensities afforded by a digitalized environment, while treating digital innovation and transformation as the actualization process. To elaborate, first, we coin Digitalized Opportunity Space (DOS) to describe the digitalized environment as a critical intersection of four spaces - resource, utility, digital, and institutional- that muster conditions without which digital opportunities cannot be actualized. Second, we develop four managerial archetypes - resource orchestrators, utility integrators, digital evangelists, and institutional realists- who tend to recognize digital opportunities based on their organizational location and thereby endorse different digital innovations. Third, to facilitate a systemic and balanced approach to digital transformation, we recommend group-level heuristics - the generic density perspective, the ecosystem view of the firm, multi-dimensional network effects, and disciplined imagination- which restore totality from partiality. Taken together, the DOS framework (of opportunity generation), the managerial archetypes (of opportunity recognition), and the group-level heuristics (of opportunity actualization) constitute the opportunity-centric (vs technology-centric or organization-centric) perspective on digital innovation and transformation, thereby materializing the connection between digital literature and entrepreneurship.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":48061,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Dynamics","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 101075"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As proliferating digital literature ignores how digital opportunities are generated in the first place, digital innovation and transformation can be ontologically ungrounded. To fill this gap, following a realist perspective of entrepreneurship, this article examines digital opportunities as profit propensities afforded by a digitalized environment, while treating digital innovation and transformation as the actualization process. To elaborate, first, we coin Digitalized Opportunity Space (DOS) to describe the digitalized environment as a critical intersection of four spaces - resource, utility, digital, and institutional- that muster conditions without which digital opportunities cannot be actualized. Second, we develop four managerial archetypes - resource orchestrators, utility integrators, digital evangelists, and institutional realists- who tend to recognize digital opportunities based on their organizational location and thereby endorse different digital innovations. Third, to facilitate a systemic and balanced approach to digital transformation, we recommend group-level heuristics - the generic density perspective, the ecosystem view of the firm, multi-dimensional network effects, and disciplined imagination- which restore totality from partiality. Taken together, the DOS framework (of opportunity generation), the managerial archetypes (of opportunity recognition), and the group-level heuristics (of opportunity actualization) constitute the opportunity-centric (vs technology-centric or organization-centric) perspective on digital innovation and transformation, thereby materializing the connection between digital literature and entrepreneurship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化机会空间与管理原型:以机会为中心的数字化创新与转型视角
由于激增的数字文献首先忽视了数字机会是如何产生的,数字创新和转型可能在本体论上没有根据。为了填补这一空白,本文遵循企业家精神的现实主义视角,将数字机会视为数字化环境提供的利润倾向,同时将数字创新和转型视为实现过程。首先,我们创造了数字化机会空间(DOS),将数字化环境描述为四个空间(资源、公用事业、数字和机构)的关键交叉点,没有这些空间,数字化机会就无法实现。其次,我们开发了四种管理原型——资源协调者、公用事业整合者、数字布道者和制度现实主义者——他们倾向于根据自己的组织位置识别数字机会,从而支持不同的数字创新。第三,为了促进系统和平衡的数字化转型方法,我们推荐群体层面的启发式方法——一般密度视角、企业生态系统视角、多维网络效应和有纪律的想象力——这些方法可以从偏见中恢复整体。总的来说,DOS框架(机会生成)、管理原型(机会识别)和群体层次的启发式(机会实现)构成了以机会为中心(相对于以技术为中心或以组织为中心)的数字创新和转型视角,从而实现了数字文学与企业家精神之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Organizational Dynamics domain is primarily organizational behavior and development and secondarily, HRM and strategic management. The objective is to link leading-edge thought and research with management practice. Organizational Dynamics publishes articles that embody both theoretical and practical content, showing how research findings can help deal more effectively with the dynamics of organizational life.
期刊最新文献
The architecture of impact: Defining what it takes to publish in organizational dynamics The digital voice to innovation matrix: How trust, digital employee voice, and sociability shape innovative job performance in hybrid workplaces Editorial Board The overlooked workforce: Harnessing the talent of people with criminal histories Mindfulness in organizations: Turning a trend into a trait
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1