{"title":"Direction, drivers and design: The driving forces of sustainability policy creation at Canadian universities","authors":"Brandon Dickson","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2025.100096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Internationally, pushes for sustainability have come from a variety of actors, and universities have increasingly been seen as important sustainability actors due to their roles in research, education and their large resource consumption. Given this context, it is important to understand how universities shaped their sustainability direction. The aim of this research then was to explore the drivers that result in universities' sustainability direction. In order to do this, interviews were conducted with 16 university sustainability administrators from across Canada to determine the drivers of their sustainability strategy and direction. This research adopted a mixed methods coding procedure to analyse the interviews. Findings include that internal drivers including senior administrators and community members are the most significant drivers of sustainability priority development, and that government legislation has minimal impact on university sustainability priorities. Universities highlight that global governance mechanisms such as ratings are seen as both legitimate and useful, however high-level benchmarks and ranking organizations are often seen as communications tools rather than drivers. This research presents one of the earliest of its kind focused on the drivers of action on sustainability in higher education and shows how policy development takes a unique approach in universities compared with other sectors. These findings are significant to understand how universities are shaping their sustainability direction and to support policy makers and practitioners to guide university sustainability towards meaningful planning and prioritization. Conclusions include a need for future research into the implementation into such policies and a focus on the ‘next generation’ of sustainability priorities in new emerging policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791625000053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Internationally, pushes for sustainability have come from a variety of actors, and universities have increasingly been seen as important sustainability actors due to their roles in research, education and their large resource consumption. Given this context, it is important to understand how universities shaped their sustainability direction. The aim of this research then was to explore the drivers that result in universities' sustainability direction. In order to do this, interviews were conducted with 16 university sustainability administrators from across Canada to determine the drivers of their sustainability strategy and direction. This research adopted a mixed methods coding procedure to analyse the interviews. Findings include that internal drivers including senior administrators and community members are the most significant drivers of sustainability priority development, and that government legislation has minimal impact on university sustainability priorities. Universities highlight that global governance mechanisms such as ratings are seen as both legitimate and useful, however high-level benchmarks and ranking organizations are often seen as communications tools rather than drivers. This research presents one of the earliest of its kind focused on the drivers of action on sustainability in higher education and shows how policy development takes a unique approach in universities compared with other sectors. These findings are significant to understand how universities are shaping their sustainability direction and to support policy makers and practitioners to guide university sustainability towards meaningful planning and prioritization. Conclusions include a need for future research into the implementation into such policies and a focus on the ‘next generation’ of sustainability priorities in new emerging policies.