Peyman Zandi , Mehdi Ajalli , Narges Soleiman Ekhtiyati
{"title":"An extended simple additive weighting decision support system with application in the food industry","authors":"Peyman Zandi , Mehdi Ajalli , Narges Soleiman Ekhtiyati","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to expand the application of the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique based on expanded information on the alternatives from sub-alternatives. For this purpose, some initial information is collected at the sub-alternative level. Then, based on the scores obtained for the sub-alternative level, the main alternatives are ranked using the simple additive weighting (SAW) method. The goal is to analyze decision alternatives and sub-alternatives, rank the alternatives according to criteria and sub-criteria, and analyze sensitivity based on their criteria and weights. A program is developed in MS Excel to dynamically explore a large amount of information. The results confirm the designed model’s ability to rank all alternatives and sub-alternatives. The model has been used to rank 220 products and 12 product portfolios in a food industry company. Five categories of decision criteria, including production, procurement, finance, product and sales, and competitors, were selected with 36 quantitative and qualitative sub-criteria. The results show that the market indicators and competitors directly impact the product portfolio’s priority. Some of the contributions of this research can be considered as a method for ranking alternatives based on the expanded information from sub-alternatives. As a management tool, the proposed model can be used in other fields and with different techniques to manage the portfolio of alternatives and sub-alternatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100553"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662225000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to expand the application of the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique based on expanded information on the alternatives from sub-alternatives. For this purpose, some initial information is collected at the sub-alternative level. Then, based on the scores obtained for the sub-alternative level, the main alternatives are ranked using the simple additive weighting (SAW) method. The goal is to analyze decision alternatives and sub-alternatives, rank the alternatives according to criteria and sub-criteria, and analyze sensitivity based on their criteria and weights. A program is developed in MS Excel to dynamically explore a large amount of information. The results confirm the designed model’s ability to rank all alternatives and sub-alternatives. The model has been used to rank 220 products and 12 product portfolios in a food industry company. Five categories of decision criteria, including production, procurement, finance, product and sales, and competitors, were selected with 36 quantitative and qualitative sub-criteria. The results show that the market indicators and competitors directly impact the product portfolio’s priority. Some of the contributions of this research can be considered as a method for ranking alternatives based on the expanded information from sub-alternatives. As a management tool, the proposed model can be used in other fields and with different techniques to manage the portfolio of alternatives and sub-alternatives.