Addressing the advantages and limitations of using Aethalometer data to determine the optimal absorption Ångström exponents (AAEs) values for eBC source apportionment

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Atmospheric Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121121
Marjan Savadkoohi , Mohamed Gherras , Olivier Favez , Jean-Eudes Petit , Jordi Rovira , Gang I. Chen , Marta Via , Stephen Platt , Minna Aurela , Benjamin Chazeau , Joel F. de Brito , Véronique Riffault , Kostas Eleftheriadis , Harald Flentje , Martin Gysel-Beer , Christoph Hueglin , Martin Rigler , Asta Gregorič , Matic Ivančič , Hannes Keernik , Marco Pandolfi
{"title":"Addressing the advantages and limitations of using Aethalometer data to determine the optimal absorption Ångström exponents (AAEs) values for eBC source apportionment","authors":"Marjan Savadkoohi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Gherras ,&nbsp;Olivier Favez ,&nbsp;Jean-Eudes Petit ,&nbsp;Jordi Rovira ,&nbsp;Gang I. Chen ,&nbsp;Marta Via ,&nbsp;Stephen Platt ,&nbsp;Minna Aurela ,&nbsp;Benjamin Chazeau ,&nbsp;Joel F. de Brito ,&nbsp;Véronique Riffault ,&nbsp;Kostas Eleftheriadis ,&nbsp;Harald Flentje ,&nbsp;Martin Gysel-Beer ,&nbsp;Christoph Hueglin ,&nbsp;Martin Rigler ,&nbsp;Asta Gregorič ,&nbsp;Matic Ivančič ,&nbsp;Hannes Keernik ,&nbsp;Marco Pandolfi","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The apportionment of equivalent black carbon (eBC) to combustion sources from liquid fuels (mainly fossil; eBC<sub>LF</sub>) and solid fuels (mainly non-fossil; eBC<sub>SF</sub>) is commonly performed using data from Aethalometer instruments (AE approach). This study evaluates the feasibility of using AE data to determine the absorption Ångström exponents (AAEs) for liquid fuels (AAE<sub>LF</sub>) and solid fuels (AAE<sub>SF</sub>), which are fundamental parameters in the AE approach. AAEs were derived from Aethalometer data as the fit in a logarithmic space of the six absorption coefficients (470–950 nm) versus the corresponding wavelengths. The findings indicate that AAE<sub>LF</sub> can be robustly determined as the 1st percentile (PC1) of AAE values from fits with R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.99. This R<sup>2</sup>-filtering was necessary to remove extremely low and noisy-driven AAE values commonly observed under clean atmospheric conditions (i.e., low absorption coefficients). Conversely, AAE<sub>SF</sub> can be obtained from the 99th percentile (PC99) of unfiltered AAE values. To optimize the signal from solid fuel sources, winter data should be used to calculate PC99, whereas summer data should be employed for calculating PC1 to maximize the signal from liquid fuel sources. The derived PC1 (AAE<sub>LF</sub>) and PC99 (AAE<sub>SF</sub>) values ranged from 0.79 to 1.08, and 1.45 to 1.84, respectively. The AAE<sub>SF</sub> values were further compared with those constrained using the signal at mass-to-charge 60 (<em>m/z</em> 60), a tracer for fresh biomass combustion, measured using aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) and aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS) instruments deployed at 16 sites. Overall, the AAE<sub>SF</sub> values obtained from the two methods showed strong agreement, with a coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.78. However, uncertainties in both approaches may vary due to site-specific sources, and in certain environments, such as traffic-dominated sites, neither approach may be fully applicable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"349 ","pages":"Article 121121"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231025000962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The apportionment of equivalent black carbon (eBC) to combustion sources from liquid fuels (mainly fossil; eBCLF) and solid fuels (mainly non-fossil; eBCSF) is commonly performed using data from Aethalometer instruments (AE approach). This study evaluates the feasibility of using AE data to determine the absorption Ångström exponents (AAEs) for liquid fuels (AAELF) and solid fuels (AAESF), which are fundamental parameters in the AE approach. AAEs were derived from Aethalometer data as the fit in a logarithmic space of the six absorption coefficients (470–950 nm) versus the corresponding wavelengths. The findings indicate that AAELF can be robustly determined as the 1st percentile (PC1) of AAE values from fits with R2 > 0.99. This R2-filtering was necessary to remove extremely low and noisy-driven AAE values commonly observed under clean atmospheric conditions (i.e., low absorption coefficients). Conversely, AAESF can be obtained from the 99th percentile (PC99) of unfiltered AAE values. To optimize the signal from solid fuel sources, winter data should be used to calculate PC99, whereas summer data should be employed for calculating PC1 to maximize the signal from liquid fuel sources. The derived PC1 (AAELF) and PC99 (AAESF) values ranged from 0.79 to 1.08, and 1.45 to 1.84, respectively. The AAESF values were further compared with those constrained using the signal at mass-to-charge 60 (m/z 60), a tracer for fresh biomass combustion, measured using aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) and aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS) instruments deployed at 16 sites. Overall, the AAESF values obtained from the two methods showed strong agreement, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.78. However, uncertainties in both approaches may vary due to site-specific sources, and in certain environments, such as traffic-dominated sites, neither approach may be fully applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment
Atmospheric Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Spatial and seasonal variations and trends in carbon monoxide over China during 2013–2022 Method for planning subarea emission reduction strategies to improve ozone over a large area: A case of Taiwan An integrated drone-based platform with novel correction methods for accurate vertical profiling of black carbon Quantifying natural emissions and their impacts on air quality in a 2050s Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1