Reciprocal regulation between rural settlement expansion and human-elephant conflict in China’s wild elephant range

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Geography and Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2024.08.014
Beibei Xu , Xin Zhang , Jiejing Zhang , Hui Fan
{"title":"Reciprocal regulation between rural settlement expansion and human-elephant conflict in China’s wild elephant range","authors":"Beibei Xu ,&nbsp;Xin Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiejing Zhang ,&nbsp;Hui Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2024.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) and its socioeconomic impacts are a pressing global issue. Accurately quantifying HWCs and their interaction with residential development is crucial for rural revitalization and biodiversity conservation efforts. This study investigates the interplay between rural residential expansion (RRE) with human-elephant conflict (HEC) in southern Yunnan Province using high-accuracy yearly land use/land cover data and Asian elephant accident data. A piecewise regression along with several metrics, including expansion intensity, rate of rural residential land, and residential density, were employed to analyze the spatial-temporal change characteristics of RRE. Then, a geographical detector and a bivariate spatial autocorrelation model were used to reveal the driving mechanisms of RRE, with particular emphasis on the spatial relations between RRE and HECs. The results indicate that HECs had a significant negative impact on RRE, exhibiting higher expansion intensity and rate of rural residential land in non-HEC areas than in HEC areas. High spatiotemporal consistency between accelerated RRE and intensified HECs occurred from 2010 onwards, which aligns with the year when the trend of settlement area expansion changed. RRE activities and ensuing land use conversions led to increased occurrences of HECs, which negatively affected the RRE. Compared to HECs, topography and locational factors exhibited a secondary effect on RRE activities. The findings underscore reciprocal feedback mechanisms between RRE and HECs and the elevated risk of adverse interactions between humans and elephants within the range of China’s wild elephants, providing theoretical support for coordinating conservation initiatives for Asian elephants with rural revitalization in the border areas of Southwest China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100238"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683924000919","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) and its socioeconomic impacts are a pressing global issue. Accurately quantifying HWCs and their interaction with residential development is crucial for rural revitalization and biodiversity conservation efforts. This study investigates the interplay between rural residential expansion (RRE) with human-elephant conflict (HEC) in southern Yunnan Province using high-accuracy yearly land use/land cover data and Asian elephant accident data. A piecewise regression along with several metrics, including expansion intensity, rate of rural residential land, and residential density, were employed to analyze the spatial-temporal change characteristics of RRE. Then, a geographical detector and a bivariate spatial autocorrelation model were used to reveal the driving mechanisms of RRE, with particular emphasis on the spatial relations between RRE and HECs. The results indicate that HECs had a significant negative impact on RRE, exhibiting higher expansion intensity and rate of rural residential land in non-HEC areas than in HEC areas. High spatiotemporal consistency between accelerated RRE and intensified HECs occurred from 2010 onwards, which aligns with the year when the trend of settlement area expansion changed. RRE activities and ensuing land use conversions led to increased occurrences of HECs, which negatively affected the RRE. Compared to HECs, topography and locational factors exhibited a secondary effect on RRE activities. The findings underscore reciprocal feedback mechanisms between RRE and HECs and the elevated risk of adverse interactions between humans and elephants within the range of China’s wild elephants, providing theoretical support for coordinating conservation initiatives for Asian elephants with rural revitalization in the border areas of Southwest China.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国野象区农村聚落扩张与人象冲突的相互调节
人类与野生动物冲突(HWC)及其社会经济影响是一个紧迫的全球性问题。准确量化人与野生动物冲突及其与住宅发展之间的相互作用对于乡村振兴和生物多样性保护工作至关重要。本研究利用高精度的年度土地利用/土地覆盖数据和亚洲象事故数据,调查了云南省南部农村住宅扩张(RRE)与人象冲突(HEC)之间的相互作用。研究采用片断回归方法,结合扩张强度、农村居民点用地率、居民点密度等指标,分析了农村居民点扩张的时空变化特征。然后,利用地理检测器和二元空间自相关模型揭示了RRE的驱动机制,特别是RRE与HEC之间的空间关系。结果表明,港珠澳大桥对 RRE 有显著的负面影响,非港珠澳大桥地区的农村居民点用地扩张强度和扩张速度均高于港珠澳大桥地区。从 2010 年开始,居民重新定居活动的加速与港珠澳大桥的强化在时空上高度一致,这与居民点扩张趋势的变化年份相吻合。RRE 活动和随之而来的土地用途转换导致了 HECs 的增加,从而对 RRE 产生了负面影响。相较于露天焚烧,地形和区位因素对 RRE 活动的影响次之。研究结果表明,在中国野生大象分布区内,RRE与HEC之间存在相互反馈机制,人象之间发生不利互动的风险升高,为协调亚洲象保护措施与中国西南边境地区乡村振兴提供了理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
期刊最新文献
The second phase of Global Dryland Ecosystem Program—Focusing on dryland social-ecological system and sustainability Integrating geography for sustainable development: Insights from the 2025 International Workshop on Geography and Sustainability Dryland Social-Ecological Systems in Changing Environments: By Bojie Fu and Mark Stafford Smith, 2024, Springer, Singapore. 424 pages, Open Access. ISBN 978-981-99-9374-1 Biophysical and socioeconomic drivers of livestock management in high-altitude Xizang, China Mapping geography’s engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals: Research foci, contributions, and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1