Volatility spillover dynamics between fintech and traditional financial industries and their rich determinants: New evidence from Chinese listed institutions

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104034
Chengcheng Liu , Meng Tian , Bai Huang
{"title":"Volatility spillover dynamics between fintech and traditional financial industries and their rich determinants: New evidence from Chinese listed institutions","authors":"Chengcheng Liu ,&nbsp;Meng Tian ,&nbsp;Bai Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the dynamics and determinants of volatility spillovers between Chinese financial technology (fintech) and traditional financial industries. We use stock prices of listed institutions and the elastic net vector autoregression (VAR) network approach to assess institution-, industry-, and system-level volatility spillovers in normal states between 2015 and 2023. Subsequently, we analyze 50 variables in terms of global environment, economic fundamentals, capital market, industry development, and other shocks and examine their impact on system- and industry-level volatility spillovers through variable selection and regression analysis. Furthermore, heterogeneous and asymmetric effects in extreme states are explored under a quantile-based framework. The empirical results show that (i) at the institutional level, volatility spillovers surge in the post-COVID-19 era, and large-cap institutions play vital roles in emitting volatility shocks. (ii) At the industry level, the fintech, securities, and diversified financial industries are net volatility transmitters, while the banking, insurance, and real estate industries are net receivers. Fundamental economic determinants prevail in explaining the net spillover index. (iii) At the system level, the total spillover index demonstrates a W-shape curve throughout the period. All determinants together explain over 85 % of the total spillover index. (iv) In extremely low and high volatility states, spillover effects are more obvious than in normal states. Industry development and capital market determinants fail to explain the respective total spillover indices. These findings offer valuable insights into how to foster effective risk management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 104034"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925001218","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamics and determinants of volatility spillovers between Chinese financial technology (fintech) and traditional financial industries. We use stock prices of listed institutions and the elastic net vector autoregression (VAR) network approach to assess institution-, industry-, and system-level volatility spillovers in normal states between 2015 and 2023. Subsequently, we analyze 50 variables in terms of global environment, economic fundamentals, capital market, industry development, and other shocks and examine their impact on system- and industry-level volatility spillovers through variable selection and regression analysis. Furthermore, heterogeneous and asymmetric effects in extreme states are explored under a quantile-based framework. The empirical results show that (i) at the institutional level, volatility spillovers surge in the post-COVID-19 era, and large-cap institutions play vital roles in emitting volatility shocks. (ii) At the industry level, the fintech, securities, and diversified financial industries are net volatility transmitters, while the banking, insurance, and real estate industries are net receivers. Fundamental economic determinants prevail in explaining the net spillover index. (iii) At the system level, the total spillover index demonstrates a W-shape curve throughout the period. All determinants together explain over 85 % of the total spillover index. (iv) In extremely low and high volatility states, spillover effects are more obvious than in normal states. Industry development and capital market determinants fail to explain the respective total spillover indices. These findings offer valuable insights into how to foster effective risk management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融科技与传统金融行业的波动溢出动态及其丰富决定因素:来自中国上市机构的新证据
本研究探讨了中国金融科技(fintech)与传统金融行业之间波动溢出的动态及其决定因素。我们使用上市机构的股票价格和弹性净向量自回归(VAR)网络方法来评估2015年至2023年正常状态下机构、行业和系统层面的波动溢出效应。随后,我们从全球环境、经济基本面、资本市场、行业发展和其他冲击等方面分析了50个变量,并通过变量选择和回归分析考察了它们对系统和行业层面波动溢出的影响。此外,在基于分位数的框架下,探讨了极端状态下的异质和不对称效应。实证结果表明:(1)在制度层面,后新冠肺炎时代波动性溢出效应激增,大盘股机构在释放波动性冲击方面发挥了至关重要的作用。(2)在行业层面,金融科技、证券、多元化金融行业是净波动发送者,银行、保险、房地产行业是净波动接收者。在解释净溢出指数时,基本经济决定因素占主导地位。(3)在制度层面,总溢出指数在整个时期呈w型曲线。所有决定因素加起来解释了85%以上的总溢出指数。(四)在极低和极高波动率状态下,溢出效应比正常状态下更为明显。产业发展和资本市场决定因素无法解释各自的总溢出指数。这些发现为如何促进有效的风险管理提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Are climate risk disclosures in earnings conference calls relevant to analysts? Mispricing and correction in short-term returns Threat or opportunity? Strategic deviance's effect on credit ratings Board gender diversity and strategic ESG balance: Evidence from U.S. public firms Does management's perception of climate transition risks promote or inhibit corporate green innovation?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1