Predictive value of qSOFA score for mortality in older patients with dengue fever: a retrospective case-control study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1186/s12877-025-05711-4
Chi-Heng Lee, Yu-Chieh Ho, Chien-Chin Hsu, Hung-Jung Lin, Jui-Yuan Chung, Chien-Cheng Huang
{"title":"Predictive value of qSOFA score for mortality in older patients with dengue fever: a retrospective case-control study.","authors":"Chi-Heng Lee, Yu-Chieh Ho, Chien-Chin Hsu, Hung-Jung Lin, Jui-Yuan Chung, Chien-Cheng Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05711-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dengue fever (DF) in older patients is associated with higher mortality, but optimal mortality prediction approaches remain unclear. We assessed the utility of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) as a predictive tool in older DF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included DF patients aged ≥ 65 years who visited our study hospital between September 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015. Demographics, vital signs, comorbidities, laboratory data, and mortality were collected. Accuracy of qSOFA score ≥ 2 in predicting 30-day mortality was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>626 older DF patients were recruited (mean age: 74.1 years, nearly equal sex distribution). Mean ± standard deviation of qSOFA score was higher in mortality group vs. survival group (0.6 ± 0.8 vs. 0.1 ± 0, p < 0.01). Logistic regression showed qSOFA score ≥ 2 associated with higher mortality risk (odds ratio: 18.74; 95% confidence interval: 4.37 - 50.64). Adjusted area under receiver operating characteristic was 0.75, and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was 0.58. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of qSOFA score ≥ 2 for predicting mortality were 18.5%, 98.7%, 38.5%, and 96.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>qSOFA score ≥ 2 is a simple and specific tool for predicting 30-day mortality in older patients with DF, with high specificity and negative predictive value. It can be used to rule out patients at high risk of mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05711-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dengue fever (DF) in older patients is associated with higher mortality, but optimal mortality prediction approaches remain unclear. We assessed the utility of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) as a predictive tool in older DF patients.

Methods: We retrospectively included DF patients aged ≥ 65 years who visited our study hospital between September 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015. Demographics, vital signs, comorbidities, laboratory data, and mortality were collected. Accuracy of qSOFA score ≥ 2 in predicting 30-day mortality was evaluated.

Results: 626 older DF patients were recruited (mean age: 74.1 years, nearly equal sex distribution). Mean ± standard deviation of qSOFA score was higher in mortality group vs. survival group (0.6 ± 0.8 vs. 0.1 ± 0, p < 0.01). Logistic regression showed qSOFA score ≥ 2 associated with higher mortality risk (odds ratio: 18.74; 95% confidence interval: 4.37 - 50.64). Adjusted area under receiver operating characteristic was 0.75, and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was 0.58. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of qSOFA score ≥ 2 for predicting mortality were 18.5%, 98.7%, 38.5%, and 96.4%, respectively.

Conclusion: qSOFA score ≥ 2 is a simple and specific tool for predicting 30-day mortality in older patients with DF, with high specificity and negative predictive value. It can be used to rule out patients at high risk of mortality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
qSOFA评分对老年登革热患者死亡率的预测价值:一项回顾性病例对照研究
背景:老年患者的登革热(DF)与较高的死亡率相关,但最佳的死亡率预测方法尚不清楚。我们评估了快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)作为老年DF患者预测工具的效用。方法:我们回顾性纳入2015年9月1日至2015年12月31日期间在我们研究医院就诊的年龄≥65岁的DF患者。收集了人口统计学、生命体征、合并症、实验室数据和死亡率。评估qSOFA评分≥2分时预测30天死亡率的准确性。结果:招募了626例老年DF患者(平均年龄74.1岁,性别分布几乎相等)。qSOFA评分的平均±标准差在死亡组高于生存组(0.6±0.8比0.1±0,p)。结论:qSOFA评分≥2是预测老年DF患者30天死亡率的一种简单、特异的工具,具有较高的特异性和阴性预测值。它可以用来排除死亡率高的病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Association between time-domain heart rate variability, diastolic dysfunction and unplanned readmission to cardiovascular department in older type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Distinct mobility facets and their association with intrinsic capacity domains in (pre-)frail community-dwelling older adults: an application of the unified framework for measuring mobility. Meta-analysis of factors influencing depression in the elderly before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in 2023. PALLIHIP-study: Spinal Phenol IN Glycerol (SPING-block) in palliative, frail, older adults with a hip fracture: a study protocol. The impact of an intervention by a mobile geriatrics team including a pharmacist on potentially inappropriate drug prescription: results of the PharMoG study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1