Optimization of critical buckling load for variable stiffness composites using the lamination parameters as the field variables

IF 6.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES Composite Structures Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.118945
Eralp Demir , Ali Rashed
{"title":"Optimization of critical buckling load for variable stiffness composites using the lamination parameters as the field variables","authors":"Eralp Demir ,&nbsp;Ali Rashed","doi":"10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.118945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Buckling is a critical design concern for thin-walled structures and fiber-reinforced composite materials because it occurs with much lower strains than in failure. In this study, an in-house code is developed to optimize the critical buckling load using the lamination parameters as a design variable. The manufacturing steering curvature constraints are directly applied on the lamination parameters for the first time during optimization. The variable stiffness design revealed an approximately 160% improvement in the buckling load with respect to the optimal constant stiffness. The improvement in the critical buckling load ratio is over 400% with respect to the quasi-isotropic case, which is consistent with previous findings (Wu et al., 2015). The critical buckling load is 27% less when two opposite edges are clamped and two opposite edges are free compared to the ideal simply supported out-of-plane displacement boundary conditions that were used in previous optimization studies (Wu et al., 2015, Hao et al. 2019, Wu et al. 2012, Setoodeh et al. 2009, IJsselmuiden et al. 2010). The critical load ratio serves as the objective function when Neumann boundary conditions are employed, since membrane reactions remain unchanged throughout the optimization process, unlike in the case of Dirichlet boundary conditions. In addition, a widely accepted optimum fiber angle distribution, suggested in Gürdal et al. (2008), is implemented in a user-defined subroutine (UMAT) of Abaqus® to compare the buckling response of constant and variable stiffness of a plate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":281,"journal":{"name":"Composite Structures","volume":"359 ","pages":"Article 118945"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composite Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263822325001102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Buckling is a critical design concern for thin-walled structures and fiber-reinforced composite materials because it occurs with much lower strains than in failure. In this study, an in-house code is developed to optimize the critical buckling load using the lamination parameters as a design variable. The manufacturing steering curvature constraints are directly applied on the lamination parameters for the first time during optimization. The variable stiffness design revealed an approximately 160% improvement in the buckling load with respect to the optimal constant stiffness. The improvement in the critical buckling load ratio is over 400% with respect to the quasi-isotropic case, which is consistent with previous findings (Wu et al., 2015). The critical buckling load is 27% less when two opposite edges are clamped and two opposite edges are free compared to the ideal simply supported out-of-plane displacement boundary conditions that were used in previous optimization studies (Wu et al., 2015, Hao et al. 2019, Wu et al. 2012, Setoodeh et al. 2009, IJsselmuiden et al. 2010). The critical load ratio serves as the objective function when Neumann boundary conditions are employed, since membrane reactions remain unchanged throughout the optimization process, unlike in the case of Dirichlet boundary conditions. In addition, a widely accepted optimum fiber angle distribution, suggested in Gürdal et al. (2008), is implemented in a user-defined subroutine (UMAT) of Abaqus® to compare the buckling response of constant and variable stiffness of a plate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Composite Structures
Composite Structures 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
1246
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The past few decades have seen outstanding advances in the use of composite materials in structural applications. There can be little doubt that, within engineering circles, composites have revolutionised traditional design concepts and made possible an unparalleled range of new and exciting possibilities as viable materials for construction. Composite Structures, an International Journal, disseminates knowledge between users, manufacturers, designers and researchers involved in structures or structural components manufactured using composite materials. The journal publishes papers which contribute to knowledge in the use of composite materials in engineering structures. Papers deal with design, research and development studies, experimental investigations, theoretical analysis and fabrication techniques relevant to the application of composites in load-bearing components for assemblies, ranging from individual components such as plates and shells to complete composite structures.
期刊最新文献
Damage detection on flexural loading of hybrid laminated composite by acoustic emission A robust-optimal design of multimodal shunt circuit for subsonic flutter control and energy harvesting A critical verification of beam and shell models of wind turbine blades Identification and modeling of sandwich composite for possible structural reuse after over 20 years working as aerodynamic shell Robust multi-curve trimming IGA method for layerwise composite plates with arbitrary cutouts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1