Participation as a pathway to procedural justice: A review of energy initiatives across eight European countries

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103982
Sharayu Shejale , Mallory Xinyu Zhan , Marlyne Sahakian , Remina Aleksieva , Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu , Victoria Bogdanova , Barbara Cardone , Julia Epp , Benjamin Kirchler , Andrea Kollmann , Lucia Liste , Chiara Massullo , Karl-Ludwig Schibel
{"title":"Participation as a pathway to procedural justice: A review of energy initiatives across eight European countries","authors":"Sharayu Shejale ,&nbsp;Mallory Xinyu Zhan ,&nbsp;Marlyne Sahakian ,&nbsp;Remina Aleksieva ,&nbsp;Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu ,&nbsp;Victoria Bogdanova ,&nbsp;Barbara Cardone ,&nbsp;Julia Epp ,&nbsp;Benjamin Kirchler ,&nbsp;Andrea Kollmann ,&nbsp;Lucia Liste ,&nbsp;Chiara Massullo ,&nbsp;Karl-Ludwig Schibel","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The engagement of citizens in the energy transition through a variety of energy initiatives is an important component of a just energy transition. Through analyses of 378 energy initiatives, along with 81 interviews with energy professionals across eight European countries, including Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, Germany, Italy, Norway, Switzerland, and Türkiye, we examine how and in what ways these initiatives address justice outcomes. Specifically, we look at citizen participation as an avenue to procedural justice, which may enable forms or distributional and recognitional justice as well. We critically examine the different forms of citizen engagement put forward by such initiatives, classifying such initiatives into three types: i) demand side action, ii) supply side action and iii) political action. While all forms of engagement are instrumental, the latter two attach greater importance to collective actions and the political agency of individuals. For demand side actions, we find that people tend to be reduced to economic actors subject to top-down directives, given agency in the privacy of their homes through atomized, individual action. Supply side initiatives, like energy communities, may encourage increased citizen involvement, yet they may not fully reflect the ideals of collective political action. Direct participation in shaping energy policies is found to be an avenue towards procedural justice. Yet, it can also exclude female, non-white, lower-income populations unless processes are put into place for fairer representation. Finally, our analysis points to the potential of initiatives that move towards more political and collective actions to deliver energy justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103982"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The engagement of citizens in the energy transition through a variety of energy initiatives is an important component of a just energy transition. Through analyses of 378 energy initiatives, along with 81 interviews with energy professionals across eight European countries, including Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, Germany, Italy, Norway, Switzerland, and Türkiye, we examine how and in what ways these initiatives address justice outcomes. Specifically, we look at citizen participation as an avenue to procedural justice, which may enable forms or distributional and recognitional justice as well. We critically examine the different forms of citizen engagement put forward by such initiatives, classifying such initiatives into three types: i) demand side action, ii) supply side action and iii) political action. While all forms of engagement are instrumental, the latter two attach greater importance to collective actions and the political agency of individuals. For demand side actions, we find that people tend to be reduced to economic actors subject to top-down directives, given agency in the privacy of their homes through atomized, individual action. Supply side initiatives, like energy communities, may encourage increased citizen involvement, yet they may not fully reflect the ideals of collective political action. Direct participation in shaping energy policies is found to be an avenue towards procedural justice. Yet, it can also exclude female, non-white, lower-income populations unless processes are put into place for fairer representation. Finally, our analysis points to the potential of initiatives that move towards more political and collective actions to deliver energy justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与是实现程序正义的途径:对八个欧洲国家能源倡议的回顾
公民通过各种能源倡议参与能源转型是公正的能源转型的重要组成部分。通过对378项能源倡议的分析,以及对包括奥地利、保加利亚、希腊、德国、意大利、挪威、瑞士和土耳其在内的八个欧洲国家的81位能源专业人士的采访,我们研究了这些倡议如何以及以何种方式解决司法结果。具体而言,我们将公民参与视为实现程序正义的途径,这也可能使形式或分配和承认正义成为可能。我们批判性地研究了这些倡议所提出的不同形式的公民参与,将这些倡议分为三种类型:i)需求方行动,ii)供应方行动和iii)政治行动。虽然所有形式的参与都是有益的,但后两者更重视集体行动和个人的政治能动性。对于需求侧行动,我们发现人们倾向于沦为服从自上而下指令的经济行为者,通过原子化的个人行动,在他们家中的隐私中被赋予代理。供应方面的倡议,如能源社区,可能会鼓励更多的公民参与,但它们可能不能完全反映集体政治行动的理想。人们认为直接参与制定能源政策是实现程序公正的途径。然而,它也可能将女性、非白人、低收入人群排除在外,除非制定更公平的代表程序。最后,我们的分析指出,采取更多政治和集体行动来实现能源正义的举措具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Beyond yes and no: Clustering public perceptions of wave energy on the West Coast of the United States Reclaiming the wind: Indigenous windmills in Iran and their lessons for renewable energy From tension to transformation in Dutch heat transitions: Leveraging time, transparency, and relationships “Might give some hope for the future”: Understanding young adults' support for offshore wind in coastal Australia Solving the puzzle of justice: How to bridge the normative and descriptive logics in energy justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1