How effective are different protection strategies in promoting the plant diversity of temperate forests in national parks?

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122602
Zhengxue Zhu , Stefano Chelli , James L. Tsakalos , Alessandro Bricca , Roberto Canullo , Marco Cervellini , Riccardo Pennesi , Luciano L.M. De Benedictis , Vanessa Cesaroni , Alessandro Bottacci , Giandiego Campetella
{"title":"How effective are different protection strategies in promoting the plant diversity of temperate forests in national parks?","authors":"Zhengxue Zhu ,&nbsp;Stefano Chelli ,&nbsp;James L. Tsakalos ,&nbsp;Alessandro Bricca ,&nbsp;Roberto Canullo ,&nbsp;Marco Cervellini ,&nbsp;Riccardo Pennesi ,&nbsp;Luciano L.M. De Benedictis ,&nbsp;Vanessa Cesaroni ,&nbsp;Alessandro Bottacci ,&nbsp;Giandiego Campetella","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protected areas are supposed to mitigate the loss of diversity caused by human activities in forests. However, different management strategies applied across protected areas affect diversity in various ways. This study compares the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity, and the species composition of understory plants, between sustainably managed forests and strictly protected forests. From temperate beech (<em>Fagus sylvatica</em> L.) forests within the Foreste Casentinesi National Park (Northern Apennine, Italy), we selected 28 quadrats in strictly protected and managed zones. In each quadrat, we recorded the cover abundance of vascular plant species and measured two functional traits (specific leaf area and clonal lateral spread) on the most abundant understory species. We used generalized linear models to test for differences in taxonomic (species richness and the percentage of forest specialist species), functional (functional richness for single and multiple traits), and phylogenetic diversity (mean pairwise distance) between protection zones. Lastly, we evaluated differences in species composition between protection zones using non-metric multidimensional scaling, supported by PERMANOVA and indicator species analyses. Species richness and phylogenetic diversity did not differ between strictly protected and managed zones. Strictly protected forests had a significantly higher percentage of forest specialist species and functional richness of clonal lateral spread than forests allowing sustainable logging. Species composition was significantly different between strictly protected and managed forests; the most important indicator species detected within managed zones were <em>Sanicula europaea</em> and <em>Aremonia agrimonoides,</em> while <em>Veronica montana</em>, <em>Oxalis acetosella</em>, and <em>Salvia glutinosa</em> were indicator species within strictly protected forests. The difference between strictly protected forests and forests managed with sustainable logging is reflected in the proportion of forest specialist species and the diversity of belowground space occupation and resource acquisition strategies. Instead, species richness and phylogenetic diversity do not discriminate between the two protection zones. We suggest incorporating specialist species, functional and compositional diversity metrics into the evaluation framework to guide future conservation and management practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"584 ","pages":"Article 122602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725001100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protected areas are supposed to mitigate the loss of diversity caused by human activities in forests. However, different management strategies applied across protected areas affect diversity in various ways. This study compares the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity, and the species composition of understory plants, between sustainably managed forests and strictly protected forests. From temperate beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests within the Foreste Casentinesi National Park (Northern Apennine, Italy), we selected 28 quadrats in strictly protected and managed zones. In each quadrat, we recorded the cover abundance of vascular plant species and measured two functional traits (specific leaf area and clonal lateral spread) on the most abundant understory species. We used generalized linear models to test for differences in taxonomic (species richness and the percentage of forest specialist species), functional (functional richness for single and multiple traits), and phylogenetic diversity (mean pairwise distance) between protection zones. Lastly, we evaluated differences in species composition between protection zones using non-metric multidimensional scaling, supported by PERMANOVA and indicator species analyses. Species richness and phylogenetic diversity did not differ between strictly protected and managed zones. Strictly protected forests had a significantly higher percentage of forest specialist species and functional richness of clonal lateral spread than forests allowing sustainable logging. Species composition was significantly different between strictly protected and managed forests; the most important indicator species detected within managed zones were Sanicula europaea and Aremonia agrimonoides, while Veronica montana, Oxalis acetosella, and Salvia glutinosa were indicator species within strictly protected forests. The difference between strictly protected forests and forests managed with sustainable logging is reflected in the proportion of forest specialist species and the diversity of belowground space occupation and resource acquisition strategies. Instead, species richness and phylogenetic diversity do not discriminate between the two protection zones. We suggest incorporating specialist species, functional and compositional diversity metrics into the evaluation framework to guide future conservation and management practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同的保护策略在促进国家公园温带森林植物多样性方面效果如何?
保护区的目的是减轻森林中人类活动造成的多样性丧失。然而,不同的保护区管理策略以不同的方式影响多样性。本研究比较了可持续管理森林和严格保护森林的林下植物的分类、功能和系统发育多样性以及物种组成。在意大利北部亚平宁森林国家公园(forest ste Casentinesi)内的温带山毛榉(Fagus sylvatica L.)森林中,我们选择了严格保护和管理区内的28个样方。在每个样方中,我们记录了维管植物物种的覆盖丰度,并测量了最丰富的林下物种的两个功能性状(比叶面积和克隆侧展)。我们使用广义线性模型来检验保护区之间的分类差异(物种丰富度和森林专科物种百分比)、功能差异(单个和多个性状的功能丰富度)和系统发育多样性(平均两两距离)。最后,采用非度量的多维尺度,以PERMANOVA和指标物种分析为支撑,评估了保护区之间物种组成的差异。物种丰富度和系统发育多样性在严格保护区和管理区之间没有差异。严格保护的森林专科物种比例和无性系横向扩展的功能丰富度显著高于可持续采伐的森林。物种组成在严格保护和管理的森林之间存在显著差异;管理区内检测到的主要指示种为木樨草(Sanicula europaea)和农牧草(Aremonia agrimonoides),而严格保护区内检测到的指示种为维罗妮卡(Veronica montana)、牛蒡草(Oxalis acetosella)和鼠尾草(Salvia glutinosa)。严格保护的森林与可持续采伐管理的森林之间的差异反映在森林特有物种的比例以及地下空间占用和资源获取战略的多样性上。相反,物种丰富度和系统发育多样性在两个保护区之间没有区别。我们建议将特殊物种、功能和组成多样性指标纳入评估框架,以指导未来的保护和管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the necessity for an integrated management of the two-spotted oak borer, Agrilus biguttatus, and associated research priorities The phenology of European forests as seen by MODIS Leaf Area Index and GEDI Plant Area Index: Toward an integrated approach Facilitation of underplanted broadleaf trees by pine canopy under Mediterranean conditions depends on thinning intensity and type, not on species drought tolerance Stand density and structural complexity modulate the effects of restorative selective cutting on aboveground carbon stocks Deciphering carbon-water trade-offs between plantations and natural forests in tibet through an ecological spatial network perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1