Different energy poverty issues, different engagement behaviors? An empirical analysis of citizen groups in Europe

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104003
Bianca Grozea-Bănică, Vera Miguéis, Lia Patrício
{"title":"Different energy poverty issues, different engagement behaviors? An empirical analysis of citizen groups in Europe","authors":"Bianca Grozea-Bănică,&nbsp;Vera Miguéis,&nbsp;Lia Patrício","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Engagement in the ongoing energy transition is particularly challenging for energy-poor citizens. As such, there is a pressing need for a better understanding of their experiences and for strategies that enable their engagement. In this study, we identify different groups of citizens based on their energy poverty issues and examine their engagement behaviors (seeking information, proactive managing, sharing feedback, helping others, and advocating). Using cluster analysis and multiple correspondence analysis, we analyzed a sample of 915 citizens from eight European cities participating in a Horizon2020 EU project (Alkmaar-NL, Bari-IT, Celje-SI, Évora-PT, Granada-ES, Hvidovre-DK, Ioannina-GR, Újpest-HU). Several groups of citizens reported either multiple energy issues, a single issue (energy bills, insulation, cooling, heating), or no issues, and the statistical tests showed significant differences across these groups in terms of engagement in seeking information, helping, and advocating. Moreover, we identified that certain groups tend to have specific levels of engagement (high, medium, low) and that sharing feedback generally has a low level of engagement. Overall, this study provides empirical insights into how energy-poor citizens exercise agency through engagement behaviors and offers actionable insights for designing measures to mitigate energy poverty in complementarity with technical and economical solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 104003"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engagement in the ongoing energy transition is particularly challenging for energy-poor citizens. As such, there is a pressing need for a better understanding of their experiences and for strategies that enable their engagement. In this study, we identify different groups of citizens based on their energy poverty issues and examine their engagement behaviors (seeking information, proactive managing, sharing feedback, helping others, and advocating). Using cluster analysis and multiple correspondence analysis, we analyzed a sample of 915 citizens from eight European cities participating in a Horizon2020 EU project (Alkmaar-NL, Bari-IT, Celje-SI, Évora-PT, Granada-ES, Hvidovre-DK, Ioannina-GR, Újpest-HU). Several groups of citizens reported either multiple energy issues, a single issue (energy bills, insulation, cooling, heating), or no issues, and the statistical tests showed significant differences across these groups in terms of engagement in seeking information, helping, and advocating. Moreover, we identified that certain groups tend to have specific levels of engagement (high, medium, low) and that sharing feedback generally has a low level of engagement. Overall, this study provides empirical insights into how energy-poor citizens exercise agency through engagement behaviors and offers actionable insights for designing measures to mitigate energy poverty in complementarity with technical and economical solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同的能源贫困问题,不同的参与行为?对欧洲公民团体的实证分析
对缺乏能源的公民来说,参与正在进行的能源转型尤其具有挑战性。因此,迫切需要更好地了解他们的经历,并制定使他们能够参与的战略。在本研究中,我们根据能源贫困问题确定了不同的公民群体,并检查了他们的参与行为(寻求信息、主动管理、分享反馈、帮助他人和倡导)。利用聚类分析和多重对应分析,我们分析了参与Horizon2020欧盟项目(Alkmaar-NL, Bari-IT, Celje-SI, Évora-PT, Granada-ES, Hvidovre-DK, Ioannina-GR, Újpest-HU)的八个欧洲城市的915名公民样本。几个公民群体报告了多个能源问题,一个问题(能源账单,绝缘,冷却,加热),或者没有问题,统计测试显示这些群体在寻求信息,帮助和倡导方面的参与有显著差异。此外,我们发现某些群体往往具有特定的粘性水平(高、中、低),而分享反馈通常具有较低的粘性水平。总体而言,本研究为能源贫困公民如何通过参与行为行使代理提供了实证见解,并为设计缓解能源贫困的措施提供了可操作的见解,并与技术和经济解决方案相辅相成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Private sector agency in low-carbon transitions: Rethinking energy security through hybrid governance in the Global South Infrastructure failures and aging populations: Quantifying the spatial overlap of power outages and older adult vulnerability The efficiency divide: Housing constraints on energy-saving practices in Darwin, Australia From anti-reflexive politicization to anti-reflexive policies: The emergence of renewable exclusion zones in United States environmental policy Towards a common intervention framework: A taxonomy of theory and techniques for digital energy behaviour change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1