Ge Qu, Amanda M Frantz, Cynthia S Garvan, Nikolaus Gravenstein, Joshua W Sappenfield
{"title":"Biplane Utilization Improves Accuracy for Peripheral IV Placement.","authors":"Ge Qu, Amanda M Frantz, Cynthia S Garvan, Nikolaus Gravenstein, Joshua W Sappenfield","doi":"10.1002/jcu.23943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound provides an advantage for obtaining vascular access in deep peripheral veins. Short-axis imaging gives the spatial relationship between the needle and the blood vessel, while long-axis allows for visualization of the whole length of the needle. Biplane imaging allows for simultaneous visualization of both views.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty participants were enrolled to assess whether biplane imaging provided an advantage for placing intravenous (IV) catheters in a commercially available phantom. Volunteers then performed 6 ultrasound guided attempts to place an IV, with the ultrasound view randomized between either biplane or single-plane imaging. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Spearman correlation analyses were used for data analysis by the study biostatistician using SAS software version 9.4 (Cary, NC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only one participant had prior experience with the biplane modality. Across both imaging modalities, prior experience and comfort with placing IVs with ultrasound were correlated with better performance. Biplane imaging had significantly fewer mean needle redirections, 1.5 versus 2.1 (p = 0.002), and fewer mean posterior vessel wall penetration complications, 0.1 versus 0.3 (p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in time to successful placement or the number of attempts between conditions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While there was no significant difference in time to IV placement, other outcomes were consistent with the study's hypothesis that biplane imaging would provide an advantage. Further studies are needed to evaluate if skills performed on phantoms are transferable to patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Ultrasound provides an advantage for obtaining vascular access in deep peripheral veins. Short-axis imaging gives the spatial relationship between the needle and the blood vessel, while long-axis allows for visualization of the whole length of the needle. Biplane imaging allows for simultaneous visualization of both views.
Methods: Thirty participants were enrolled to assess whether biplane imaging provided an advantage for placing intravenous (IV) catheters in a commercially available phantom. Volunteers then performed 6 ultrasound guided attempts to place an IV, with the ultrasound view randomized between either biplane or single-plane imaging. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Spearman correlation analyses were used for data analysis by the study biostatistician using SAS software version 9.4 (Cary, NC).
Results: Only one participant had prior experience with the biplane modality. Across both imaging modalities, prior experience and comfort with placing IVs with ultrasound were correlated with better performance. Biplane imaging had significantly fewer mean needle redirections, 1.5 versus 2.1 (p = 0.002), and fewer mean posterior vessel wall penetration complications, 0.1 versus 0.3 (p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in time to successful placement or the number of attempts between conditions.
Discussion: While there was no significant difference in time to IV placement, other outcomes were consistent with the study's hypothesis that biplane imaging would provide an advantage. Further studies are needed to evaluate if skills performed on phantoms are transferable to patient care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography.
The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents.
JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.