Reporting practices in applied linguistics quantitative research articles across a decade: A methodological synthesis

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH System Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.system.2025.103627
Fahimeh Marefat , Mohammad Hassanzadeh , Sina Noureddini , Mostafa Ranjbar
{"title":"Reporting practices in applied linguistics quantitative research articles across a decade: A methodological synthesis","authors":"Fahimeh Marefat ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hassanzadeh ,&nbsp;Sina Noureddini ,&nbsp;Mostafa Ranjbar","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The standards for quantitative second language (L2) research paradigm are becoming increasingly stringent. Meanwhile, the purpose of methodological synthesis is to describe, examine, and appraise field-wide practices to augment the quality of future research. The current study strove to follow this line of inquiry by examining study quality and reporting practices in 382 experimental research articles (RAs) from seven international journals with an eye to any evolving pattern over time. In so doing, an integrated-moderated coding scheme was created. Then, the frequency counts and all related practices for the period between 2011 and 2021 were documented. The overall analysis revealed substantial adherence to methodological quality standards, including the reporting of sample size, pretesting, as well as descriptive and inferential statistics. Nevertheless, issues such as inadequate integration of probability sampling, delayed posttesting, advanced statistical techniques, and data-accountable graphs were evident as well, albeit slightly improving over time. Findings are expected to enhance the methodological awareness of L2 researchers as well as those who aspire to adopt a holistic and collaborative approach to methodological syntheses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 103627"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25000375","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The standards for quantitative second language (L2) research paradigm are becoming increasingly stringent. Meanwhile, the purpose of methodological synthesis is to describe, examine, and appraise field-wide practices to augment the quality of future research. The current study strove to follow this line of inquiry by examining study quality and reporting practices in 382 experimental research articles (RAs) from seven international journals with an eye to any evolving pattern over time. In so doing, an integrated-moderated coding scheme was created. Then, the frequency counts and all related practices for the period between 2011 and 2021 were documented. The overall analysis revealed substantial adherence to methodological quality standards, including the reporting of sample size, pretesting, as well as descriptive and inferential statistics. Nevertheless, issues such as inadequate integration of probability sampling, delayed posttesting, advanced statistical techniques, and data-accountable graphs were evident as well, albeit slightly improving over time. Findings are expected to enhance the methodological awareness of L2 researchers as well as those who aspire to adopt a holistic and collaborative approach to methodological syntheses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Reporting practices in applied linguistics quantitative research articles across a decade: A methodological synthesis Conceptualising the actual L2 self into the L2 motivational self system “I am feeling alive again”: Transformative learning between two female transnational scholars of color through duoethnography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1