'See what you feel': The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL I-Perception Pub Date : 2025-02-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20416695251318591
Olga Daneyko, Francesca Frisco, Angelo Maravita, Daniele Zavagno
{"title":"'See what you feel': The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching.","authors":"Olga Daneyko, Francesca Frisco, Angelo Maravita, Daniele Zavagno","doi":"10.1177/20416695251318591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two experiments were conducted to explore the impact of the distance of a visual scale employed in the crossmodal matching method dubbed <i>See What You Feel</i> (SWYF) used to study the Uznadze haptic aftereffect. Previous studies reported that SWYF leads to a general underestimation of out-of-sight handheld spheres, which seems to increase with visual scale distance. Experiment 1 tested the effect of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching. A 19-step visual scale, made of actual 3D spheres (diameters ranging from 2.0 to 5.6 cm), was set at one of three possible distances (30, 160, 290 cm); participants' task was to find the matching visual spheres for four out-of-sight handheld test spheres (diameters 3.0, 3.8, 4.6, 5.0 cm). Results confirmed the underestimation effect and only partially confirmed the role of scale distance. Experiment 2 investigated the role of scale distance in a visual-to-visual matching task in which the same visual scale was employed, set at one of three distances (37, 160, 290 cm). Participants' task was to find a match for the same four test stimuli. Results showed no statistical difference between matched and actual sphere sizes with distance 37 cm; underestimations were observed with the far distances, thus reflecting overestimations of scale sphere sizes. Results from both experiments allow us to conclude that the underestimation effect observed with SWYF is a general feature of haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching, and that the SWYF method is a valuable tool for measuring haptic size perception with handheld stimuli when the visual scale is set at a visually comfortable peripersonal distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47194,"journal":{"name":"I-Perception","volume":"16 1","pages":"20416695251318591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I-Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251318591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to explore the impact of the distance of a visual scale employed in the crossmodal matching method dubbed See What You Feel (SWYF) used to study the Uznadze haptic aftereffect. Previous studies reported that SWYF leads to a general underestimation of out-of-sight handheld spheres, which seems to increase with visual scale distance. Experiment 1 tested the effect of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching. A 19-step visual scale, made of actual 3D spheres (diameters ranging from 2.0 to 5.6 cm), was set at one of three possible distances (30, 160, 290 cm); participants' task was to find the matching visual spheres for four out-of-sight handheld test spheres (diameters 3.0, 3.8, 4.6, 5.0 cm). Results confirmed the underestimation effect and only partially confirmed the role of scale distance. Experiment 2 investigated the role of scale distance in a visual-to-visual matching task in which the same visual scale was employed, set at one of three distances (37, 160, 290 cm). Participants' task was to find a match for the same four test stimuli. Results showed no statistical difference between matched and actual sphere sizes with distance 37 cm; underestimations were observed with the far distances, thus reflecting overestimations of scale sphere sizes. Results from both experiments allow us to conclude that the underestimation effect observed with SWYF is a general feature of haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching, and that the SWYF method is a valuable tool for measuring haptic size perception with handheld stimuli when the visual scale is set at a visually comfortable peripersonal distance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“看到你的感觉”:视觉尺度距离对触觉-视觉跨模匹配的影响。
为了研究乌兹纳泽触觉后效,我们进行了两个实验,以探索视觉尺度距离对跨模匹配方法(See What You Feel, SWYF)的影响。先前的研究报道SWYF导致了视线外手持球体的普遍低估,这似乎随着视觉尺度距离的增加而增加。实验1检验了视觉尺度距离对触觉-视觉跨模匹配的影响。由实际的3D球体(直径从2.0厘米到5.6厘米)组成的19步视觉尺度被设置在三种可能的距离(30、160、290厘米)之一;参与者的任务是为四个视线外的手持式测试球体(直径3.0,3.8,4.6,5.0 cm)找到匹配的视觉球体。结果证实了低估效应,仅部分证实了尺度距离的作用。实验2研究了尺度距离在视觉-视觉匹配任务中的作用,该任务采用相同的视觉尺度,设置为3种距离(37、160、290 cm)之一。参与者的任务是为同样的四个测试刺激找到一个匹配。结果显示,当球距为37 cm时,匹配球尺寸与实际球尺寸无统计学差异;在较远的距离上观测到低估,从而反映了尺度球体尺寸的高估。这两个实验的结果都表明,SWYF方法观察到的低估效应是触觉-视觉跨模态匹配的一个普遍特征,并且当视觉尺度设置在视觉舒适的近个人距离时,SWYF方法是测量手持刺激触觉尺寸感知的一个有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
I-Perception
I-Perception PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Rapid biasing effect of prior auditory contexts on bistable tritone perception". Context shapes evaluation of emotional valence, not emotional categorization: A fresh look at the Kuleshov effect. A quantitative measurement of dichoptic color difference thresholds related to binocular luster across various luminance. The bookend effect. Surreal amputations and the illusion of absence in the arts of magic and photography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1