What do the guidelines say about use of biosimilar insulin therapy? Simple practical considerations to guide clinicians in different patient subgroups—Sharing Canadian perspectives

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1111/dom.16278
A. Abitbol MDCM, L. Chu PhD
{"title":"What do the guidelines say about use of biosimilar insulin therapy? Simple practical considerations to guide clinicians in different patient subgroups—Sharing Canadian perspectives","authors":"A. Abitbol MDCM,&nbsp;L. Chu PhD","doi":"10.1111/dom.16278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The rising cost of insulins are significantly impacting health care expenditure, thereby limiting access to treatment for more people affected by diabetes. Fear and misunderstanding of insulin therapy have worsened with the emergence of biosimilar insulins. Biosimilars are not the same as generic medications. Generic medication contains identical ingredients to the reference, whereas biosimilar medication is highly comparable but not necessarily identical to the reference.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There are five biosimilar insulins currently available in Canada: insulin glargine (U-100) as the biosimilar insulins, Basaglar® and Semglee®, insulin lispro (U-100) as the biosimilar insulin, Admelog® and insulin aspart (U-100) as the biosimilar insulins, Trurapi® and Kirsty ™. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety and immunogenicity for biosimilar insulins compared with reference insulins. The dosing of biosimilar insulins is also the same as the reference for initiating, switching (1:1) and titrating. Regulatory agencies, payors and clinical practice guideline committees are initiating biosimilar initiatives aimed at reducing costs, impacting more patients worldwide. While few studies have evaluated biosimilar insulin use in a real-world clinical practice setting, the descriptive patterns retrieved from the LMC Diabetes Registry reflect the Ontario Ministry of Health's changes in biologic drug policy that were implemented to promote the use of biosimilar insulins.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Many health care providers are largely unfamiliar with biosimilar insulins. This limits the acceptance of biosimilar insulins by patients, as it is related to the comfort of health care providers in educating patients. Tailoring effective conversations to patient needs ensures the best possible therapeutic outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This review article intends to review the efficacy and safety data from pivotal clinical trials with biosimilar insulins, as well as the regulatory and health economic considerations which underpin the safe and cost-effective use of biosimilar insulin therapy. Biosimilars are not the same as generic medications. Generic medication contains identical ingredients to the reference, whereas biosimilar medication is highly comparable but not necessarily identical to the reference. There are five biosimilar insulins currently available in Canada: insulin glargine (U-100) as the biosimilar insulins, Basaglar® and Semglee®, insulin lispro (U-100) as the biosimilar insulin, Admelog® and insulin aspart (U-100) as the biosimilar insulins, Trurapi® and Kirsty™. Data for biosimilars must be submitted in a stepwise approach to demonstrate similarity to the reference biologic under the following categories: structure &amp; function, human clinical trials, comparative studies evaluating efficacy and safety and manufacturing quality control. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety and immunogenicity for biosimilar insulins compared with reference insulins. The dosing of biosimilar insulins is also the same as the reference for initiating, switching (1:1) and titrating. Health care providers are encouraged to stay up to date on the latest guidelines and recommendations regarding biosimilar insulin interchangeability to ensure safe and cost-effective use of these products. Regulatory agencies, payors and clinical practice guideline committees are initiating biosimilar initiatives aimed at reducing costs, impacting more patients worldwide. While few studies have evaluated biosimilar insulin use in a real-world clinical practice setting, the descriptive patterns retrieved from the LMC Diabetes Registry reflect the Ontario Ministry of Health's changes in biologic drug policy that were implemented to promote the use of biosimilar insulins. A summary of adults with diabetes from this registry showed 3.8% of individuals with T1D were prescribed Basaglar® before April 2023 compared to 12.0% after January 2024. For the T2D cohort, the use of basal biosimilar insulins, Basaglar® and Semglee®, similarly increased by approximately 10% and 2% after January 2024, respectively. The use of bolus biosimilar insulins also increased after January 2024 by approximately 28% in the T1D cohort and 60% in the T2D cohort using insulin therapy. Many health care providers are largely unfamiliar with biosimilar insulins. This limits the acceptance of biosimilar insulins by patients, as it is related to the comfort of health care providers in educating patients. People living with diabetes must have access to safe and effective treatment options, and they should be able to obtain appropriate medications at an affordable price and in a fair and timely manner.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":"27 S5","pages":"36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dom.16278","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://dom-pubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The rising cost of insulins are significantly impacting health care expenditure, thereby limiting access to treatment for more people affected by diabetes. Fear and misunderstanding of insulin therapy have worsened with the emergence of biosimilar insulins. Biosimilars are not the same as generic medications. Generic medication contains identical ingredients to the reference, whereas biosimilar medication is highly comparable but not necessarily identical to the reference.

Results

There are five biosimilar insulins currently available in Canada: insulin glargine (U-100) as the biosimilar insulins, Basaglar® and Semglee®, insulin lispro (U-100) as the biosimilar insulin, Admelog® and insulin aspart (U-100) as the biosimilar insulins, Trurapi® and Kirsty ™. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety and immunogenicity for biosimilar insulins compared with reference insulins. The dosing of biosimilar insulins is also the same as the reference for initiating, switching (1:1) and titrating. Regulatory agencies, payors and clinical practice guideline committees are initiating biosimilar initiatives aimed at reducing costs, impacting more patients worldwide. While few studies have evaluated biosimilar insulin use in a real-world clinical practice setting, the descriptive patterns retrieved from the LMC Diabetes Registry reflect the Ontario Ministry of Health's changes in biologic drug policy that were implemented to promote the use of biosimilar insulins.

Conclusion

Many health care providers are largely unfamiliar with biosimilar insulins. This limits the acceptance of biosimilar insulins by patients, as it is related to the comfort of health care providers in educating patients. Tailoring effective conversations to patient needs ensures the best possible therapeutic outcomes.

Plain Language Summary

This review article intends to review the efficacy and safety data from pivotal clinical trials with biosimilar insulins, as well as the regulatory and health economic considerations which underpin the safe and cost-effective use of biosimilar insulin therapy. Biosimilars are not the same as generic medications. Generic medication contains identical ingredients to the reference, whereas biosimilar medication is highly comparable but not necessarily identical to the reference. There are five biosimilar insulins currently available in Canada: insulin glargine (U-100) as the biosimilar insulins, Basaglar® and Semglee®, insulin lispro (U-100) as the biosimilar insulin, Admelog® and insulin aspart (U-100) as the biosimilar insulins, Trurapi® and Kirsty™. Data for biosimilars must be submitted in a stepwise approach to demonstrate similarity to the reference biologic under the following categories: structure & function, human clinical trials, comparative studies evaluating efficacy and safety and manufacturing quality control. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety and immunogenicity for biosimilar insulins compared with reference insulins. The dosing of biosimilar insulins is also the same as the reference for initiating, switching (1:1) and titrating. Health care providers are encouraged to stay up to date on the latest guidelines and recommendations regarding biosimilar insulin interchangeability to ensure safe and cost-effective use of these products. Regulatory agencies, payors and clinical practice guideline committees are initiating biosimilar initiatives aimed at reducing costs, impacting more patients worldwide. While few studies have evaluated biosimilar insulin use in a real-world clinical practice setting, the descriptive patterns retrieved from the LMC Diabetes Registry reflect the Ontario Ministry of Health's changes in biologic drug policy that were implemented to promote the use of biosimilar insulins. A summary of adults with diabetes from this registry showed 3.8% of individuals with T1D were prescribed Basaglar® before April 2023 compared to 12.0% after January 2024. For the T2D cohort, the use of basal biosimilar insulins, Basaglar® and Semglee®, similarly increased by approximately 10% and 2% after January 2024, respectively. The use of bolus biosimilar insulins also increased after January 2024 by approximately 28% in the T1D cohort and 60% in the T2D cohort using insulin therapy. Many health care providers are largely unfamiliar with biosimilar insulins. This limits the acceptance of biosimilar insulins by patients, as it is related to the comfort of health care providers in educating patients. People living with diabetes must have access to safe and effective treatment options, and they should be able to obtain appropriate medications at an affordable price and in a fair and timely manner.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指南对使用生物类似胰岛素疗法有什么规定?简单的实际考虑,以指导临床医生在不同的病人亚组-分享加拿大的观点。
背景:胰岛素成本的上升严重影响了卫生保健支出,从而限制了更多糖尿病患者获得治疗的机会。对胰岛素治疗的恐惧和误解随着生物类似胰岛素的出现而加剧。生物仿制药与非专利药不同。仿制药含有与参考药物相同的成分,而生物仿制药具有高度可比性,但不一定与参考药物相同。结果:加拿大目前有5种生物类似药:甘精胰岛素(U-100)作为生物类似药,Basaglar®和Semglee®,胰岛素lispro (U-100)作为生物类似药,Admelog®和胰岛素aspart (U-100)作为生物类似药,Trurapi®和Kirsty™。最近的临床试验表明,与参考胰岛素相比,生物仿制胰岛素的疗效、安全性和免疫原性相当。生物仿制胰岛素的剂量也与起始、切换(1:1)和滴定的参考相同。监管机构、支付方和临床实践指南委员会正在启动旨在降低成本的生物仿制药举措,从而影响全球更多的患者。虽然很少有研究在现实世界的临床实践环境中评估生物类似药胰岛素的使用,但从LMC糖尿病登记处检索到的描述模式反映了安大略省卫生部为促进生物类似药胰岛素的使用而实施的生物药物政策的变化。结论:许多卫生保健提供者在很大程度上不熟悉生物类似物胰岛素。这限制了患者对生物仿制胰岛素的接受,因为这与卫生保健提供者在教育患者方面的舒适度有关。根据病人的需要量身定制有效的对话,可以确保最佳的治疗效果。摘要:这篇综述文章旨在回顾生物类似药胰岛素关键临床试验的有效性和安全性数据,以及支持生物类似药胰岛素治疗安全性和成本效益的监管和健康经济考虑。生物仿制药与非专利药不同。仿制药含有与参考药物相同的成分,而生物仿制药具有高度可比性,但不一定与参考药物相同。目前在加拿大有5种生物类似胰岛素:甘精胰岛素(U-100)作为生物类似胰岛素,Basaglar®和Semglee®,胰岛素lispro (U-100)作为生物类似胰岛素,Admelog®和胰岛素aspart (U-100)作为生物类似胰岛素,Trurapi®和Kirsty™。生物仿制药的数据必须以循序渐进的方式提交,以证明与参考生物制剂在以下类别下的相似性:结构和功能,人体临床试验,评估疗效和安全性的比较研究以及生产质量控制。最近的临床试验表明,与参考胰岛素相比,生物仿制胰岛素的疗效、安全性和免疫原性相当。生物仿制胰岛素的剂量也与起始、切换(1:1)和滴定的参考相同。鼓励卫生保健提供者及时了解有关生物类似药胰岛素互换性的最新指南和建议,以确保这些产品的安全和具有成本效益的使用。监管机构、支付方和临床实践指南委员会正在启动旨在降低成本的生物仿制药举措,从而影响全球更多的患者。虽然很少有研究在现实世界的临床实践环境中评估生物类似药胰岛素的使用,但从LMC糖尿病登记处检索到的描述模式反映了安大略省卫生部为促进生物类似药胰岛素的使用而实施的生物药物政策的变化。来自该登记处的成人糖尿病患者总结显示,2023年4月之前,3.8%的T1D患者服用了Basaglar®,而2024年1月之后,这一比例为12.0%。对于T2D队列,基础生物类似胰岛素Basaglar®和Semglee®的使用在2024年1月后分别增加了约10%和2%。2024年1月以后,使用胰岛素治疗的T1D组和T2D组的生物类似药胰岛素使用量也分别增加了约28%和60%。许多医疗保健提供者在很大程度上不熟悉生物仿制胰岛素。这限制了患者对生物仿制胰岛素的接受,因为这与卫生保健提供者在教育患者方面的舒适度有关。糖尿病患者必须能够获得安全有效的治疗选择,他们应该能够以可承受的价格公平和及时地获得适当的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
期刊最新文献
Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cognitive function in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. The importance of treatment sequencing with SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists combination for kidney function preservation in type 2 diabetes. Dual action of imeglimin on insulin secretion and sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. Comparison of DXA, BIA, and anthropometry for assessing subcutaneous, visceral, liver, and pancreas fat measured by MRI. Elevated triglyceride-glucose index is associated with increased risk of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in type 1 diabetes: Nationwide cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1