Impact of Pulsatile Bidirectional Cavopulmonary Shunt on Pre-Fontan Hemodynamics in Single Ventricle Physiology: A Meta-Analysis Reveals Favorable Outcomes.

Ketut Putu Yasa, I Wayan Sudarma, I Komang Adhi Parama Harta, Putu Febry Krisna Pertiwi
{"title":"Impact of Pulsatile Bidirectional Cavopulmonary Shunt on Pre-Fontan Hemodynamics in Single Ventricle Physiology: A Meta-Analysis Reveals Favorable Outcomes.","authors":"Ketut Putu Yasa, I Wayan Sudarma, I Komang Adhi Parama Harta, Putu Febry Krisna Pertiwi","doi":"10.5761/atcs.ra.24-00170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to determine the outcomes of maintaining antegrade pulmonary blood flow (APBF) during the bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BCPS) procedure in patients with single ventricle physiology undergoing staged palliative surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted and focused on studies comparing pulsatile BCPS (with APBF) with non-pulsatile BCPS (without APBF). Outcomes were categorized into early (post-BCPS) and late (pre-Fontan). Data were analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel random effects model with odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42024586369).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies with 2504 patients were included. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (OR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.61-2.04, p = 0.73), but pulsatile BCPS led to a higher rate of prolonged chest drainage (OR 2.45, 95% CI: 1.43-4.20, p <0.001). Pulsatile BCPS resulted in significantly higher SaO<sub>2</sub> in both post-BCPS (MD 3.33%, 95% CI: 2.70-3.97, p <0.001) and pre-Fontan (MD 2.91%, 95% CI: 2.51-3.31, p <0.001). The Nakata index was also higher in the pulsatile group (MD 30.67, 95% CI: 16.68-44.65, p <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pulsatile BCPS can optimize pre-Fontan hemodynamics by improving oxygenation and pulmonary artery development. However, the increased risk of prolonged chest drainage requires careful patient selection and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.ra.24-00170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to determine the outcomes of maintaining antegrade pulmonary blood flow (APBF) during the bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BCPS) procedure in patients with single ventricle physiology undergoing staged palliative surgeries.

Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted and focused on studies comparing pulsatile BCPS (with APBF) with non-pulsatile BCPS (without APBF). Outcomes were categorized into early (post-BCPS) and late (pre-Fontan). Data were analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel random effects model with odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42024586369).

Results: A total of 17 studies with 2504 patients were included. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (OR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.61-2.04, p = 0.73), but pulsatile BCPS led to a higher rate of prolonged chest drainage (OR 2.45, 95% CI: 1.43-4.20, p <0.001). Pulsatile BCPS resulted in significantly higher SaO2 in both post-BCPS (MD 3.33%, 95% CI: 2.70-3.97, p <0.001) and pre-Fontan (MD 2.91%, 95% CI: 2.51-3.31, p <0.001). The Nakata index was also higher in the pulsatile group (MD 30.67, 95% CI: 16.68-44.65, p <0.001).

Conclusions: Pulsatile BCPS can optimize pre-Fontan hemodynamics by improving oxygenation and pulmonary artery development. However, the increased risk of prolonged chest drainage requires careful patient selection and monitoring.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脉动式双向腔室肺分流术对单心室前血流动力学的影响:一项荟萃分析显示了有利的结果。
目的:本研究旨在确定在进行分阶段姑息性手术的单心室生理障碍患者进行双向腔室肺分流术(BCPS)期间维持顺行肺血流量(APBF)的结果。方法:系统检索电子数据库,重点比较脉动性BCPS(带APBF)和非脉动性BCPS(不带APBF)的研究。结果分为早期(bcps后)和晚期(fontan前)。数据分析采用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型,采用优势比(ORs)和均值差异(MDs), 95%置信区间(ci)。研究方案已在PROSPERO中注册(CRD42024586369)。结果:共纳入17项研究,2504例患者。两组患者30天死亡率无显著差异(OR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.61-2.04, p = 0.73),但搏动性BCPS导致两组患者延长胸腔引流的发生率较高(OR 2.45, 95% CI: 1.43-4.20, p = 2) (MD 3.33%, 95% CI: 2.70-3.97, p)。结论:搏动性BCPS可以通过改善氧合和肺动脉发育来优化fontan前的血流动力学。然而,延长胸腔引流的风险增加,需要仔细选择和监测患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Left Atrial Hemodynamics on the Development of Pulmonary Vein Stump Thrombus: Results of Early and Late Postoperative Studies. Surgical Outcomes of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection in Jehovah's Witness Patients. Impact of Bilateral and Single Internal Thoracic Artery Bypass Grafting on Postoperative Reverse Remodeling in Patients with End-Stage Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence Patterns in Clinical Stage IA Lower-Lobe Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Toward an Optimal Surgical Strategy for Superior Segment (S6) Tumors. Mid-Term Functional Recovery after Surgical Correction of ALCAPA: A 16-Year Single-Center Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1