Impact of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Epilepsy on Patterns of Use and Cost of Healthcare Services and Pharmacotherapy Among Medicare Enrollees: Findings From Analyses of Healthcare Claims From the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.01.015
Kathryn Evans, Qian Li, Yuliya Halchenko, Lu Zhang, Vanessa Danielson, Reginald Lassagne, Bronwyn Do Rego, Ariel Berger
{"title":"Impact of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Epilepsy on Patterns of Use and Cost of Healthcare Services and Pharmacotherapy Among Medicare Enrollees: Findings From Analyses of Healthcare Claims From the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services.","authors":"Kathryn Evans, Qian Li, Yuliya Halchenko, Lu Zhang, Vanessa Danielson, Reginald Lassagne, Bronwyn Do Rego, Ariel Berger","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the expected impact of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and prescription pharmacotherapies among Medicare enrollees with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) versus continued use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study that used healthcare claims data from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. All Medicare enrollees who underwent VNS implantation between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2020 were selected. Individuals without at least 24 months of continuous enrollment before implantation (index date) and at least 1 month of enrollment immediately thereafter were excluded. Patients without a diagnosis of epilepsy on the index date, and those without ASM claims during the 1-year period before that date, were also excluded. Observed patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and pharmacotherapies during the 2-year period prior to VNS were used to develop regression models to predict these outcomes during the 2-year period following the index date. Predicted monthly outcomes from these models during each month of the 24-month follow-up period were compared with corresponding outcomes observed in the database, with differences (observed minus expected) attributed to VNS implantation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 16,223 Medicare enrollees had a procedure code for VNS between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, of whom 19.4% (n = 3155) met all other selection criteria. Expected composite rates of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits were higher than observed for all-cause (38.95 events per 100 person-months [PMs] vs 23.15 per 100 PMs) and epilepsy-related (33.46 per 100 PMs vs 15.97 per 100 PMs) events (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Following the index month, mean monthly observed all-cause costs were $1286 lower than expected; epilepsy-related costs were $1351 lower. Differences between predicted and observed all-cause costs (including costs related to implantation) did not differ significantly by month 20, indicating an expectation that VNS \"breaks even\" within 2 years of implantation.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>VNS implantation was associated with 41% and 52% reductions in all-cause and epilepsy-related hospitalizations and ED visits, respectively (both vs expected), for Medicare patients with DRE, and its implantation may be cost-neutral within 2 years of the procedure. These results are similar in direction and magnitude to those observed in a previous study of commercially insured patients with DRE. Additional research is needed to better understand the impacts of neuromodulator implantation on other important outcomes, such as health-related quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.01.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the expected impact of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and prescription pharmacotherapies among Medicare enrollees with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) versus continued use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) alone.

Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study that used healthcare claims data from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. All Medicare enrollees who underwent VNS implantation between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2020 were selected. Individuals without at least 24 months of continuous enrollment before implantation (index date) and at least 1 month of enrollment immediately thereafter were excluded. Patients without a diagnosis of epilepsy on the index date, and those without ASM claims during the 1-year period before that date, were also excluded. Observed patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and pharmacotherapies during the 2-year period prior to VNS were used to develop regression models to predict these outcomes during the 2-year period following the index date. Predicted monthly outcomes from these models during each month of the 24-month follow-up period were compared with corresponding outcomes observed in the database, with differences (observed minus expected) attributed to VNS implantation.

Findings: A total of 16,223 Medicare enrollees had a procedure code for VNS between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, of whom 19.4% (n = 3155) met all other selection criteria. Expected composite rates of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits were higher than observed for all-cause (38.95 events per 100 person-months [PMs] vs 23.15 per 100 PMs) and epilepsy-related (33.46 per 100 PMs vs 15.97 per 100 PMs) events (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Following the index month, mean monthly observed all-cause costs were $1286 lower than expected; epilepsy-related costs were $1351 lower. Differences between predicted and observed all-cause costs (including costs related to implantation) did not differ significantly by month 20, indicating an expectation that VNS "breaks even" within 2 years of implantation.

Implications: VNS implantation was associated with 41% and 52% reductions in all-cause and epilepsy-related hospitalizations and ED visits, respectively (both vs expected), for Medicare patients with DRE, and its implantation may be cost-neutral within 2 years of the procedure. These results are similar in direction and magnitude to those observed in a previous study of commercially insured patients with DRE. Additional research is needed to better understand the impacts of neuromodulator implantation on other important outcomes, such as health-related quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
期刊最新文献
Economic Value of Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses for Cataract Surgery in Italy. Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of a Liposomal Carrier for Low-Dose Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (Clopidogrel and Aspirin) in Coronary Heart Disease Patients. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of SOX Plus Bevacizumab Versus SOX Plus Cetuximab for First-Line Treatment of KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan. Febuxostat, a Urate-Lowering Drug Bridging From Adults to Pediatrics; A Brief Report. Impact of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Epilepsy on Patterns of Use and Cost of Healthcare Services and Pharmacotherapy Among Medicare Enrollees: Findings From Analyses of Healthcare Claims From the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1