Usefulness of a Digital Tool to Improve Methodology and Reporting of Breath Tests for Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000002163
Lisandro Pereyra, Leandro Steinberg, Sofia Navar, Juan P Stefanolo, Francisco Schlottmann
{"title":"Usefulness of a Digital Tool to Improve Methodology and Reporting of Breath Tests for Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.","authors":"Lisandro Pereyra, Leandro Steinberg, Sofia Navar, Juan P Stefanolo, Francisco Schlottmann","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>We aimed to determine if the use of a web-based digital tool could improve methodology and reporting of breath tests (BT).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Although BT represent a noninvasive and low-cost tool for the diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), lack of standardization and poor test performance have been described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of BT reports from 8 different gastroenterology units during the period April 2024 to July 2024. Data from the BT reports was extracted, masked, and uploaded in a digital tool that supports the entire breath test process and creates a report. Three experts in SIBO who were blinded for the test interpretation determined a diagnosis for each patient and delineated a total of 12 quality items that considered relevant to be included in a BT report. The main outcomes of the study were accuracy (ie, proportion of correct diagnoses) and quality of BT reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 BT were analyzed; the type of substrate was informed in 187 (89.0%) BT and lactulose was used in most of the studies (162/187, 86.6%). Most tests measured only hydrogen (89.5%) and 38 (18.1%) extended the BT for <90 minutes. SIBO was diagnosed in 92 (43.8%) and 79 (37.6%) patients in the original BT report and the digital tool report, respectively. As compared with the diagnosis by the expert gastroenterologists and current guidelines, the original report was accurate in 182 (86.6%) patients and the digital tool report in 210 (100%) patients (P<0.0001). Regarding quality of reporting, the original BT report had a median of 5 (3 to 8) items included and the digital tool report described a median of 9 (7 to 11) items (P<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breath tests methodology and interpretation for the diagnosis of SIBO are heterogenous and do not comply with current guidelines. The use of a web-based digital tool specifically developed to assist the entire BT process appears to improve accuracy and quality of reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goals: We aimed to determine if the use of a web-based digital tool could improve methodology and reporting of breath tests (BT).

Background: Although BT represent a noninvasive and low-cost tool for the diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), lack of standardization and poor test performance have been described.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of BT reports from 8 different gastroenterology units during the period April 2024 to July 2024. Data from the BT reports was extracted, masked, and uploaded in a digital tool that supports the entire breath test process and creates a report. Three experts in SIBO who were blinded for the test interpretation determined a diagnosis for each patient and delineated a total of 12 quality items that considered relevant to be included in a BT report. The main outcomes of the study were accuracy (ie, proportion of correct diagnoses) and quality of BT reports.

Results: A total of 210 BT were analyzed; the type of substrate was informed in 187 (89.0%) BT and lactulose was used in most of the studies (162/187, 86.6%). Most tests measured only hydrogen (89.5%) and 38 (18.1%) extended the BT for <90 minutes. SIBO was diagnosed in 92 (43.8%) and 79 (37.6%) patients in the original BT report and the digital tool report, respectively. As compared with the diagnosis by the expert gastroenterologists and current guidelines, the original report was accurate in 182 (86.6%) patients and the digital tool report in 210 (100%) patients (P<0.0001). Regarding quality of reporting, the original BT report had a median of 5 (3 to 8) items included and the digital tool report described a median of 9 (7 to 11) items (P<0.0001).

Conclusions: Breath tests methodology and interpretation for the diagnosis of SIBO are heterogenous and do not comply with current guidelines. The use of a web-based digital tool specifically developed to assist the entire BT process appears to improve accuracy and quality of reports.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进小肠细菌过度生长呼吸测试方法和报告的数字工具的有用性。
目的:我们旨在确定使用基于网络的数字工具是否可以改进呼吸测试(BT)的方法和报告。背景:虽然BT是一种诊断小肠细菌过度生长(SIBO)的无创和低成本工具,但缺乏标准化和较差的测试性能。方法:我们对2024年4月至2024年7月期间来自8个不同胃肠病学单位的连续一系列BT报告进行回顾性分析。BT报告中的数据被提取、屏蔽并上传到一个数字工具中,该工具支持整个呼吸测试过程并创建报告。SIBO的三名专家在盲法测试解释中确定了每个患者的诊断,并描述了被认为与BT报告相关的总共12个质量项目。研究的主要结果是准确性(即正确诊断的比例)和BT报告的质量。结果:共分析了210例BT;187 (89.0%) BT报告了底物类型,大多数研究使用乳果糖(162/187,86.6%)。大多数测试仅测量氢(89.5%)和38(18.1%)延长了BT。结论:用于SIBO诊断的呼吸测试方法和解释是不一致的,不符合现行指南。使用专门为协助整个BT过程而开发的基于网络的数字工具似乎可以提高报告的准确性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
A Population-Based Assessment of Physical Activity and Exercise in Persons With IBD. When Normal Imaging Says Enough: Rethinking the Role of Patency Capsule in Crohn's Disease. Impact of Primary Language on Early Repeat Screening Colonoscopy. Is Antibiotic Prophylaxis Warranted in All Patients With Biliary Obstruction Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Outcomes of HIV-positive Patients With Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the United States: An Analysis From the National Inpatient Sample.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1