A comprehensive step-by-step approach for the implementation of target trial emulation: Evaluating fluid resuscitation strategies in post-laparoscopic septic shock as an example

Jie Yang , Lihui Wang , Lin Chen , Pengmin Zhou , Suibi Yang , Hongjie Shen , Lifeng Xing , Pengpeng Chen , Yuetian Yu , Hongying Ni , Zhongheng Zhang
{"title":"A comprehensive step-by-step approach for the implementation of target trial emulation: Evaluating fluid resuscitation strategies in post-laparoscopic septic shock as an example","authors":"Jie Yang ,&nbsp;Lihui Wang ,&nbsp;Lin Chen ,&nbsp;Pengmin Zhou ,&nbsp;Suibi Yang ,&nbsp;Hongjie Shen ,&nbsp;Lifeng Xing ,&nbsp;Pengpeng Chen ,&nbsp;Yuetian Yu ,&nbsp;Hongying Ni ,&nbsp;Zhongheng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and demonstrate a comprehensive methodological framework for target trial emulation (TTE) implementation via post-laparoscopic septic shock fluid management as a clinical case study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We designed a simulated study of 10,000 patients in which colloid resuscitation was compared with crystalloid resuscitation. The framework incorporated precise eligibility criteria, standardized intervention protocols, and balanced treatment allocation with temporal anchoring. The primary analyses focused on 28-day mortality and were evaluated through survival analysis and comparative statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The methodological framework successfully demonstrated the systematic implementation of TTE principles, providing reproducible protocols for eligibility determination, intervention standardization, and outcome assessment in observational studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This work bridges the gap between TTE theory and practice by providing a detailed technical roadmap that enhances methodological transparency and reproducibility in comparative effectiveness research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 28-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900925000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop and demonstrate a comprehensive methodological framework for target trial emulation (TTE) implementation via post-laparoscopic septic shock fluid management as a clinical case study.

Methods

We designed a simulated study of 10,000 patients in which colloid resuscitation was compared with crystalloid resuscitation. The framework incorporated precise eligibility criteria, standardized intervention protocols, and balanced treatment allocation with temporal anchoring. The primary analyses focused on 28-day mortality and were evaluated through survival analysis and comparative statistics.

Results

The methodological framework successfully demonstrated the systematic implementation of TTE principles, providing reproducible protocols for eligibility determination, intervention standardization, and outcome assessment in observational studies.

Conclusion

This work bridges the gap between TTE theory and practice by providing a detailed technical roadmap that enhances methodological transparency and reproducibility in comparative effectiveness research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逐步实施目标试验模拟的综合方法:以腹腔镜术后脓毒性休克的液体复苏策略评估为例
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
期刊最新文献
Recent patterns in minimally invasive colectomies: Where are we now? The outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease post bariatric surgery: A systemic review and meta-analysis Fully endoscopic microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective study A comprehensive step-by-step approach for the implementation of target trial emulation: Evaluating fluid resuscitation strategies in post-laparoscopic septic shock as an example From runways to robots: A renaissance of the analogy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1