Recent advancements in prospective life cycle assessment: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research

IF 12.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Resources Environment and Sustainability Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100203
Anissa Nurdiawati, Basit A. Mir, Sami G. Al-Ghamdi
{"title":"Recent advancements in prospective life cycle assessment: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research","authors":"Anissa Nurdiawati,&nbsp;Basit A. Mir,&nbsp;Sami G. Al-Ghamdi","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prospective Life Cycle Assessment (pLCA) is gaining interest due to its inherent future-oriented feature, which is an essential component of every decision-oriented life cycle assessment. Previous studies have highlighted challenges in conducting pLCA for emerging technologies, categorizing them into issues of comparability, data availability, scaling, and uncertainty and propose general frameworks to address these challenges. Accordingly, the application of pLCA is rapidly growing in recent years, with emerging methods addressing the limitations, and improving pLCA. This review study aims to compile and analyze emerging pLCA methods from scientific literature, identifying best practices and limitations to guide future research. It discusses methodological advancements in pLCA, including prospective life cycle inventory (pLCI) database, foreground modeling, scenario development and prospective life cycle impact assessment, offering insights for practitioners. While changes in background systems are increasingly addressed in pLCA studies, some, particularly earlier or less systematic ones, fall short of fully integrating nuanced future scenarios. The reviewed studies highlight that incorporating future scenarios related to the transformation of energy, material, transport, and industrial systems can significantly influence LCA outcomes, reinforcing the importance of explicitly integrating such scenarios into pLCA to ensure reliable and meaningful results. To ensure robust LCA studies, it is important to consider the use of pLCI databases, accounting for varying technology maturity levels, their improvement and diffusion rate, and incorporating spatial considerations. Yet, integrating pLCI databases with standard LCA tools remains complex, with a lack of practitioner guidance. Moreover, the interlinkage between climate change and various impact categories is a key source of uncertainty in future assessments, highlighting the need to improve both prospective inventory modeling and impact assessment. The findings call for future research to further explore the spatiotemporal effect of climate change on pLCA quantification, developing future-oriented characterization factors, expanding pLCI databases, as well as enhancing the applicability of pLCA studies through the integration of new analytical tools and models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100203"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916125000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prospective Life Cycle Assessment (pLCA) is gaining interest due to its inherent future-oriented feature, which is an essential component of every decision-oriented life cycle assessment. Previous studies have highlighted challenges in conducting pLCA for emerging technologies, categorizing them into issues of comparability, data availability, scaling, and uncertainty and propose general frameworks to address these challenges. Accordingly, the application of pLCA is rapidly growing in recent years, with emerging methods addressing the limitations, and improving pLCA. This review study aims to compile and analyze emerging pLCA methods from scientific literature, identifying best practices and limitations to guide future research. It discusses methodological advancements in pLCA, including prospective life cycle inventory (pLCI) database, foreground modeling, scenario development and prospective life cycle impact assessment, offering insights for practitioners. While changes in background systems are increasingly addressed in pLCA studies, some, particularly earlier or less systematic ones, fall short of fully integrating nuanced future scenarios. The reviewed studies highlight that incorporating future scenarios related to the transformation of energy, material, transport, and industrial systems can significantly influence LCA outcomes, reinforcing the importance of explicitly integrating such scenarios into pLCA to ensure reliable and meaningful results. To ensure robust LCA studies, it is important to consider the use of pLCI databases, accounting for varying technology maturity levels, their improvement and diffusion rate, and incorporating spatial considerations. Yet, integrating pLCI databases with standard LCA tools remains complex, with a lack of practitioner guidance. Moreover, the interlinkage between climate change and various impact categories is a key source of uncertainty in future assessments, highlighting the need to improve both prospective inventory modeling and impact assessment. The findings call for future research to further explore the spatiotemporal effect of climate change on pLCA quantification, developing future-oriented characterization factors, expanding pLCI databases, as well as enhancing the applicability of pLCA studies through the integration of new analytical tools and models.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the spatiotemporal dynamics and structural resilience of the global titanium industrial chain: Insights from trade network analysis Fighting the pollinators decline in practice – Farmers’ willingness to accept an eco-scheme for their conservation in Aragon, Spain Potential decarbonization for balancing local and non-local perishable food supply in megacities Microbial fermentation in co-ensiling forage-grain ratoon rice and maize to improve feed quality and enhance the sustainability of rice-based production systems Recent advancements in prospective life cycle assessment: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1