Exploring the causal association between circulating leukocyte count and IgA nephropathy based on two-sample Mendelian randomization: possible role of transitional B cells.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s10157-025-02646-3
Fang Fang, Hong Wang, Jun Luo, Fatong Hong
{"title":"Exploring the causal association between circulating leukocyte count and IgA nephropathy based on two-sample Mendelian randomization: possible role of transitional B cells.","authors":"Fang Fang, Hong Wang, Jun Luo, Fatong Hong","doi":"10.1007/s10157-025-02646-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To examine the causal association between genetically predicted circulating leukocyte counts and IgA nephropathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design was used. The exposures were the neutrophil, lymphocyte (with subsequent analyses for memory B-cell %lymphocyte, IgD<sup>-</sup> CD38<sup>br</sup> %lymphocyte, IgD<sup>+</sup> CD38<sup>br</sup> %lymphocyte, CD24<sup>+</sup> CD27<sup>+</sup> %lymphocyte, Sw mem %lymphocyte, transitional %lymphocyte, and naïve-mature B-cell %lymphocyte), monocyte, basophil, and eosinophil counts. The outcome was IgA nephropathy. Analysis was conducted using the inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode. The Cochran's Q-test and MR-Egger regression were used to assess heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy, respectively. The robustness of the results was tested using MR-PRESSO and leave-one-out analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The genetic prediction results showed causal associations between the neutrophil counts and IgA nephropathy (OR = 2.62, 95%CI 2.47-2.77, P < 0.001) and between the lymphocyte counts and IgA nephropathy (OR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.58-0.99, P = 0.04). Monocyte, basophil, and eosinophil counts showed no causal associations with IgA nephropathy. The supplementary genetic prediction analyses showed a causal association between transitional %lymphocytes and IgA nephropathy (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.39-0.87, P = 0.008). Cochran's Q test revealed heterogeneity for the neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, transitional %lymphocytes, and count analyses (all P < 0.05), but the MR-Egger test revealed no pleiotropy. After removing the outliers, the associations remained the same.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Causal associations were observed between neutrophil and lymphocyte counts as exposures and IgA nephropathy as outcome. Among lymphocytes, transitional B cells could be involved in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Attention should be paid to neutrophil and lymphocyte counts in future studies on IgA nephropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1032-1044"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-025-02646-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To examine the causal association between genetically predicted circulating leukocyte counts and IgA nephropathy.

Methods: A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design was used. The exposures were the neutrophil, lymphocyte (with subsequent analyses for memory B-cell %lymphocyte, IgD- CD38br %lymphocyte, IgD+ CD38br %lymphocyte, CD24+ CD27+ %lymphocyte, Sw mem %lymphocyte, transitional %lymphocyte, and naïve-mature B-cell %lymphocyte), monocyte, basophil, and eosinophil counts. The outcome was IgA nephropathy. Analysis was conducted using the inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode. The Cochran's Q-test and MR-Egger regression were used to assess heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy, respectively. The robustness of the results was tested using MR-PRESSO and leave-one-out analyses.

Results: The genetic prediction results showed causal associations between the neutrophil counts and IgA nephropathy (OR = 2.62, 95%CI 2.47-2.77, P < 0.001) and between the lymphocyte counts and IgA nephropathy (OR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.58-0.99, P = 0.04). Monocyte, basophil, and eosinophil counts showed no causal associations with IgA nephropathy. The supplementary genetic prediction analyses showed a causal association between transitional %lymphocytes and IgA nephropathy (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.39-0.87, P = 0.008). Cochran's Q test revealed heterogeneity for the neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, transitional %lymphocytes, and count analyses (all P < 0.05), but the MR-Egger test revealed no pleiotropy. After removing the outliers, the associations remained the same.

Conclusion: Causal associations were observed between neutrophil and lymphocyte counts as exposures and IgA nephropathy as outcome. Among lymphocytes, transitional B cells could be involved in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Attention should be paid to neutrophil and lymphocyte counts in future studies on IgA nephropathy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于两样本孟德尔随机化研究循环白细胞计数与IgA肾病之间的因果关系:过渡性B细胞的可能作用。
背景:研究遗传预测的循环白细胞计数与IgA肾病之间的因果关系。方法:采用双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)设计。暴露于中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞(随后分析记忆b细胞%淋巴细胞、IgD- CD38br %淋巴细胞、IgD+ CD38br %淋巴细胞、CD24+ CD27+ %淋巴细胞、Sw -m %淋巴细胞、移行性淋巴细胞和naïve-mature b细胞%淋巴细胞)、单核细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞计数。结果是IgA肾病。采用逆方差加权(IVW)、MR-Egger、加权中位数和加权模型进行分析。采用Cochran’s q检验和MR-Egger回归分别评估异质性和水平多效性。结果的稳健性测试使用MR-PRESSO和留一分析。结果:遗传预测结果显示中性粒细胞计数与IgA肾病之间存在因果关系(OR = 2.62, 95%CI 2.47 ~ 2.77, P)。结论:中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数作为暴露点与IgA肾病结局之间存在因果关系。在淋巴细胞中,移行性B细胞可能参与了IgA肾病的发病过程。今后对IgA肾病的研究应注意中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of renal outcomes between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Impact of leisure-time and daily life physical activity on chronic kidney disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: The Fukuoka Diabetes Registry. Effects of low-phosphate boiled-meat meal on CKD-MBD and inflammatory indicators in maintenance hemodialysis patients with controlled calcium carbonate dosing. cnm-positive Streptococcus mutans is associated with IgA nephropathy: a comparative study among kidney diseases. Facility-based educational systems and peritonitis incidence in peritoneal dialysis: findings from a nationwide survey in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1