"Hospice was Created by the KKK"-Black Americans' Perspectives on Hospice Care.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1007/s40615-025-02340-w
Channing E Tate, Monica Perez-Jolles, Laura D Scherer, Tsion Shiferaw, Gwendolyn Mami, Daniel D Matlock, Amy G Huebschmann
{"title":"\"Hospice was Created by the KKK\"-Black Americans' Perspectives on Hospice Care.","authors":"Channing E Tate, Monica Perez-Jolles, Laura D Scherer, Tsion Shiferaw, Gwendolyn Mami, Daniel D Matlock, Amy G Huebschmann","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02340-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Misperceptions of hospice persist in communities of color. This study explored what Black Americans understand about and how they describe hospice care. The goal was to determine if older Black Americans can accurately describe hospice and to explore potential barriers and facilitators to hospice enrollment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A content analysis of qualitative data collected in a larger mixed-methods study. Participants responded to the written prompt, \"In your own words describe hospice care\" with no further instructions. Recruitment occurred from community settings between May 2019 to March 2020. We recruited 144 participants who were at least 65 years old and self-identified as Black or African American. The written narratives were analyzed to determine how accurately participants described: (1) hospice care and eligibility, (2) location of services, (3) services provided, and (4) goals of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participant ages ranged from 65 to 97 years (M = 74.62, SD = 6.94). Participants were predominately female (81%) and widowed (33%). Participants accurately described hospice care and eligibility (80%), goals of hospice (89%), and services hospice provides (83%). Only 39% of participants correctly identified locations of hospice services. Additionally, some participants (8%) reported certain myths and conspiracies pertaining to hospice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that older Black Americans accurately describe hospice care and eligibility, goals of care, and the services provided by hospice. However, most were unable to accurately describe the location of hospice services and a few reported myths and conspiracies. The study highlights areas to improve communication about hospice which may reduce some of the barriers to hospice enrollment in Black Americans.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04458090.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02340-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Misperceptions of hospice persist in communities of color. This study explored what Black Americans understand about and how they describe hospice care. The goal was to determine if older Black Americans can accurately describe hospice and to explore potential barriers and facilitators to hospice enrollment.

Methods: A content analysis of qualitative data collected in a larger mixed-methods study. Participants responded to the written prompt, "In your own words describe hospice care" with no further instructions. Recruitment occurred from community settings between May 2019 to March 2020. We recruited 144 participants who were at least 65 years old and self-identified as Black or African American. The written narratives were analyzed to determine how accurately participants described: (1) hospice care and eligibility, (2) location of services, (3) services provided, and (4) goals of care.

Results: Participant ages ranged from 65 to 97 years (M = 74.62, SD = 6.94). Participants were predominately female (81%) and widowed (33%). Participants accurately described hospice care and eligibility (80%), goals of hospice (89%), and services hospice provides (83%). Only 39% of participants correctly identified locations of hospice services. Additionally, some participants (8%) reported certain myths and conspiracies pertaining to hospice.

Conclusions: This study found that older Black Americans accurately describe hospice care and eligibility, goals of care, and the services provided by hospice. However, most were unable to accurately describe the location of hospice services and a few reported myths and conspiracies. The study highlights areas to improve communication about hospice which may reduce some of the barriers to hospice enrollment in Black Americans.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04458090.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“临终关怀是由三k党创造的”——美国黑人对临终关怀的看法。
背景:对安宁疗护的误解持续存在于有色人种社区。本研究探讨了美国黑人对临终关怀的理解以及他们如何描述临终关怀。目的是确定年长的美国黑人是否能准确地描述临终关怀,并探索临终关怀登记的潜在障碍和促进因素。方法:对大型混合方法研究中收集的定性数据进行内容分析。参与者回答书面提示,“用你自己的话描述临终关怀”,没有进一步的说明。招募发生在2019年5月至2020年3月期间的社区环境中。我们招募了144名参与者,他们至少65岁,自认为是黑人或非裔美国人。研究人员分析了参与者的书面叙述,以确定参与者描述的准确性:(1)临终关怀和资格,(2)服务地点,(3)提供的服务,以及(4)护理目标。结果:参与者年龄65 ~ 97岁(M = 74.62, SD = 6.94)。参与者主要是女性(81%)和丧偶(33%)。参与者准确地描述了安宁疗护和资格(80%)、安宁疗护的目标(89%)和安宁疗护提供的服务(83%)。只有39%的参与者正确地识别出临终关怀服务的位置。此外,一些参与者(8%)报告了与临终关怀有关的某些神话和阴谋。结论:本研究发现老年美国黑人准确地描述了安宁疗护、资格、疗护目标和安宁疗护所提供的服务。然而,大多数人无法准确描述临终关怀服务的位置,还有一些报道的神话和阴谋。该研究强调了改善临终关怀沟通的领域,这可能会减少美国黑人临终关怀登记的一些障碍。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04458090。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
Racial Disparities in Breastfeeding Behaviors and the Role of Prenatal Care Timing. Projected Cognitive and Brain Aging Benefits of Eliminating Cardiometabolic Risks in Non-Hispanic White and Black Males - HABS-HD. Dissociation between Perceived Discrimination and SDOH among Black and Hispanic Stroke Patients. The Relationship Between Dietary Behaviors and Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among West African Immigrants in Chicago,IL. Decomposing Black-White and Hispanic-White Disparities in Infant Prematurity by Maternal Age and Maternal Educational Attainment in the U.S., 2004-2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1