Multi-faceted procurement with mixed integer linear programming for corporate 100 % renewable energy goal

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.135144
Hsin-Wei Hsu , Zhi-Wei Fan
{"title":"Multi-faceted procurement with mixed integer linear programming for corporate 100 % renewable energy goal","authors":"Hsin-Wei Hsu ,&nbsp;Zhi-Wei Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.135144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To achieve net-zero emissions, wind and solar power are projected to provide over half of global electricity by 2050. These sources, along with storage systems and Renewable Energy Certificates, are crucial for companies aiming for carbon neutrality. This study applies a mixed integer linear programming model to minimize procurement costs, considering regional cost differences and capacity factors. It focuses on the corporate sector, examining two cases based on different Renewable Energy 100 % Initiative accounting methods: the “Non-Circulation Case” and the “Circulation Case.” Each case includes “Aggressive” and “Normal” scenarios based on progress, outlining strategies, including capacity, electricity, storage, and cost. Key findings reveal that in the “Non-Circulation Case with Aggressive Scenario,” relying solely on a single energy source proves insufficient, necessitating investment in diverse sources such as secondary renewables (like wind), storage systems, and Renewable Energy Certificates. This strategy enhances system resilience but may pose financial challenges for smaller companies. In the “Non-Circulation Case with Normal Scenario,” companies can gradually invest in solar photovoltaics, supported by storage systems and Renewable Energy Certificates, to balance flexibility, efficiency, and affordability. The most significant contribution is demonstrated in the “Circulation Case with Aggressive Scenario,” where the model identifies a solar-dominated system emerges as the optimal strategy for achieving corporate 100 % renewable goals, driven by solar energy's superior cost-effectiveness and capacity factor in southern regions. In the “Circulation Case with Normal Scenario,” companies shift towards a solar-only energy system to leverage the high capacity factor in southern regions, ensuring a streamlined, scalable procurement strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 135144"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225007868","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To achieve net-zero emissions, wind and solar power are projected to provide over half of global electricity by 2050. These sources, along with storage systems and Renewable Energy Certificates, are crucial for companies aiming for carbon neutrality. This study applies a mixed integer linear programming model to minimize procurement costs, considering regional cost differences and capacity factors. It focuses on the corporate sector, examining two cases based on different Renewable Energy 100 % Initiative accounting methods: the “Non-Circulation Case” and the “Circulation Case.” Each case includes “Aggressive” and “Normal” scenarios based on progress, outlining strategies, including capacity, electricity, storage, and cost. Key findings reveal that in the “Non-Circulation Case with Aggressive Scenario,” relying solely on a single energy source proves insufficient, necessitating investment in diverse sources such as secondary renewables (like wind), storage systems, and Renewable Energy Certificates. This strategy enhances system resilience but may pose financial challenges for smaller companies. In the “Non-Circulation Case with Normal Scenario,” companies can gradually invest in solar photovoltaics, supported by storage systems and Renewable Energy Certificates, to balance flexibility, efficiency, and affordability. The most significant contribution is demonstrated in the “Circulation Case with Aggressive Scenario,” where the model identifies a solar-dominated system emerges as the optimal strategy for achieving corporate 100 % renewable goals, driven by solar energy's superior cost-effectiveness and capacity factor in southern regions. In the “Circulation Case with Normal Scenario,” companies shift towards a solar-only energy system to leverage the high capacity factor in southern regions, ensuring a streamlined, scalable procurement strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业100%可再生能源目标的多面采购混合整数线性规划
为了实现净零排放,预计到2050年,风能和太阳能将提供全球一半以上的电力。这些资源,以及存储系统和可再生能源证书,对于以碳中和为目标的公司至关重要。本研究采用混合整数线性规划模型,在考虑区域成本差异和产能因素的情况下,使采购成本最小化。它侧重于企业部门,研究了基于不同的可再生能源100%倡议会计方法的两个案例:“非流通案例”和“流通案例”。每种情况都包括基于进展的“积极”和“正常”情景,概述了包括容量、电力、存储和成本在内的策略。主要研究结果显示,在“积极方案的非循环案例”中,仅依靠单一能源被证明是不够的,需要对多种能源进行投资,如二次可再生能源(如风能)、存储系统和可再生能源证书。这种策略增强了系统的弹性,但可能会给较小的公司带来财务挑战。在“正常情况下的非循环情况”中,公司可以逐步投资太阳能光伏发电,由存储系统和可再生能源证书支持,以平衡灵活性、效率和可负担性。最重要的贡献体现在“积极方案的流通案例”中,该模型确定了太阳能主导的系统是实现企业100%可再生目标的最佳策略,这是由太阳能在南方地区优越的成本效益和容量因素驱动的。在“正常情况下的循环案例”中,公司转向仅太阳能能源系统,以利用南部地区的高容量因素,确保简化,可扩展的采购策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
期刊最新文献
A smart self-powered three-axis attitude sensor for aerial robot status awareness and collision warning Solar radiation capture and conversion characteristics of an optically truncated optimized compound parabolic concentrator with evacuated tube collector A modified actuator line model development for aerodynamic and wake analyses of a dual-rotor wind turbine under pitch motion Performance analysis and optimization strategy of multi-stage S-CO2 energy storage system based on graded compression heat recovery Unlocking ejector efficiency: A comprehensive review of intelligent optimization, advanced configurations, and future challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1