Deconstructing fertilizer price spikes: Evidence from Chinese urea fertilizer market

IF 6.8 1区经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102829

Zhepeng Hu , Lei Yan , Jinghong Yuan , Xiaoli Etienne

{"title":"Deconstructing fertilizer price spikes: Evidence from Chinese urea fertilizer market","authors":"Zhepeng Hu , Lei Yan , Jinghong Yuan , Xiaoli Etienne","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent fertilizer price spikes in 2021–2022, coupled with government interventions by major exporting countries, have raised global concerns about food security. This study investigates the key drivers of urea prices in China—the world’s largest producer and a major exporter. First, we analyze price transmission between China’s domestic spot and export urea markets, finding no cointegration even prior to the export restrictions introduced in October 2021. Next, we employ a structural vector autoregression model to examine domestic urea price spikes, using a heteroskedasticity-based identification strategy that allows for smoothly transitioning covariances. We decompose urea prices into four structural shocks: supply shocks driven by energy price changes, demand shocks linked to crop price fluctuations, export demand shocks, and market-specific idiosyncratic shocks unrelated to the first three. The findings reveal that rising energy costs and idiosyncratic factors were the main drivers of urea prices in China from 2018 to 2023, while shocks to corn prices and export demand had a smaller impact. Overall, the results indicate that recent export restrictions have had limited influence on domestic urea prices, calling into question the effectiveness of China’s October 2021 export restrictions as a price stabilization measure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 102829"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000338","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent fertilizer price spikes in 2021–2022, coupled with government interventions by major exporting countries, have raised global concerns about food security. This study investigates the key drivers of urea prices in China—the world’s largest producer and a major exporter. First, we analyze price transmission between China’s domestic spot and export urea markets, finding no cointegration even prior to the export restrictions introduced in October 2021. Next, we employ a structural vector autoregression model to examine domestic urea price spikes, using a heteroskedasticity-based identification strategy that allows for smoothly transitioning covariances. We decompose urea prices into four structural shocks: supply shocks driven by energy price changes, demand shocks linked to crop price fluctuations, export demand shocks, and market-specific idiosyncratic shocks unrelated to the first three. The findings reveal that rising energy costs and idiosyncratic factors were the main drivers of urea prices in China from 2018 to 2023, while shocks to corn prices and export demand had a smaller impact. Overall, the results indicate that recent export restrictions have had limited influence on domestic urea prices, calling into question the effectiveness of China’s October 2021 export restrictions as a price stabilization measure.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策

CiteScore

11.40

自引率

4.60%

发文量

128

审稿时长

62 days

期刊介绍： Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.