Efficacy and tolerability of low versus standard daily doses of antiseizure medications in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial (STANDLOW).
Giorgia Giussani, Elisa Bianchi, Edoardo Carlando, Jacopo Cosimo DiFrancesco, Payam Tabaee Damavandi, Francesco Pasini, Giulia Pederzoli, Stefania Filipponi, Alessandra Gaiani, Luca Massacesi, Eleonora Rosati, Ginevra Giovannelli, Teresa Anna Cantisani, Michela Cecconi, Rossella Papetti, Monica Brioschi, Francesco Aruta, Elio Clemente Agostoni, Francesco Paladin, Filippo Dainese, Marco Longoni, Bartolini Yerma, Sara Gasparini, Umberto Aguglia, Edoardo Ferlazzo, Roberto Cantello, Gionata Strigaro, Marta Maschio, Dario Benincasa, Angela La Neve, Giovanni Falcicchio, Alfonso Giordano, Lara Buttarelli, Gabriele Enia, Maurizio Leone, Carlo Ferrarese, Ettore Beghi, Simone Beretta
{"title":"Efficacy and tolerability of low versus standard daily doses of antiseizure medications in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial (STANDLOW).","authors":"Giorgia Giussani, Elisa Bianchi, Edoardo Carlando, Jacopo Cosimo DiFrancesco, Payam Tabaee Damavandi, Francesco Pasini, Giulia Pederzoli, Stefania Filipponi, Alessandra Gaiani, Luca Massacesi, Eleonora Rosati, Ginevra Giovannelli, Teresa Anna Cantisani, Michela Cecconi, Rossella Papetti, Monica Brioschi, Francesco Aruta, Elio Clemente Agostoni, Francesco Paladin, Filippo Dainese, Marco Longoni, Bartolini Yerma, Sara Gasparini, Umberto Aguglia, Edoardo Ferlazzo, Roberto Cantello, Gionata Strigaro, Marta Maschio, Dario Benincasa, Angela La Neve, Giovanni Falcicchio, Alfonso Giordano, Lara Buttarelli, Gabriele Enia, Maurizio Leone, Carlo Ferrarese, Ettore Beghi, Simone Beretta","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The STANDLOW trial investigated whether first-line antiseizure monotherapy with low doses has a similar efficacy to standard doses, but with fewer adverse events, improved quality of life, and reduced costs for the National Health System.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, comparing low dose versus standard dose of antiseizure medications (carbamazepine, levetiracetam, valproate, zonisamide, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, lamotrigine, gabapentin, lacosamide) in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 58 randomized patients, 29 in the low dose arm and 29 in the standard dose arm, 27 (46.6%) females and 31 (53.4%) males, with an age between 18 and 87 years (median 54.9, IQR 32-71). The seizure type was focal impaired awareness seizures in 44 (75.9%) and focal aware seizures in 14 (24.1%). Etiology was unknown in 43 (74.1%) and structural in 15 (25.9%). At study entry, EEG was epileptiform in 28 (48.2%) and seizure frequency was low (≤2 seizures/month) in 41 (70.7%). The estimated relapse proportions at 12 months were 47% for the low dose and 48% for the standard dose, with a difference of 1% (95% CI: -30%; 27%). At the end of the study visit (12 months of follow-up, or immediately after seizure relapse or study withdrawal for other reasons, whichever came first), no differences in the number or severity of adverse events or quality of life measures were observed between the two treatment groups. The total drug-related costs over the entire study period were lower in the low dose arm (median per participant 253 € versus 475 € in the standard dose arm).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Although the efficacy of low doses versus standard doses appeared similar, non-inferiority could not be demonstrated due to slow recruitment and premature termination of the trial. Although statistically inconclusive, our findings suggest that a low dose of antiseizure medications may be considered as a first-line option in adult patients with a new diagnosis of focal epilepsy of unknown etiology and low seizure frequency.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study aimed to see if low doses of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) could be as effective as standard doses in treating adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Subjects were assigned to receive either a low or standard dose of ASMs. 58 adults participated. Both low and standard doses seemed to have a similar effect on controlling seizures. The study was stopped early due to slow enrollment, making it difficult to definitively prove that low doses were non-inferior to standard doses. Low doses of ASMs might be a reasonable option for adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy with no clear cause and few seizures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The STANDLOW trial investigated whether first-line antiseizure monotherapy with low doses has a similar efficacy to standard doses, but with fewer adverse events, improved quality of life, and reduced costs for the National Health System.
Methods: Multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, comparing low dose versus standard dose of antiseizure medications (carbamazepine, levetiracetam, valproate, zonisamide, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, lamotrigine, gabapentin, lacosamide) in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.
Results: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 58 randomized patients, 29 in the low dose arm and 29 in the standard dose arm, 27 (46.6%) females and 31 (53.4%) males, with an age between 18 and 87 years (median 54.9, IQR 32-71). The seizure type was focal impaired awareness seizures in 44 (75.9%) and focal aware seizures in 14 (24.1%). Etiology was unknown in 43 (74.1%) and structural in 15 (25.9%). At study entry, EEG was epileptiform in 28 (48.2%) and seizure frequency was low (≤2 seizures/month) in 41 (70.7%). The estimated relapse proportions at 12 months were 47% for the low dose and 48% for the standard dose, with a difference of 1% (95% CI: -30%; 27%). At the end of the study visit (12 months of follow-up, or immediately after seizure relapse or study withdrawal for other reasons, whichever came first), no differences in the number or severity of adverse events or quality of life measures were observed between the two treatment groups. The total drug-related costs over the entire study period were lower in the low dose arm (median per participant 253 € versus 475 € in the standard dose arm).
Significance: Although the efficacy of low doses versus standard doses appeared similar, non-inferiority could not be demonstrated due to slow recruitment and premature termination of the trial. Although statistically inconclusive, our findings suggest that a low dose of antiseizure medications may be considered as a first-line option in adult patients with a new diagnosis of focal epilepsy of unknown etiology and low seizure frequency.
Plain language summary: This study aimed to see if low doses of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) could be as effective as standard doses in treating adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Subjects were assigned to receive either a low or standard dose of ASMs. 58 adults participated. Both low and standard doses seemed to have a similar effect on controlling seizures. The study was stopped early due to slow enrollment, making it difficult to definitively prove that low doses were non-inferior to standard doses. Low doses of ASMs might be a reasonable option for adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy with no clear cause and few seizures.