Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale.

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2025-02-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S508457
Xinlei Qu, Yu Luo, Yuanyi Liu, Xiangcai He, Yu Zhang
{"title":"Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale.","authors":"Xinlei Qu, Yu Luo, Yuanyi Liu, Xiangcai He, Yu Zhang","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S508457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale (PSRS) in the Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 3560 Chinese participants aged 18-60 years from various provinces and cities in mainland China were included. Sample 1 (n = 3316) was used for CFA, MI, internal consistency, convergent, criterion-related validity, and difference analysis. Sample 2 (n = 244) was employed to evaluate test-retest reliability over a four-week interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study validated a robust 23-item, five-factor structure for the Chinese PSRS, demonstrating strong reliability with a Cronbach's α of 0.90 and a test-retest reliability of 0.83. The PSRS and its subscales were significantly correlated with measures of depression, stress, anxiety, and self-efficacy. Strict invariance was observed across gender and age groups (18-40 and 41-60 years). Women and young adults scored higher on the overall scale and most subscales compared with their counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PSRS is a reliable instrument for assessing perceived stress reactivity within the Chinese population. By validating its cultural adaptation and psychometric properties, this study lays a foundation for its cross-cultural application. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of perceived stress reactivity differences across gender and age groups and provide practical insights for future interventions and stress management research in the Chinese population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"18 ","pages":"375-385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S508457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale (PSRS) in the Chinese population.

Methods: A total of 3560 Chinese participants aged 18-60 years from various provinces and cities in mainland China were included. Sample 1 (n = 3316) was used for CFA, MI, internal consistency, convergent, criterion-related validity, and difference analysis. Sample 2 (n = 244) was employed to evaluate test-retest reliability over a four-week interval.

Results: The study validated a robust 23-item, five-factor structure for the Chinese PSRS, demonstrating strong reliability with a Cronbach's α of 0.90 and a test-retest reliability of 0.83. The PSRS and its subscales were significantly correlated with measures of depression, stress, anxiety, and self-efficacy. Strict invariance was observed across gender and age groups (18-40 and 41-60 years). Women and young adults scored higher on the overall scale and most subscales compared with their counterparts.

Conclusion: The PSRS is a reliable instrument for assessing perceived stress reactivity within the Chinese population. By validating its cultural adaptation and psychometric properties, this study lays a foundation for its cross-cultural application. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of perceived stress reactivity differences across gender and age groups and provide practical insights for future interventions and stress management research in the Chinese population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
期刊最新文献
Indonesian Translation and Adaptation of Social Appearance Anxiety Scale (SAAS) for Early Adolescent Girls in Indonesia. Psychological Factors Influencing Appearance Anxiety Among Adolescents: A Systematic Literature Review. The Separation of Adult ADHD Inattention and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Symptoms and Their Association with Problematic Short-Video Use: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Interest-Curiosity, Depression, and Peer Relationships Among Chinese Adolescents: A Cross-Lagged, Semi-Longitudinal Study. Exploring the Relationship Between Aggressive Behavior, Family Parenting Styles, and Self-Esteem Among Only-Child College Students in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1