Effects of a theory-driven hybrid online-offline mentorship program on transition outcomes of newly graduated nurses in their first year: A randomized controlled trial

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104317
Yaqi Zhu , Yuanyuan Zhang , Jie Wu , Xiaohua Ge , Yaqing Zhang
{"title":"Effects of a theory-driven hybrid online-offline mentorship program on transition outcomes of newly graduated nurses in their first year: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Yaqi Zhu ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jie Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaohua Ge ,&nbsp;Yaqing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to measure the feasibility and acceptability of a theory-driven hybrid online-offline mentorship program and determine its impact on transition of newly graduated nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Excessive transition shock for newly graduated nurses can harm their well-being and increase nursing mistakes and patient issues. Therefore, helping newly graduated nurses in transitioning is crucial.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A parallel 2-arm randomized controlled trial design was used.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The study randomly assigned 90 newly graduated nurses to receive either mentorship intervention or usual training. Two of them lost at the first follow-up and their data were not included in the outcome analysis. Outcomes included transition shock, job satisfaction and intent to stay. Generalized Linear Mixed Model was conducted to compare outcomes at baseline to follow-up. Semi-interviews with mentees and mentors were conducted for the qualitative part. Thematic analysis was used to code the qualitative responses. This report adheres to the CONSORT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 6 months post-intervention, participants in the intervention group showed significant mitigation of rising levels of transition shock (Coef.=-0.223, p &lt; 0.001) compared with the control group. Moreover, participants showed significant mitigation of declining of job satisfaction (Coef.=0.075, p &lt; 0.05) and intent to stay (Coef.=0.435, p &lt; 0.01). Qualitative findings showed participants’ positive experience with the program.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study showed that the intervention not only effectively mitigated the transition shock for newly graduated nurses but also slowed the decline in job satisfaction and intent to stay, offering valuable insights for future nursing research, education and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595325000733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to measure the feasibility and acceptability of a theory-driven hybrid online-offline mentorship program and determine its impact on transition of newly graduated nurses.

Background

Excessive transition shock for newly graduated nurses can harm their well-being and increase nursing mistakes and patient issues. Therefore, helping newly graduated nurses in transitioning is crucial.

Design

A parallel 2-arm randomized controlled trial design was used.

Method

The study randomly assigned 90 newly graduated nurses to receive either mentorship intervention or usual training. Two of them lost at the first follow-up and their data were not included in the outcome analysis. Outcomes included transition shock, job satisfaction and intent to stay. Generalized Linear Mixed Model was conducted to compare outcomes at baseline to follow-up. Semi-interviews with mentees and mentors were conducted for the qualitative part. Thematic analysis was used to code the qualitative responses. This report adheres to the CONSORT.

Results

At 6 months post-intervention, participants in the intervention group showed significant mitigation of rising levels of transition shock (Coef.=-0.223, p < 0.001) compared with the control group. Moreover, participants showed significant mitigation of declining of job satisfaction (Coef.=0.075, p < 0.05) and intent to stay (Coef.=0.435, p < 0.01). Qualitative findings showed participants’ positive experience with the program.

Conclusion

The study showed that the intervention not only effectively mitigated the transition shock for newly graduated nurses but also slowed the decline in job satisfaction and intent to stay, offering valuable insights for future nursing research, education and management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Students’ perspectives on the congruence and effectiveness of a problem-based learning approach to teach recovery-oriented practice: A mixed method study Application of the Rosenthal effect combined with the CDIO teaching model to enhance core competencies in nursing interns Reimagining relationality as the focus of midwifery education: A qualitative study Effects of a theory-driven hybrid online-offline mentorship program on transition outcomes of newly graduated nurses in their first year: A randomized controlled trial Interventions to develop clinical judgment among nurses: A systematic review with narrative synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1