Disorganisation of inner retinal layers in diabetic macular oedema: is it time to standardise this OCT biomarker?

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1136/bjo-2024-326843
Luca Danieli, Giulia Midena, Luisa Frizziero, Edoardo Midena
{"title":"Disorganisation of inner retinal layers in diabetic macular oedema: is it time to standardise this OCT biomarker?","authors":"Luca Danieli, Giulia Midena, Luisa Frizziero, Edoardo Midena","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-326843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disorganisation of inner retinal layers (DRIL) is an optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarker in patients with diabetic macular oedema. Different ways of quantification of DRIL have been proposed, without final agreement. We found a significant difference in DRIL length if measured with different techniques. Our data highlight that DRIL needs to be measured in a standardised way to provide comparable clinical results. Whereas an international consensus is needed, DRIL measurement as mean of five central OCT scans spaced 120 µm seems better than a single scan and comparable to seven scans, which needs a longer assessment time.","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-326843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disorganisation of inner retinal layers (DRIL) is an optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarker in patients with diabetic macular oedema. Different ways of quantification of DRIL have been proposed, without final agreement. We found a significant difference in DRIL length if measured with different techniques. Our data highlight that DRIL needs to be measured in a standardised way to provide comparable clinical results. Whereas an international consensus is needed, DRIL measurement as mean of five central OCT scans spaced 120 µm seems better than a single scan and comparable to seven scans, which needs a longer assessment time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病黄斑水肿视网膜内层紊乱:是时候标准化这种OCT生物标志物了吗?
视网膜内层紊乱(DRIL)是糖尿病黄斑水肿患者的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)生物标志物。人们提出了不同的量化DRIL的方法,但没有最终的一致意见。我们发现,如果用不同的技术测量,DRIL长度有显著差异。我们的数据强调,DRIL需要以标准化的方式进行测量,以提供可比较的临床结果。尽管需要国际共识,但DRIL测量作为间隔120 μ m的5次中央OCT扫描的平均值似乎比单次扫描更好,可与7次扫描相媲美,这需要更长的评估时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
期刊最新文献
Histopathological characteristics of secondary enucleation after iodide-125 plaque radiotherapy in Chinese patients with uveal melanoma. Efficacy of lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy versus idebenone in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy due to the m.11778G>A MT-ND4 variant: two matching adjusted indirect comparisons. Epidemiological insights into epiretinal membranes using optical coherence tomography: the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study-2. Structural and vascular correlates of visual field defects in branch retinal vein occlusion: a multimodal imaging study. Epiretinal membranes: prevalence and associations in relationship to posterior vitreous detachment - the Beijing Eye Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1