Assessing the feasibility of Ammonia utilization for Power generation: A techno-economic-environmental study

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Energy Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125581
Iskandar Halim , Nur Sara Zain , Hsien H. Khoo
{"title":"Assessing the feasibility of Ammonia utilization for Power generation: A techno-economic-environmental study","authors":"Iskandar Halim ,&nbsp;Nur Sara Zain ,&nbsp;Hsien H. Khoo","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the techno-economic and environmental implications of utilizing green and blue ammonia for Singapore's future power plants. Two approaches are considered: cracking ammonia to produce hydrogen for power generation and directly using ammonia as a fuel. The analysis begins with a conceptual design of an ammonia cracking plant, followed by an economic assessment comparing the levelized costs of ammonia-to‑hydrogen conversion with those of direct ammonia utilization. Finally, the study evaluates greenhouse gas emissions and carbon abatement costs for each approach.</div><div>Our study reveals several noteworthy insights. Economically, direct ammonia utilization as a fuel for power plants is preferable to hydrogen production through ammonia cracking due to the high capital and operational costs associated with the cracking process. Environmentally, green ammonia—whether used directly or cracked into hydrogen—demonstrates an almost zero-emission profile. However, caution is warranted for ammonia derived from coal gasification, as its cracking could yield emissions higher than Singapore's current grid levels. Regarding carbon abatement costs, direct use of green ammonia emerges as the most cost-effective option. Additionally, blue ammonia from steam methane reforming serves as a practical transitional solution, supporting the shift to sustainable green ammonia as costs decrease and the necessary infrastructure is further developed in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"386 ","pages":"Article 125581"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925003113","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the techno-economic and environmental implications of utilizing green and blue ammonia for Singapore's future power plants. Two approaches are considered: cracking ammonia to produce hydrogen for power generation and directly using ammonia as a fuel. The analysis begins with a conceptual design of an ammonia cracking plant, followed by an economic assessment comparing the levelized costs of ammonia-to‑hydrogen conversion with those of direct ammonia utilization. Finally, the study evaluates greenhouse gas emissions and carbon abatement costs for each approach.
Our study reveals several noteworthy insights. Economically, direct ammonia utilization as a fuel for power plants is preferable to hydrogen production through ammonia cracking due to the high capital and operational costs associated with the cracking process. Environmentally, green ammonia—whether used directly or cracked into hydrogen—demonstrates an almost zero-emission profile. However, caution is warranted for ammonia derived from coal gasification, as its cracking could yield emissions higher than Singapore's current grid levels. Regarding carbon abatement costs, direct use of green ammonia emerges as the most cost-effective option. Additionally, blue ammonia from steam methane reforming serves as a practical transitional solution, supporting the shift to sustainable green ammonia as costs decrease and the necessary infrastructure is further developed in the future.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价氨发电的可行性:技术经济环境研究
本研究探讨了新加坡未来发电厂使用绿氨和蓝氨的技术经济和环境影响。考虑了两种方法:裂解氨产生用于发电的氢和直接使用氨作为燃料。分析从氨裂化装置的概念设计开始,然后进行经济评估,比较氨制氢和直接利用氨的平准化成本。最后,研究评估了每种方法的温室气体排放和碳减排成本。我们的研究揭示了几个值得注意的见解。从经济上讲,直接利用氨作为发电厂的燃料比通过氨裂解制氢更可取,因为与裂解过程相关的高资本和运营成本。在环境方面,绿色氨——无论是直接使用还是裂解成氢——几乎是零排放的。然而,对煤气化产生的氨需要谨慎,因为其裂解产生的排放量可能高于新加坡目前的电网水平。就碳减排成本而言,直接使用绿色氨是最具成本效益的选择。此外,蒸汽甲烷重整产生的蓝氨作为一种实用的过渡解决方案,随着成本的降低和未来必要的基础设施的进一步发展,支持向可持续绿色氨的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
期刊最新文献
Integrating bidding data into electricity price forecasting: An interpretable graph representation modeling approach Superheated steam generation with open hybrid absorption-compression heat pump cycle Intensification of wind energy droughts and enhanced spatial co-occurrence across China under future climate scenarios The role of deep closed-loop advanced geothermal systems in the future net-zero Swiss power system Regional adaptive hydropower-pumped storage collaborative planning for low-carbon transition: Flexibility enhancement and benefit evaluation based on resource endowment differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1